Control

# Control with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a strong 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, with 4K performance requiring settings adjustments to maintain smooth play. This combination ranks 904th out of 3,720 tested combos in the game, placing it in the top quartile of all tested systems. The data shows a system capable of high refresh rates at mainstream resolutions, with the CPU providing ample headroom across all tested settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a Zen 3 architecture processor built on TSMC's 7 nm process, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The processor includes 32 MB of shared L3 cache, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 64 KB of L1 cache per core. Memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, delivering 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

In CPU benchmarks, the 5700X demonstrates balanced performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,184 points and single-core score of 1,499 points show strong multi-threaded capability alongside capable single-thread performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 10,779 and single-core score of 2,016 reinforce this profile. PassMark multithread score of 26,612 and single-thread score of 3,385 further characterize the processor's capabilities.

The CPU's percentile rank versus all CPUs is 79, indicating it outperforms approximately four-fifths of all processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 27,578 places it in a tight competitive cluster. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-12600K with an identical average score of 27,578 (0% delta). The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27,535 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27,636 (0.2% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 27,507 (0.3% higher). These near-identical scores indicate the 5700X sits in a highly competitive performance tier where no single processor holds a meaningful advantage.

For Control, an Action Adventure title, the CPU's 8-core/16-thread configuration provides substantial processing headroom. The measured FPS data at 1080p Low shows 193 FPS average, which is well beyond what the GPU alone could sustain at higher settings, indicating the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower graphical loads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,858 and max-thread score of 6,850 demonstrate the processor's ability to maintain consistent performance across varying thread utilization scenarios.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 utilizes the AD104 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock operates at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. The GPU's base clock is 1920 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz.

The RTX 4070 contains 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s. The GPU delivers 29.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio) computing. The TDP is 200 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W and a single 16-pin power connector.

In GPU benchmarks, the RTX 4070 shows strong synthetic performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,854 points. Geekbench OpenCL score reaches 154,858, while Vulkan score is 174,152. PassMark G3D score is 26,927, with a GPU compute score of 14,720. The GPU's percentile rank versus all GPUs is 81, meaning it outperforms roughly four-fifths of all graphics cards tracked.

The RTX 4070's average benchmark score of 37,648 places it among capable competitors. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at 37,628 (0.1% lower), followed by the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 37,507 (0.4% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile at 38,135 (1.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 at 37,157 (1.3% higher). These small deltas indicate the RTX 4070 is positioned in a dense performance band where generational and architectural differences produce minimal score separation.

For Control, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM capacity and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provide substantial memory resources for the game's texture-heavy environments. The 4K Ultra measured average of 54 FPS shows the GPU is the primary limiting factor at maximum settings, while the 1080p Low result of 193 FPS demonstrates the ceiling of the GPU's rendering capability when CPU overhead is minimal.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 ranks 904th out of 3,720 tested combos in Control, placing it in the top 24.3% of all tested systems. This composite ranking considers both the CPU and GPU contributions to overall game performance.

The CPU's percentile rank of 79 and GPU's percentile rank of 81 are closely aligned, suggesting a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. This balance is reflected in the measured FPS data, which shows the system maintaining playable frame rates across all tested settings and resolutions, with performance scaling predictably as graphical demands increase.

The rank of 904 out of 3,720 combos indicates that while this system is not at the absolute top of the performance pyramid, it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested configurations in Control. The data suggests this combo occupies a strong mid-to-upper tier position, suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with reasonable 4K capability when settings are adjusted appropriately.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080 resolution, the system delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 193 FPS, Medium settings yield 137 FPS with a minimum of 116 and maximum of 157, High settings achieve 122 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 106 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 87 FPS, showing a significant performance cost for maximum graphical quality.

Moving to 2560x1440 resolution, frame rates remain strong. Low settings average 146 FPS, Medium settings deliver 104 FPS with a minimum of 88 and maximum of 119, High settings achieve 92 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 80 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 66 FPS, narrower than at 1080p due to increased GPU workload.

At 3840x2160 resolution, the system shows its limits. Low settings average 98 FPS, Medium settings deliver 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 and maximum of 80, High settings achieve 62 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 54 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 44 FPS, indicating the GPU is becoming the dominant bottleneck as resolution increases.

The Medium settings rows are the only ones with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p Medium, the minimum of 116 and maximum of 157 show a 41 FPS range. At 1440p Medium, the range is 31 FPS (88 to 119). At 4K Medium, the range narrows to 21 FPS (59 to 80). This tightening of frame time variance at higher resolutions suggests the GPU workload becomes more consistent as pixel count increases, reducing CPU-induced frame pacing variations.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the system's bottleneck characteristics. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 193 at 1080p to 146 at 1440p (a 24.4% decrease), then to 98 at 4K (a 32.9% decrease from 1440p). This progressive decline indicates the GPU is increasingly stressed as pixel count grows.

At Medium settings, the progression is 137 FPS at 1080p, 104 FPS at 1440p (24.1% decrease), and 70 FPS at 4K (32.7% decrease from 1440p). High settings follow a similar pattern: 122 FPS at 1080p, 92 FPS at 1440p (24.6% decrease), and 62 FPS at 4K (32.6% decrease from 1440p). Ultra settings show 106 FPS at 1080p, 80 FPS at 1440p (24.5% decrease), and 54 FPS at 4K (32.5% decrease from 1440p).

The consistent percentage drops across all settings from 1440p to 4K (approximately 32-33%) suggest the GPU is the limiting component at these higher resolutions. The smaller percentage drops from 1080p to 1440p (approximately 24-25%) indicate that at 1080p, the CPU may still provide some headroom that gets consumed as resolution increases. The narrowing absolute FPS gaps between settings at higher resolutions (87 FPS difference at 1080p versus 44 FPS at 4K) further confirm that GPU throughput becomes the predominant constraint at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?

A: The data shows 1440p High delivers 92 FPS average, which balances visual quality with smoothness. At 1080p, Ultra achieves 106 FPS, while at 4K, High drops to 62 FPS. The 1440p High setting provides the best combination of resolution and frame rate for this system.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Control?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K Low, the system achieves 98 FPS average. At 4K Medium, it delivers 70 FPS with a minimum of 59. However, 4K Ultra drops to 54 FPS, which may approach the threshold where gameplay smoothness becomes compromised.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X has an average benchmark score of 27,578, identical to the Intel Core i5-12600K (27,578, 0% delta). The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27,535 (0.2% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27,636 (0.2% lower). These differences are negligible in practical terms.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37,648. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37,628 (0.1% lower), AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37,507 (0.4% lower), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135 (1.3% higher), and AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37,157 (1.3% lower). The RTX 4070 sits in the middle of this tight cluster.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 137 FPS with a minimum of 116 and maximum of 157. This represents a smooth experience with sufficient headroom for high refresh rate displays.

Q: Does the system maintain consistent frame times?

A: The only rows with minimum/maximum data are Medium settings. At 1080p, the range is 41 FPS (116-157). At 1440p, the range narrows to 31 FPS (88-119). At 4K, the range tightens further to 21 FPS (59-80). This suggests frame pacing becomes more consistent at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, Ultra settings at 106 FPS average provide the highest visual quality while maintaining frame rates above 100 FPS. This makes 1080p Ultra the recommended configuration for users prioritizing visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.

For 1440p, High settings at 92 FPS average offer an excellent balance. The step down to Medium saves only 12 FPS (104 versus 92), while the step up to Ultra costs 12 FPS (80 versus 92). High settings represent the sweet spot where visual quality improvements over Medium are noticeable, and the frame rate remains comfortably above 90 FPS.

For 4K gaming, Medium settings at 70 FPS average with a minimum of 59 FPS provide the most consistent experience. The jump from Medium to High costs 8 FPS (62 versus 70), which may be acceptable for users prioritizing visual quality. However, 4K Ultra at 54 FPS approaches the lower boundary of smooth gameplay, and the 4K Low setting at 98 FPS sacrifices too much visual quality for the frame rate gain.

The data indicates this system is best utilized at 1440p High for the ideal balance of resolution, visual quality, and frame rate. Users with 1080p displays can maximize settings without concern, while 4K users should stick to Medium or High settings depending on their tolerance for frame rate variations. The system's performance profile shows no configuration where it fails to deliver playable frame rates, making it a versatile option for Control across all tested resolutions.