Control

# Control: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 delivers a mid-range 1080p experience in Control, with measured frame rates ranging from 35.5 FPS at 4K Ultra to 117.8 FPS at 1080p Low. This combination ranks 1136th out of 1636 tested combos for this title, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. The data indicates a system that can handle the game at 1080p with high settings comfortably, but struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K with elevated quality presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 1136 out of 1636 tested configurations places this pairing in the 31st percentile of all tested combos for Control. This rank reflects a system that is functional but not exceptional for this title. The CPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, sits in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 26617. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D with an average score of 26574 (a delta of 0.2 percent), the Intel Core i9-12900HK at 26672 (a negative delta of 0.2 percent), and the AMD EPYC 8024P at 26555 (0.2 percent delta). The Ryzen 5 7600 is effectively tied with these processors, showing that CPU-side performance is competitive with much more expensive options.

The GPU, AMD Radeon RX 7600, ranks in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20258. Its nearest rivals are notable: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 20146 (0.6 percent lower), the AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 20088 (0.8 percent lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (1.3 percent higher), and the Intel Arc B570 scores 20556 (1.5 percent higher). The RX 7600 is within 1.5 percent of all these rivals, indicating a tightly clustered performance tier. The low combo rank relative to the individual component percentiles suggests that the pairing itself may not be optimally balanced for Control, or that the game is particularly demanding on the GPU at higher resolutions.

The CPU's 3DMark scores reveal strong multi-threaded performance: 6499 in the 16-thread test and 6503 in the max-threads test, while single-thread performance reaches 999. Cinebench R23 scores of 22992 multi-core and 3246 single-core further confirm a capable processor. However, the overall combo rank indicates that in Control specifically, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, dragging the combined score down relative to what the CPU alone might suggest.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its clock speeds are specified as a base of 1720 MHz, a boost of 2655 MHz, and a game clock of 2250 MHz. The memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. These specifications are adequate for 1080p gaming, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity becomes a constraint at higher resolutions in Control.

The GPU's compute capabilities include 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 32 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. Floating point performance is rated at 21.75 TFLOPS for FP32 and 43.50 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The card is built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die.

In the context of Control's measured FPS, the GPU's role is decisive. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 117.8 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 35.5 FPS. This steep decline is consistent with the GPU being the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is likely a contributing factor at 4K, where texture data exceeds comfortable memory headroom. The GPU's benchmark scores show a mixed profile: a PassMark G3D score of 16634 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 90825, but a notably lower PassMark DirectX 12 score of 58, which may indicate driver-level variation in this title.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming with this combo?

A: At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 76.7 FPS average, while the Medium preset reaches 84.9 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 66.5 FPS, and Low achieves 117.8 FPS. For a balance of visual quality and smoothness, High or Medium are reasonable choices, as both exceed 60 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 1440p gaming in Control?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset produces 57.1 FPS, which is below 60 FPS but close. The Medium preset yields 61.6 FPS, just crossing the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings reach 88 FPS, while Ultra drops to 49.8 FPS. The system is borderline viable at 1440p with reduced settings.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves 63.1 FPS, which is playable. However, Medium drops to 41.1 FPS, High to 39 FPS, and Ultra to 35.5 FPS. 4K gaming is only feasible with the Low preset, and even then, the frame rate is modest.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26617, which is 0.2 percent higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (26574) and the AMD EPYC 8024P (26555), and 0.2 percent lower than the Intel Core i9-12900HK (26672). The differences are negligible, indicating performance parity across these processors.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7600's average benchmark score of 20258 is 0.6 percent higher than the RX 7600 XT (20146) and 0.8 percent higher than the RX 460 (20088). It is 1.3 percent lower than the RTX 3070 Mobile (20534) and 1.5 percent lower than the Intel Arc B570 (20556). These are tight margins, placing the card in a competitive mid-range tier.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings produce 117.8 FPS, while Ultra produces 66.5 FPS. This represents a 51.3 FPS difference, with Ultra being approximately 43.6 percent slower than Low, indicating a significant performance cost for the highest quality settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo covers three resolutions and four quality presets, providing a comprehensive view of performance scaling. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest average frame rate at 117.8 FPS. The Medium preset follows at 84.9 FPS, then High at 76.7 FPS, and Ultra at 66.5 FPS. All presets at 1080p exceed 60 FPS, making this resolution fully playable regardless of quality setting, though Ultra is closest to the threshold.

At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. The Low preset yields 88 FPS, which is still smooth. Medium reaches 61.6 FPS, marginally above 60 FPS. High falls to 57.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 49.8 FPS. This resolution is playable with Low or Medium settings, but High and Ultra require accepting frame rates below 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles. The Low preset produces 63.1 FPS, which is the only preset at 4K that exceeds 60 FPS. Medium drops to 41.1 FPS, High to 39 FPS, and Ultra to 35.5 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is substantial, at 22 FPS, suggesting that the Low preset avoids certain memory or compute bottlenecks. The data shows a clear pattern: as resolution increases, the GPU becomes increasingly saturated, and the 8 GB VRAM capacity likely contributes to the steep drop-off at 4K.

The frame rate differences between presets are consistent across resolutions. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 51.3 FPS. At 1440p, it is 38.2 FPS. At 4K, it is 27.6 FPS. This narrowing gap at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is the limiting component, as the absolute performance range shrinks when the GPU is more heavily loaded.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the GPU-bound nature of this configuration. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 76.7 at 1080p to 57.1 at 1440p, then to 39 at 4K. This represents a 25.5 percent reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a 49.2 percent reduction from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is not linear, with the 1440p to 4K transition being particularly steep.

At Low settings, the progression is from 117.8 FPS at 1080p to 88 FPS at 1440p to 63.1 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 25.3 percent and 46.4 percent respectively. Low settings show slightly better scaling characteristics, suggesting that reduced quality settings alleviate some of the GPU workload pressure.

The Medium preset shows 84.9 FPS at 1080p, 61.6 FPS at 1440p, and 41.1 FPS at 4K, with drops of 27.4 percent and 51.6 percent. The Ultra preset goes from 66.5 FPS at 1080p to 49.8 FPS at 1440p to 35.5 FPS at 4K, representing drops of 25.1 percent and 46.6 percent.

The data indicates that the CPU, with its high single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 999) and strong multi-thread scores, is not the bottleneck at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 117.8 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's practical frame delivery limit in this game. As resolution increases, the GPU workload grows, and the RX 7600's compute and memory bandwidth become the limiting factors. The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K, as evidenced by the 39 FPS average at High settings. The scaling pattern confirms that this combo is optimized for 1080p gaming, with acceptable performance at 1440p on lower presets, and only marginal capability at 4K with the Low preset.