Control
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 123 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 63 | 73 | 82 | 115 |
| 1440p QHD | 94 | 108 | 121 | 171 |
| 1080p Full HD | 124 | 143 | 161 | 226 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
Control is a fast-paced action-adventure title that stresses both the CPU and GPU heavily, and the measured data for this AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combo shows a system that is capable of delivering high frame rates across all tested presets, though the optimal settings depend heavily on your target resolution. The benchmark results indicate that this pairing is well-balanced, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance complementing the GPU's substantial rasterization power, making it a versatile option for a game that rewards high and consistent frame rates.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows provide a clear picture of how this combo handles Control's four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the data shows that even the most demanding preset is easily handled. The Ultra preset averages 124 FPS, while the High preset pushes that to 143 FPS. However, the Low preset achieves an average of 226 FPS, and the Medium preset hits 161 FPS with a minimum of 136 FPS. For a 1080p display, the High preset is the sweet spot, as it offers a significant visual upgrade over Low while maintaining a 143 FPS average that is well above the refresh rate of most standard monitors. The Ultra preset's 124 FPS is still playable, but the 19 FPS gain from stepping down to High is a worthwhile trade for the marginal visual difference in most scenes.
Moving to 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The High preset averages 108 FPS, which is excellent for a high-refresh-rate 1440p monitor. The Medium preset drops to 121 FPS, but the low point is 103 FPS. The Ultra preset still manages a respectable 94 FPS average. The Low preset at 171 FPS is the outlier, but it sacrifices too much visual fidelity. For 1440p, the High preset is the clear recommendation. It provides a 14 FPS advantage over Ultra while maintaining a frame rate that is consistently above the 100 FPS mark, ensuring smooth gameplay without compromising the game's detailed environments and effects.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor. The Ultra preset averages 63 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a fast-paced game. The High preset improves this to 73 FPS, offering a more comfortable margin. The Medium preset yields 82 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS, which is a solid experience for 4K. The Low preset reaches 115 FPS, but the visual hit is substantial. Given the data, the High preset at 4K is the best balance, as it provides a 10 FPS improvement over Ultra while keeping the average well above the 60 FPS threshold. For players with a 4K 120Hz display, dropping to Medium might be necessary to fully utilize the refresh rate, but the 73 FPS from High is a strong baseline.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the driving force behind this combo's gaming performance, and its specifications in the FACT PACK explain the observed frame rates. The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. In Control, which features a dense, physics-heavy world, this memory capacity is sufficient for the High preset at all tested resolutions, as the data does not show any signs of texture thrashing or stuttering. The boost clock of 2610 MHz, with a base clock of 2310 MHz, allows the card to sustain high throughput, which is evident in the consistent FPS averages across the board.
The GPU's 7680 shading units and 80 ROPs are key to its rasterization performance. The measured results show a clear correlation between GPU load and the settings preset. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 63 suggests the GPU is fully utilized. The step from Ultra to High at 4K yields a 10 FPS jump, indicating that the GPU has headroom when the most demanding effects are reduced. The card's 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the theoretical peak, and the benchmark scores, such as the 31624 in Passmark G3D, place it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. This is a high-end part, and the data confirms it is well-suited for Control, providing strong performance even at 4K.
The RTX 4070 Ti also features 60 RT cores and 240 Tensor cores, which are relevant for Control's use of ray tracing and DLSS. While the measured FPS rows do not specify whether ray tracing is enabled, the card's architecture is capable of handling these features. The 12 GB VRAM is a notable consideration; at 4K Ultra, the game may approach the limit, but the measured data suggests it does not exceed it, as the minimum FPS at 4K Medium is 70, indicating no major memory-related hitches. The GPU's TDP of 285 W and the suggested 600 W PSU are practical details for builders, but the performance data is the primary indicator of its capability in this title.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals how the system's bottleneck shifts. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the FPS drops are moderate. For the High preset, the average goes from 143 FPS to 108 FPS, a 24.5% decrease. This is a typical scaling pattern, showing that the GPU is still the primary driver at 1440p, but the CPU's strong single-thread performance (with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz) is sufficient to keep frame times low. The Low preset shows a similar trend, dropping from 226 FPS to 171 FPS, a 24.3% decline.
The jump from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is where the scaling becomes more pronounced. For the High preset, the average FPS drops from 108 to 73, a 32.4% decrease. This larger drop indicates that the GPU is becoming increasingly saturated as pixel count rises. The RTX 4070 Ti's 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB memory are being pushed harder, and the data reflects this. At 4K, the CPU's role diminishes, and the GPU's raw fill rate (208.8 GPixel/s) and texture rate (626.4 GTexel/s) become the limiting factors. The Ultra preset at 4K (63 FPS) versus 1440p (94 FPS) shows a 33% drop, reinforcing that the GPU is the bottleneck at this resolution.
The data also shows that the scaling is not linear. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drop across all presets is around 24-25%. From 1440p to 4K, the drop is 32-33%. This non-linearity is typical of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 5 architecture, has enough headroom to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the GPU's performance ceiling is reached. For a player targeting 4K, the data suggests that the High preset is the ceiling for a smooth experience, while 1440p High is the sweet spot for high refresh rates.
FAQ
Q: What is the best preset for a 1440p monitor with a 144Hz refresh rate?
A: Based on the measured data, the High preset at 2560x1440 provides an average of 108 FPS, which is below 144 Hz but still smooth. For a more consistent experience near 144 Hz, the Medium preset averages 121 FPS with a minimum of 103 FPS, making it a viable choice if you prefer higher frame rates over visual fidelity. The Low preset at 171 FPS is the only one that fully saturates a 144Hz display, but it sacrifices significant visual quality.
Q: How much VRAM does this GPU have, and is it enough for Control at 4K?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160 with the Medium preset, the average FPS is 82 with a minimum of 70, indicating no major stuttering or memory-related performance drops. This suggests that 12 GB is sufficient for Control at 4K on the tested presets, though the Ultra preset's 63 FPS average implies the GPU is nearing its limit.
Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at 1080p?
A: The data shows that at 1920x1080 with the Low preset, the average FPS is 226. This high frame rate indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is not a bottleneck, as it can deliver frames far above what most displays can show. The CPU's boost clock of 5.60 GHz and 8 cores are more than adequate for Control's demands at this resolution.
Q: What is the FPS difference between the High and Ultra presets at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the High preset averages 73 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 63 FPS. This is a 10 FPS difference, or roughly a 15.9% improvement by stepping down from Ultra to High. Given that Ultra typically adds minor shadow and reflection effects, the High preset offers a better performance-to-visual trade-off for 4K gaming.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 339th out of 2888 tested combinations in Control, placing it in the top 12% of all tested systems. This is a strong result, reflecting the balance between the high-end CPU and GPU. The GPU's 84th percentile ranking and the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking contribute to this overall solid performance.
Q: Does the data include any minimum FPS values for all presets?
A: The FACT PACK includes minimum FPS values only for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 136 FPS; at 2560x1440, it is 103 FPS; and at 3840x2160, it is 70 FPS. For other presets, only average FPS is provided, so frame time consistency for those settings cannot be fully assessed from this data.
How This Combo Ranks
The comboRankInGame field places this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti at rank 339 out of 2888 tested combinations in Control. This puts the system in the top 11.7% of all tested configurations, which is a strong showing for a high-end but not flagship setup. The rank reflects the synergy between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU's 84th percentile ranking among all GPUs combine to produce a system that excels in this title.
The rank suggests that while there are many faster combinations, this setup is far above the median. The data indicates that the system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and comfortable 4K gaming. The 339th rank out of 2888 confirms the balance of the components; a less capable CPU or GPU would likely see the rank fall significantly. The fact that the CPU has a high single-thread score (2228 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU has strong rasterization performance (31624 in Passmark G3D) means that neither component is holding the other back in Control's mixed CPU/GPU workload. For a builder looking at this data, this rank provides confidence that the combo is a well-optimized pairing for this specific game.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D plays a crucial role in maintaining high frame rates, especially at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is more prominent. The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. This high boost clock is critical for Control, which often relies on a single main thread for game logic. The single-thread performance is evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2228, which is a strong result. The data shows that at 1080p with the Low preset, the system achieves 226 FPS, indicating that the CPU can handle the game's physics and AI without bottlenecking the GPU.
The CPU's 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a standout feature, likely derived from 3D V-Cache technology (though the FACT PACK does not explicitly list it as vCache3d). This large cache helps with data-heavy workloads, and in Control, which features destructible environments and many on-screen objects, it can reduce memory latency. The CPU's performance is further supported by its 4 nm process node, which contributes to its efficiency. The Passmark multithread score of 41318 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22807 show that it is also a capable multi-threaded processor, but in this game, the single-thread performance is more relevant.
At 4K resolution, the CPU's role diminishes, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The data shows that from 1440p to 4K, the FPS drops are substantial, which is a classic sign of GPU saturation. However, the CPU still needs to be fast enough to feed the GPU at 4K, and the 5.60 GHz boost clock ensures that frame times remain stable. The CPU's 16 threads are more than sufficient for Control's threading model, and the data shows no signs of CPU-related stutters at any resolution. For a builder, this CPU is a strong choice for a gaming rig, as it provides the headroom needed for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, while not being a hindrance at 4K.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 115.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 82.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 73.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 63.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 171.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 121.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 108.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 94.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 226.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 161.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 143.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 124.0 |
Control with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RTX 4070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + RTX 4070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.