Control
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 45 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 21 | 28 | 28 | 42 |
| 1440p QHD | 33 | 39 | 45 | 64 |
| 1080p Full HD | 47 | 55 | 57 | 83 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a lopsided combination for Control. The data shows a CPU that sits in the 83rd percentile among all processors, paired with a GPU that sits in the 50th percentile. This pairing results in a system that is heavily limited by the graphics card at every resolution, a fact that becomes immediately clear when examining the measured frame rates. The combination ranks 1493 out of 1636 tested combos in this game, putting it in the bottom tier of configurations.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate collapse from 1080p to 4K is stark, and it points directly at the GPU as the bottleneck. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 55.3 at 1920x1080 to 38.7 at 2560x1440, a loss of 16.6 frames per second. The drop from 1440p to 4K is equally severe, falling to 28.3 at 3840x2160. This is a classic signature of a graphics card that is running out of pixel throughput and memory bandwidth as the resolution increases.
The scaling pattern holds true across all settings. At Low, the system produces 83.3 FPS at 1080p, but this drops to 64.4 at 1440p and then plummets to 41.7 at 4K. The fact that even the lowest settings cannot maintain a 4K experience above 60 FPS confirms the RTX 3050 4 GB is the limiting component. The data suggests that the Ryzen 5 7600X is not the constraint; if it were, the FPS would remain more consistent across resolutions, as the CPU load is relatively resolution-independent.
The gap between 1080p and 4K at Medium settings is 29.5 FPS (57.4 down to 27.9). This near-linear degradation with pixel count is a strong indicator of a pure GPU limitation. The CPU is likely idle waiting for the GPU to finish each frame at higher resolutions. For a practical takeaway, this means that 1080p is the only viable resolution for smooth play, and 1440p is only feasible with significant settings compromises.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is the clear performance anchor in this pairing. Its specifications reveal why. The card features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. Control is a game that can be memory-hungry at higher settings and resolutions, and the limited capacity and bandwidth of this card will be strained.
The card’s clock speeds are listed as a base of 1545 MHz and a boost of 1740 MHz. The data shows that even with these clocks, the card cannot push high frame rates. At 4K Ultra, the system manages only 20.9 FPS, which is effectively unplayable. The pixel rate of 55.68 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s are simply not enough to fill 4K frames with the complex effects Control uses.
It is also worth noting the card’s memory type and speed. The 12 Gbps effective GDDR6 memory is standard, but the 4 GB capacity is the critical flaw. The benchmark results indicate that at Ultra settings, the performance drops sharply compared to High, suggesting that the card is likely spilling over its 4 GB VRAM buffer and incurring a heavy penalty. The difference between High and Ultra at 1080p is 8.6 FPS (55.3 vs 46.7), which is a significant hit for a settings increase that should be minor.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a powerful processor that is essentially wasted in this configuration for Control. With 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, it has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Its benchmark scores are strong; for instance, it scores 24128 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3406 in single-core. This places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.
However, the measured FPS data shows that this CPU power is not being fully utilized. The fact that the FPS drops so dramatically with resolution increases is proof that the CPU is not the bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the FPS would remain relatively flat regardless of resolution. Here, the 4K High score of 28.3 FPS is less than half of the 1080p High score of 55.3 FPS, which is a GPU-bound behavior.
The comparison to its nearest rivals underscores its capability. It scores within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, a chip with more cores, indicating that its high clock speeds are doing the heavy lifting. In this game, the CPU is likely waiting for the GPU to render frames, meaning the 7600X is providing more than enough headroom. The system is not CPU-limited, and the user would see no meaningful FPS gain from a stronger processor.
Settings Recommendations
Given the measured data, the optimal settings for this hardware are at 1920x1080 with the Medium preset. The data shows this combination yields 57.4 FPS, which is the closest to a smooth 60 FPS experience without dipping into Low settings. The High preset at 1080p provides 55.3 FPS, which is only 2.1 FPS lower, but the Medium preset offers a more comfortable buffer.
At 2560x1440, the situation is more challenging. The Low preset achieves 64.4 FPS, which is playable, but the visual quality would be significantly reduced. The Medium preset at 1440p drops to 45 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a fast-paced action game. The data suggests that 1440p is not a sweet spot for this GPU in Control.
The 4K resolution is not recommended for any preset. Even the Low preset only manages 41.7 FPS, and the High and Medium presets fall to 28.3 and 27.9 FPS respectively. The Ultra preset at 4K is the worst performer at 20.9 FPS. For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the 1080p Medium preset is the clear choice. Users who prioritize smoothness over visuals should consider the 1080p Low preset, which delivers 83.3 FPS.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Control?*
A: The data indicates 1920x1080 is the only resolution that provides a consistently playable experience. At High settings, it yields 55.3 FPS, and at Medium it achieves 57.4 FPS.
*Q: Can this system run Control at 4K?*
A: Technically yes, but not well. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 41.7 on Low settings. High, Medium, and Ultra presets fall to 28.3, 27.9, and 20.9 FPS respectively, which are not smooth gameplay experiences.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this pairing?
A: The data strongly suggests the GPU is the bottleneck. The frame rate drops significantly as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of a GPU-limited system. The Ryzen 5 7600X is a high-end processor that is not being fully utilized.
Q: What is the difference between the High and Medium presets at 1080p?
A: The difference is minimal. The High preset delivers 55.3 FPS, while the Medium preset delivers 57.4 FPS, a margin of just 2.1 FPS. This indicates that the Medium preset is more efficient.
Q: How does the GPU's memory size affect the results?
A: The 4 GB VRAM is likely a limiting factor. The significant performance drop from High to Ultra settings, such as from 55.3 to 46.7 FPS at 1080p, suggests the card may be exceeding its memory capacity at the higher preset.
Q: What is the worst-performing setting combination?
A: The 4K Ultra preset produces the lowest average FPS at 20.9. This is the most demanding configuration and the least playable.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for Control with this hardware is as follows, organized by resolution and settings.
At 1920x1080, the performance is the most variable. The Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 83.3. The Medium and High presets are close, with scores of 57.4 and 55.3 respectively. The Ultra preset is the lowest at 1080p, achieving 46.7 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates take a significant hit. The Low preset still manages a playable 64.4 FPS, but the Medium preset drops to 45. The High preset falls to 38.7 FPS, and the Ultra preset is the lowest at 32.9 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the performance is marginal at best. The Low preset is the only one that approaches playability, with 41.7 FPS. The High and Medium presets are nearly identical, with 28.3 and 27.9 FPS respectively. The Ultra preset is the lowest of all measured results, at 20.9 FPS.
The data shows a clear pattern: the GPU is unable to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions, making 1080p the only sensible choice for this configuration.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 41.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 28.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 27.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 20.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 64.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 45.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 38.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 32.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 83.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 57.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 55.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 46.7 |
Control with RTX 3050 4 GB + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RTX 3050 4 GB
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.