Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 48 | 54 | 76 |
| 1440p QHD | 61 | 71 | 80 | 112 |
| 1080p Full HD | 81 | 93 | 105 | 148 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination delivers a mid-pack performance profile in Control, ranking 1294th out of 2888 tested combos. This places the pairing in the 55th percentile of all systems tested, indicating a balanced but not exceptional configuration for this title. The data shows a system capable of smooth 1080p and 1440p gameplay, with 4K remaining a challenge at higher settings.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X provides the computational foundation for this combo, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz offer substantial single-thread headroom, which is critical for Control's physics-heavy gameplay and real-time ray tracing calculations. The processor's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support rapid data movement, reducing potential bottlenecks when the GPU is processing complex visual effects.
Benchmark data shows the 9700X achieving a 3DMark 16-thread score of 9824 and a single-thread score of 1280, demonstrating strong multi-core scaling while maintaining excellent per-core performance. Cinebench R23 results reinforce this, with a multicore score of 20485 and singlecore score of 2211. The processor's 65W TDP suggests efficient power delivery, allowing sustained boost clocks during extended gaming sessions without thermal throttling.
In Control, the CPU's influence is most noticeable at lower resolutions and settings where frame rates exceed 100 FPS. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 148 FPS, indicating the 9700X can feed frames quickly enough to avoid limiting the GPU. However, the data suggests that at 4K Ultra (41 FPS), the CPU's role diminishes as the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The processor's 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs positions it well above average, yet its nearest rivals — including the Intel Core i9-14901E and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — match its average benchmark score within 0.1-0.4%, suggesting the 9700X offers no significant compute advantage over close competitors in synthetic tests.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is particularly relevant for Control, which uses high-resolution textures and effects that consume substantial VRAM. The GPU's 2459 MHz boost clock and 2041 MHz game clock provide solid rasterization throughput, backed by 2560 shading units and 96 ROPs. The 40 RT cores offer hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though Control's implementation can be demanding even on modern hardware.
The RX 7700's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 and PassMark G3D score of 20974 place it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show close competition: the Radeon R9 370X trails by 0.1%, while the RX 9060 leads by 1% and the RTX 3060 Ti leads by 1.7%. This clustering indicates the RX 7700 sits in a densely populated performance tier where small architectural differences determine positioning.
In Control, the GPU's role dominates at higher resolutions and settings. The transition from 1080p to 4K at High settings shows a 48% frame rate drop (93 to 48 FPS), while the same resolution change at Low settings drops from 148 to 76 FPS (49% decrease). These consistent ratios suggest the GPU is the limiting factor across most tested configurations, as CPU-bound scenarios would show less dramatic scaling with resolution changes.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
The combination ranks 1294th out of 2888 tested configurations, placing it in the middle of the distribution. This ranking reflects the pairing's balanced but unremarkable performance in Control specifically. The CPU's strong 86th percentile standing is offset by the GPU's more modest 58th percentile, creating a system that performs adequately but doesn't reach the upper echelons of the benchmark database.
The rank suggests that while the 9700X is a capable processor, it may be slightly overqualified for the RX 7700 in this title, or conversely, the GPU holds the combo back from achieving higher positions. The measured FPS data supports this interpretation: at 1440p Ultra (61 FPS), the system approaches playable thresholds, but at 4K Ultra (41 FPS), it falls short of smooth gameplay. The combo's percentile position roughly aligns with the GPU's individual percentile, indicating the graphics card is the primary determinant of overall ranking in this game.
Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing offers no standout characteristics. The 1080p Low result of 148 FPS is respectable for competitive play, but the 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS is below the 60 FPS target many players prefer. The data implies this system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K limited to lower settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
At 1080p, the combo delivers its strongest performance across all settings. Low settings produce 148 FPS average, Medium achieves 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 and maximum of 121, High reaches 93 FPS, and Ultra maintains 81 FPS. These results indicate the system can handle even the most demanding settings at 1080p with frame rates well above 60 FPS.
Moving to 1440p, performance remains solid but shows expected scaling. Low settings yield 112 FPS, Medium drops to 80 FPS (68 minimum, 92 maximum), High delivers 71 FPS, and Ultra falls to 61 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p results in an average reduction of approximately 24% across settings, with the largest drop at Low (148 to 112 FPS, 24% decrease) and the smallest at Ultra (81 to 61 FPS, 25% decrease).
At 4K, the system begins to struggle with higher settings. Low achieves 76 FPS, Medium manages 54 FPS (46 minimum, 62 maximum), High drops to 48 FPS, and Ultra falls to 41 FPS. The 4K Medium result shows the widest variation between minimum and maximum (46 to 62 FPS), suggesting inconsistent frame pacing during intense scenes. The 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?*
A: The data shows 1440p as the sweet spot. At High settings, the system achieves 71 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS target. The 1080p results are higher (93 FPS at High), but 1440p offers superior visual fidelity while maintaining playable frame rates.
*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Control?*
A: At 4K, only Low settings (76 FPS) and Medium settings (54 FPS) achieve acceptable performance. High (48 FPS) and Ultra (41 FPS) fall below 60 FPS, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay. Players wanting 4K should stick to Medium or Low settings.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 37943, which is within 0.4% of its closest competitors: the Intel Core i9-14901E (37911), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904), and Intel Core 5 211E (37829). This indicates nearly identical synthetic performance.
Q: What is the GPU's competitive position?
A: The RX 7700's average benchmark score of 15852 places it near several rivals: the Radeon R9 370X scores 15862 (0.1% higher), the RX 9060 scores 16014 (1% higher), and the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129 (1.7% higher). The Pro W5500 trails at 15679 (1.1% lower).
Q: Which settings provide the most consistent frame rates?
A: The 1080p Medium setting shows a minimum of 89 FPS and maximum of 121 FPS, a 32 FPS spread. The 1440p Medium setting shows a 24 FPS spread (68 to 92 FPS). The 4K Medium setting has the largest relative variation with a 16 FPS spread (46 to 62 FPS).
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to bottleneck in this game?
A: The resolution scaling data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck. From 1080p to 4K at High settings, performance drops 48% (93 to 48 FPS), while CPU-dependent tasks like Low settings show a similar 49% drop (148 to 76 FPS). If the CPU were limiting, the drop would be less pronounced at higher resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data points to 1440p High as the optimal configuration for balanced visual quality and performance. At 71 FPS average, this setting comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS target while providing the enhanced visual effects that Control's environments demand. The 1080p Ultra setting (81 FPS) offers higher frame rates but with diminishing visual returns at lower resolution.
For players prioritizing competitive smoothness, 1080p Low delivers 148 FPS, though this sacrifices the game's atmospheric lighting and particle effects. The 1080p Medium setting (105 FPS) provides a strong middle ground, retaining some visual quality while maintaining high frame rates. At 4K, Medium settings (54 FPS) are the highest playable option, though players should expect some frame rate dips to 46 FPS during demanding scenes.
The Ultra preset provides marginal benefits over High in most scenes, as evidenced by the relatively small FPS reduction (81 to 93 FPS at 1080p, 61 to 71 FPS at 1440p). This suggests Ultra is viable for players with 1080p displays, but the performance cost outweighs the visual gains at higher resolutions.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The frame rate scaling across resolutions reveals a consistent pattern: each step up in resolution reduces performance by roughly 24-25% per tier. From 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the drop is 22 FPS (93 to 71, 24% decrease). From 1440p to 4K at High, the drop is 23 FPS (71 to 48, 32% decrease). This accelerating decline at 4K indicates the GPU's memory bandwidth and fill rate are becoming saturated.
At Low settings, the scaling is more linear: 148 FPS at 1080p, 112 FPS at 1440p (24% drop), and 76 FPS at 4K (32% drop from 1440p). This pattern suggests that at lower settings, the CPU has more headroom, but the GPU still becomes the limiting factor at 4K. The RX 7700's 624.1 GB/s bandwidth appears sufficient for 1080p and 1440p workloads, but the higher pixel count at 4K strains the memory subsystem.
The data implies that the Ryzen 7 9700X's processing power is not the primary constraint in this game. The consistent resolution scaling, regardless of settings, points to the GPU as the limiting component. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1280) and high boost clock (5.50 GHz) ensure it can keep up with the RX 7700's output at most resolutions. However, the 41 FPS result at 4K Ultra shows where the GPU's capabilities end, making higher resolutions impractical for this combination.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
AMD Radeon RX 7700
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 76.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 48.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 41.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 112.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 80.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 71.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 61.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 148.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 105.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 93.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 81.0 |
Control with Ryzen 7 9700X + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RX 7700 + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700X + RX 7700
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.