Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
35
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 35 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 18 20 23 32
1440p QHD 26 30 34 48
1080p Full HD 35 40 45 63

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 32
3840x2160 Medium 23
3840x2160 High 20
3840x2160 Ultra 18
2560x1440 Low 48
2560x1440 Medium 34
2560x1440 High 30
2560x1440 Ultra 26
1920x1080 Low 63
1920x1080 Medium 45
1920x1080 High 40
1920x1080 Ultra 35

Control with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X + AMD Radeon RX 580, In-Depth Analysis

Control on the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and AMD Radeon RX 580 combination lands in the lower quartile of tested hardware pairings, with a combo rank of 3399 out of 3720 combos. This places the system at roughly the 91st percentile from the top, meaning it outperforms only about 9% of tested configurations. The ranking reflects a pairing where the GPU is the clear bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions and settings. While the CPU is a high-end part from the 5000 series, the graphics card is an older Polaris architecture product, and the measured frame rates confirm that the GPU's age limits the overall experience. The data shows a system that can handle 1080p gaming at reasonable settings but falls behind significantly when pushed toward 1440p or 4K.

The combo's position among 3720 tested configurations is a direct consequence of the hardware mismatch. The Ryzen 7 5800X is a modern Zen 3 part with strong multi-threaded capabilities, but it is paired with a Radeon RX 580 that was designed for a different era of gaming. Benchmark results indicate that this pairing delivers playable performance only at lower resolutions and lower quality presets. The following sections break down the specific contributions of each component and the measured FPS data to explain why this combo ranks where it does.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 3399 out of 3720 tested combinations places this system in the bottom 9% of all configurations. This is a low ranking, driven almost entirely by the graphics card's performance ceiling. The Ryzen 7 5800X is a capable processor, sitting in the 81st percentile against all CPUs, but the Radeon RX 580 only reaches the 53rd percentile against all GPUs. When combined, the weaker component dictates the overall gaming performance, and the ranking reflects that limitation.

Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing is outclassed by the majority of systems. The data suggests that most tested configurations achieve higher frame rates in Control, which is a demanding title. The RX 580's 8 GB of GDDR5 memory and 256-bit bus are adequate for 1080p, but the card's raw compute power — 6.175 TFLOPS FP32 — is insufficient for higher resolutions. The ranking would be significantly higher if the GPU were a more modern part, as the CPU has the headroom to support faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck.

The deltaPct values from the GPU's nearest rivals illustrate how close the RX 580 is to other mid-range parts. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER by 0.4% in average benchmark score, and it is nearly identical to the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile with a delta of -0.1%. This means the RX 580's performance is right in line with other mid-tier GPUs from its generation, but those parts also struggle with modern games at high settings. The combo's rank is therefore not an outlier but rather a typical result for a mid-range GPU paired with a high-end CPU.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 580 is the primary limiting factor in this combo. Its specifications — 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units — are modest by modern standards, and the card's 14 nm process node is two generations behind current GPUs. The GPU's base clock of 1257 MHz and boost clock of 1340 MHz are relatively low, and the memory runs at 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. These figures are adequate for 1080p gaming but quickly become insufficient at higher resolutions.

In Control, the GPU's role is critical because the game relies heavily on pixel throughput and texture fill rates. The RX 580's pixel rate of 42.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 193.0 GTexel/s are the key metrics that determine frame rates. At 1080p, the card can maintain playable frame rates, but at 1440p and 4K, the pixel count increases dramatically, and the RX 580 cannot keep up. The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern: at 1080p Low, the card delivers 63 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 18 FPS. This is a direct consequence of the GPU's limited fill rate and memory bandwidth.

The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for Control at all settings, as the game does not exceed this capacity at the measured resolutions. However, the GDDR5 memory type and 256 GB/s bandwidth are not fast enough to feed the GPU at higher resolutions, where the demand for texture data increases. The GPU's DirectX 12 support (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3 API compatibility are adequate for Control, but the card's GCN 4.0 architecture lacks modern features that could improve efficiency. Overall, the GPU's role is to provide baseline performance that is playable only at 1080p with lower settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?

A: Based on the measured FPS data, 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the system achieves consistently playable frame rates. At 1080p, even the Ultra preset averages 35 FPS, while Low averages 63 FPS. At 1440p and 4K, average frame rates fall below 48 FPS even on Low, making those resolutions less viable.

Q: How does the RX 580 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of performance?

A: The RX 580's average benchmark score is 12928, which places it 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (score 12986) and 0.1% behind the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile (score 12940). It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon 740M (score 12870). These deltas indicate that the RX 580 is competitive with other mid-range GPUs from its era, but none of these parts are high-end performers.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5800X the bottleneck in this system?

A: No, the data shows the opposite. The Ryzen 7 5800X is in the 81st percentile among all CPUs, and its benchmark scores — such as 15476 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2032 in Geekbench single-core — are strong. The GPU is the limiting factor, as evidenced by the FPS drops at higher resolutions that are characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios.

Q: What settings should I use for the best experience at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Medium preset delivers 45 FPS average with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 51 FPS, which is a good balance between visual quality and smoothness. The High preset drops to 40 FPS, and Ultra falls to 35 FPS, so Medium is the recommended choice for consistent performance.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Control?

A: No, 4K gaming is not viable with this hardware. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 32 on Low settings, and the Ultra preset averages only 18 FPS. These frame rates are below playable thresholds, and even the Medium preset at 4K averages 23 FPS with a minimum of 19 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance affect gaming?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X has excellent multi-threaded performance, with a Passmark multithread score of 27732 and a 3DMark max threads score of 7578. However, Control does not heavily utilize all 16 threads, so the CPU's advantage is mostly irrelevant in this game. The GPU's performance is the deciding factor for frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's performance across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system achieves its best results: Low averages 63 FPS, Medium averages 45 FPS (with a minimum of 38 and maximum of 51), High averages 40 FPS, and Ultra averages 35 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo, with playable frame rates even at the highest quality preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops significantly. Low averages 48 FPS, Medium averages 34 FPS (minimum 29, maximum 39), High averages 30 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. The 1440p resolution demands more from the GPU, and the RX 580 struggles to maintain smooth frame rates, especially at High and Ultra settings where averages fall below 30 FPS. This resolution is only viable at Low settings, and even then, the frame rate is borderline.

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly out of its depth. Low averages 32 FPS, Medium averages 23 FPS (minimum 19, maximum 26), High averages 20 FPS, and Ultra averages 18 FPS. None of these settings produce playable frame rates, and the system should not be used for 4K gaming in Control. The data shows a consistent pattern: as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and frame rates drop proportionally.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the GPU-bound nature of this system. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 63 FPS, but at 1440p Low, it drops to 48 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 32 FPS. This represents a 24% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 49% drop from 1080p to 4K. These drops are consistent with a GPU that is limited by its rendering capabilities rather than a CPU bottleneck.

The scaling is even more pronounced at higher settings. At Ultra, the system goes from 35 FPS at 1080p to 26 FPS at 1440p (a 26% drop) and then to 18 FPS at 4K (a 49% drop from 1080p). The consistent percentage drops across settings indicate that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors. The CPU's performance remains constant regardless of resolution, so the frame rate scaling is purely a function of the GPU's workload.

The data suggests that the RX 580 is roughly twice as fast at 1080p as it is at 4K, which is typical for a GPU with this level of compute power. The 6.175 TFLOPS FP32 performance is simply not enough to handle the 8.3 million pixels at 4K, whereas the 2.1 million pixels at 1080p are more manageable. The limiting component is clearly the GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to process the game's physics and AI without impacting frame rates.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X plays a supporting role in this combo, providing ample processing power that is not fully utilized by Control. The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Its Zen 3 architecture is efficient, and the 32 MB of L3 cache helps with game data access. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 15476 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1574.5 in single-core, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs.

However, in Control, the CPU is not the limiting factor. The game is primarily GPU-bound, as evidenced by the fact that frame rates drop significantly with resolution increases while the CPU's workload remains constant. The CPU's 16 threads are more than sufficient for Control, which typically uses fewer than 8 threads. The Passmark physics score of 1364 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7586 indicate that the CPU can handle complex game physics without issue.

The CPU's role is to ensure that the GPU is not starved of data, and in this regard, the 5800X performs admirably. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR4 support are adequate for feeding the GPU, and the PCIe Gen 4 interface (though the GPU uses PCIe 3.0) provides sufficient bandwidth. The data shows that upgrading the GPU would yield significant performance gains, while upgrading the CPU would have minimal impact on Control's frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the desired resolution and frame rate target. At 1080p, the Medium preset is the best choice, delivering 45 FPS average with a minimum of 38 FPS. This provides a smooth experience without sacrificing too much visual quality. The High preset at 40 FPS is also viable, but the Medium preset offers a better balance of performance and stability.

At 1440p, the Low preset is the only playable option, averaging 48 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 34 FPS, which may be acceptable for some users, but the minimum of 29 FPS indicates occasional stuttering. For a consistent experience at 1440p, Low settings are recommended, as they maintain frame rates above 45 FPS.

At 4K, no settings are recommended, as even the Low preset averages only 32 FPS, which is below the generally accepted threshold for smooth gameplay. Users with this combo should stick to 1080p or 1440p for the best experience. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution, as it provides marginal visual improvements over High while reducing frame rates by 10-15%. The data suggests that Medium settings at 1080p offer the best overall experience, balancing visual fidelity with frame rate stability.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 580

VRAM 8 GB GDDR5
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1340 MHz MHz
TDP 185 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800X + AMD Radeon RX 580 in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 32.0
3840x2160 Medium 23.0
3840x2160 High 20.0
3840x2160 Ultra 18.0
2560x1440 Low 48.0
2560x1440 Medium 34.0
2560x1440 High 30.0
2560x1440 Ultra 26.0
1920x1080 Low 63.0
1920x1080 Medium 45.0
1920x1080 High 40.0
1920x1080 Ultra 35.0

Control with Ryzen 7 5800X + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RX 580 + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800X + RX 580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.