Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 68 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 42 | 47 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 51 | 56 | 69 | 96 |
| 1080p Full HD | 69 | 79 | 88 | 124 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Control on the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT presents a classic study in resolution scaling, where the 16 GB RX 7600 XT moves from a dominant position at 1080p to a clearly limiting one at 4K. The measured data shows a steep and consistent drop in average frame rates as pixel count rises, with the gap between Low and Ultra settings widening dramatically at higher resolutions. This combination lands at rank 1027 out of 1636 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database, yet the actual gameplay experience varies wildly depending on your target resolution and quality expectations. The following analysis breaks down exactly what the numbers mean for each component, how they interact, and which settings deliver the best playable experience.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data tells a clear story about where the bottleneck lives. At 1920x1080, the system is capable of excellent performance, with Low settings hitting 123.6 FPS and even Ultra maintaining a solid 68.7 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop by roughly a quarter to a third: High goes from 78.6 to 56.4 FPS, Medium from 88.4 to 68.6 FPS, and Low from 123.6 to 95.6 FPS. This is a normal scaling pattern, but the drop from 1440p to 3840x2160 is far more punishing. At 4K, High settings fall to 42.2 FPS, Medium to 46.6 FPS, and Low to 60.5 FPS, while Ultra sinks to just 33.6 FPS.
The pattern indicates that the RX 7600 XT is the primary limiting factor at 4K. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 54.9 FPS (123.6 vs 68.7), but at 4K that gap shrinks to 26.9 FPS (60.5 vs 33.6). When the resolution increases, the GPU's shading units and memory bandwidth become saturated, so the difference between quality presets compresses because the card is already struggling to fill pixels. Interestingly, at 4K Low still manages 60.5 FPS, which is playable, but the step to Medium costs 13.9 FPS, and High costs another 4.4 FPS. This suggests that the 16 GB VRAM is not the issue at these settings; rather, the raw compute throughput of the Navi 33 chip is the wall. The CPU, by contrast, has ample headroom, as evidenced by the relatively small FPS penalty from 1080p to 1440p compared to the steep cliff from 1440p to 4K.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process. Its key specs include 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2755 MHz and a game clock of 2470 MHz. The memory subsystem is a 16 GB GDDR6 pool on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration gives it a passmark G3D score of 17132 and a percentile rank of 63 among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 20146 places it extremely close to the AMD Radeon RX 7600, which scores 20258 (a delta of -0.6%), and ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, which scores 19774 (a delta of 1.9%). It trails the RTX 3070 Mobile by 1.9%, which scores 20534.
In Control, the GPU's performance is the deciding factor at every resolution above 1080p. The 16 GB VRAM is a generous allocation for a card in this class, and it prevents any memory capacity-related stutters or texture pop-in at 4K Ultra, but the 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra (33.6 FPS) is below the playable threshold, confirming that the card's compute and bandwidth limits are hit before its VRAM capacity. The boost clock of 2755 MHz helps at lower resolutions, where the card can stretch its legs, but the data shows that the architecture's efficiency at higher pixel counts is the bottleneck. The passmark DirectX 12 score of 65 and DirectX 11 score of 167 are low relative to the G3D score, suggesting that the card's driver overhead or shader complexity handling is not ideal for Control's specific engine, but the numbers are what they are.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is a Zen 3 (Vermeer) part on the AMD Socket AM4 platform, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, and it packs a massive 96 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is the standout feature, and it shows in the CPU's benchmark results: a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22366 and a single-core score of 3157. The 3DMark scores are also strong, with 6755 for max threads and 804 for single thread. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24673, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-1360P (24627, deltaPct 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D (24605, deltaPct 0.3%), and the Intel Core i5-11600 (24559, deltaPct 0.5%). It also edges out the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, which scores 24811 (deltaPct -0.6%).
In the context of Control, the CPU is rarely the limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the system hits 123.6 FPS, which is a high frame rate that still does not stress the 5700X3D to its breaking point. The 8-core/16-thread configuration is more than sufficient for this Action Adventure title, and the large L3 cache likely helps with the game's asset streaming and physics calculations. The data shows that reducing resolution from 1080p to 4K at Low settings only drops the FPS from 123.6 to 60.5, which is a 51% reduction. If the CPU were the bottleneck, that drop would be much smaller, as the CPU workload would remain constant regardless of resolution. The fact that the FPS halves indicates the GPU is doing all the heavy lifting at 4K. The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3157, is adequate to keep the frame pacing smooth, but it is not the star of the show here. The combo rank of 1027 out of 1636 reflects that this CPU is overqualified for the GPU at high resolutions, but the pairing works well at 1080p and 1440p.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows provide a clear hierarchy for the best experience. At 1920x1080, the High preset at 78.6 FPS is the sweet spot, offering a smooth frame rate with only a 9.8 FPS penalty over Medium (88.4 FPS) and a 10.1 FPS gain over Ultra (68.7 FPS). The jump from Low (123.6 FPS) to Medium (88.4 FPS) is a 35.2 FPS loss, which is too steep for the visual gain, so High is the recommended starting point. For 2560x1440, High at 56.4 FPS is borderline, but Medium at 68.6 FPS is the better choice for a consistent 60+ FPS experience. The drop from Medium to High at 1440p is 12.2 FPS, which is noticeable, while the step from High to Ultra (50.5 FPS) is a further 5.9 FPS loss that pushes the game below 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, the situation is dire. Low at 60.5 FPS is the only preset that hits the 60 FPS mark, but Medium at 46.6 FPS is a more visually appealing compromise that still maintains playable frame rates. High at 42.2 FPS and Ultra at 33.6 FPS are not recommended for anything but screenshots.
The best overall experience per the data is 1440p Medium at 68.6 FPS, which balances visual fidelity with a comfortable frame rate. If you have a 1080p monitor, High at 78.6 FPS is the clear winner, as it sits well above the 60 FPS threshold and leaves headroom for demanding scenes. For 4K owners, the choice is between Low at 60.5 FPS and Medium at 46.6 FPS; the former is smoother but the latter is more visually rich. The data does not support chasing Ultra at any resolution above 1080p, as the GPU simply does not have the horsepower.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Control at 4K with playable frame rates?
A: Yes, but only on Low settings, which achieve 60.5 FPS. Medium drops to 46.6 FPS, while High and Ultra fall to 42.2 FPS and 33.6 FPS, respectively. For a consistent 60 FPS experience at 4K, you must use Low.
Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to its closest rivals in this game?
A: The card's average benchmark score of 20146 is 0.3% higher than the RX 460 (20088) and 1.9% higher than the RTX 2060 SUPER (19774). It is 0.6% slower than the RX 7600 (20258) and 1.9% slower than the RTX 3070 Mobile (20534). In Control, this translates to the RX 7600 XT being firmly mid-pack.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700X3D bottlenecking the RX 7600 XT in Control?
A: No. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24673, and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-1360P, is only 0.2% behind. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a clear GPU bottleneck, as the frame rate drops by over half when resolution increases, while the CPU workload remains static.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?
A: Medium at 68.6 FPS is the best choice. High at 56.4 FPS is below the 60 FPS mark, and Low at 95.6 FPS is unnecessarily fast for the visual quality loss. Medium offers a good balance between the two.
Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7600 XT have, and does it matter for Control?
A: The card has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The data does not show any VRAM-related performance cliffs in the measured presets, indicating that 16 GB is more than sufficient for this game at all tested settings.
Q: What is the combo's overall rank in the database?
A: This CPU and GPU combination ranks 1027 out of 1636 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion, which is consistent with the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking versus the CPU's 82nd percentile.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 123.6 on Low to 68.7 on Ultra. The specific numbers are: Low 123.6 FPS, Medium 88.4 FPS, High 78.6 FPS, and Ultra 68.7 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium is 35.2 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is only 9.9 FPS, showing diminishing returns at the top end.
At 2560x1440, the numbers compress slightly: Low is 95.6 FPS, Medium is 68.6 FPS, High is 56.4 FPS, and Ultra is 50.5 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 27.0 FPS, and the gap between High and Ultra is 5.9 FPS. This resolution is the practical ceiling for the GPU to maintain 60+ FPS on Medium settings.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates fall off a cliff: Low is 60.5 FPS, Medium is 46.6 FPS, High is 42.2 FPS, and Ultra is 33.6 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is a 13.9 FPS loss, and the step from High to Ultra is an 8.6 FPS loss. Only Low settings achieve a 60 FPS average at this resolution, and the Ultra preset is nearly half the frame rate of Low. The data across all resolutions shows a consistent pattern: the RX 7600 XT is a 1080p and 1440p card, and the 5700X3D provides ample headroom for the GPU to reach its limits without being held back.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 60.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 46.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 42.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 95.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 68.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 56.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 123.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 88.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 78.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 68.7 |
Control with Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X3D + RX 7600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.