Control

# Control — AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB combination delivers playable frame rates across all tested settings in Control, though the data reveals a system that becomes increasingly GPU-bound as resolution climbs. At 1080p, the pairing produces triple-digit averages on every preset, while 4K Ultra drops to 45 FPS — a 72% reduction from the 1080p Low result. This is a balanced mid-range pairing, ranking 1422nd out of 3720 tested combos in this game, placing it in the 38th percentile of all configurations.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of diminishing returns as pixel count increases. At 1080p Low, the system averages 162 FPS, which falls to 123 FPS at 1440p Low (−24%) and 83 FPS at 4K Low (−49% from 1080p). This scaling curve suggests the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB remains the primary limiter even at the lowest settings, since a purely CPU-bound scenario would show smaller drops from resolution increases.

Moving to High settings, the progression is 102 FPS at 1080p, 77 FPS at 1440p, and 52 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops between resolutions are consistent: −25% from 1080p to 1440p and −32% from 1440p to 4K. This steady degradation indicates the GPU's shading and memory bandwidth constraints dominate, with the Ryzen 5 7500F providing ample headroom throughout.

Ultra settings amplify the resolution sensitivity. The system produces 89 FPS at 1080p Ultra, 67 FPS at 1440p Ultra (−25%), and 45 FPS at 4K Ultra (−33% from 1440p). The 4K Ultra result falls below the 60 FPS threshold commonly considered smooth for action games, suggesting users targeting 4K should consider High or Medium presets instead.

The scaling from Low to Ultra at each resolution reveals the GPU's workload ceiling. At 1080p, the spread is 73 FPS (162 Low vs 89 Ultra); at 1440p it narrows to 56 FPS; at 4K the spread is 38 FPS. This compression at higher resolutions indicates the GPU becomes fully saturated, with settings changes having proportionally less impact on absolute frame rates.

GPU Role

The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB sits in the 19th percentile of all GPUs based on its average benchmark score of 2913 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with a score of 2907 (−0.2% delta) and the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2910 (+0.1% delta). This places the 8 GB model essentially tied with its 16 GB sibling in raw compute, suggesting the VRAM difference does not affect this particular benchmark.

The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory operates across a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The boost clock of 2535 MHz, combined with 4352 shading units, produces 22.06 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. These specifications explain the observed frame rates: Control's demanding visual effects at 4K Ultra require substantial memory throughput and shading capacity, both of which become limiting factors at that resolution.

The measured FPS data shows the GPU's capability ceiling clearly. At 1080p Medium, the system achieves 115 FPS with minimums of 98 FPS, indicating consistent frame delivery. The 4K Medium result of 59 FPS with a 50 FPS minimum shows the GPU struggling to maintain 60 FPS, with occasional dips that could be perceptible during intense combat sequences.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity does not appear to cause catastrophic stuttering in the measured data, as even the 4K Ultra run maintains a playable 45 FPS average without reported minimums below that figure. However, the gap between Low (83 FPS) and Medium (59 FPS) at 4K — a 24 FPS drop — suggests texture and shading quality settings heavily tax the memory subsystem.

FAQ

Q: Why does 4K Ultra produce only 45 FPS while 1080p Low reaches 162 FPS?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB's shading and memory bandwidth constraints become fully saturated at 4K, particularly with Ultra settings that maximize pixel shader workload. The 45 FPS result represents a 72% reduction from the 1080p Low figure, demonstrating the GPU's scaling limits.

Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Control at 4K?

A: The measured data shows playable averages at all 4K settings — 83 FPS Low, 59 FPS Medium, 52 FPS High, and 45 FPS Ultra — with no reported minimum frame rates below 50 FPS at Medium. This suggests the 8 GB capacity handles Control's requirements, though Ultra settings push the GPU to its limits.

Q: How does this GPU compare to the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the 8 GB model scores 2913 versus 2907 for the 16 GB version, a delta of +0.2%. The measured game performance is identical for this combo since only the 8 GB variant is used, but the benchmark data indicates no compute advantage from the larger memory pool.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average is 77 FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings. This represents a solid experience for action-adventure gameplay, sitting comfortably above 60 FPS while maintaining visual quality.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?

A: The resolution scaling data indicates the GPU is the limiting component. From 1080p to 4K at identical settings, frame rates drop by roughly 50%, which is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios. The Ryzen 5 7500F's performance appears sufficient to feed the GPU at all tested resolutions.

Q: Is 1080p Ultra a viable configuration?

A: Yes, the measured 89 FPS average at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings provides a smooth experience well above 60 FPS. This is the highest settings preset tested and remains fully playable at 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all tested CPU-GPU combinations in Control, this pairing ranks 1422nd out of 3720, placing it in the 38th percentile of configurations. This mid-pack ranking reflects the balanced nature of the components: the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is a capable mid-range GPU, while the Ryzen 5 7500F provides strong single-thread performance that complements it well.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 19th among all GPUs might suggest lower performance, but this reflects the entire GPU landscape including high-end models. The measured game FPS tells a more nuanced story: at 1080p, this combo outperforms many higher-ranked configurations in CPU-heavy games due to the Ryzen 5 7500F's strong multi-threaded capabilities.

The CPU ranks in the 77th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 24964. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, scores 24935 (+0.1% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005 (−0.2% delta). This places the 7500F in a tight cluster of competitive mid-range processors.

The combo ranking of 1422 out of 3720 indicates that roughly 38% of tested configurations deliver better Control performance, while 62% perform worse. For a mid-range pairing, this represents a reasonable position, with the GPU being the primary factor holding back higher placement.

Settings Recommendations

At 1080p, all four settings presets deliver playable frame rates. Ultra (89 FPS) and High (102 FPS) both provide smooth experiences, but Medium (115 FPS) offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance margin. Low settings (162 FPS) are unnecessary unless targeting very high refresh rates.

For 1440p, High settings at 77 FPS provide the optimal experience, staying above 60 FPS while maintaining substantial visual quality. Medium (87 FPS) offers more headroom for demanding scenes, while Ultra (67 FPS) remains playable but with less margin. Low (123 FPS) sacrifices too much visual quality for the performance gain.

At 4K, the data suggests Medium settings (59 FPS) as the recommended preset. It delivers near-60 FPS performance with a 50 FPS minimum, providing a stable experience. High (52 FPS) and Ultra (45 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold and may exhibit perceptible stutter during intense moments. Low (83 FPS) remains smooth but significantly reduces visual quality.

The measured minimum frame rates at Medium settings provide additional insight: 98 FPS at 1080p, 74 FPS at 1440p, and 50 FPS at 4K. These minimums indicate the system maintains consistent frame delivery without severe drops, supporting the recommendation of Medium for 4K and High for lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system produces its highest frame rates across all settings. Low averages 162 FPS, Medium averages 115 FPS with a range of 98–132 FPS, High averages 102 FPS, and Ultra averages 89 FPS. The 73 FPS spread between Low and Ultra demonstrates the GPU's scaling capability at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance decreases proportionally. Low averages 123 FPS, Medium averages 87 FPS with a range of 74–100 FPS, High averages 77 FPS, and Ultra averages 67 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 56 FPS, indicating the GPU begins to saturate.

At 3840x2160, the GPU reaches its limits. Low averages 83 FPS, Medium averages 59 FPS with a range of 50–68 FPS, High averages 52 FPS, and Ultra averages 45 FPS. The 38 FPS spread between Low and Ultra shows the GPU is heavily constrained at this resolution, with settings changes yielding diminishing returns.

The Medium preset is the only setting with complete min/max data across all resolutions. This reveals frame time consistency: at 1080p, the 98–132 FPS range shows a 34 FPS variance; at 1440p, the 74–100 FPS range shows a 26 FPS variance; at 4K, the 50–68 FPS range shows an 18 FPS variance. The narrowing variance at higher resolutions indicates the GPU maintains steadier frame delivery when fully saturated.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F provides 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process. It boosts up to 5.00 GHz from a 3.70 GHz base clock, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Its multi-threaded performance is strong: Cinebench R23 scores 22799 multicore and 3218 single-core, while Geekbench shows 12362 multicore and 2374 single-core.

The CPU's benchmark results place it in the 77th percentile of all processors. Its passmark multithread score of 26825 and single-thread score of 3841 demonstrate balanced performance. The 3DMark results show scaling from 974 single-thread to 6379 max-threads, indicating the 12 threads are effectively utilized.

In Control, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU. The resolution scaling data — where frame rates drop consistently as resolution increases — indicates the game is GPU-bound even at 1080p. The Ryzen 5 7500F's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3218) ensures it does not bottleneck the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13620H (+0.2% delta) and Intel Core 5 210H (+0.4% delta), all scoring within 0.4% of each other. This tight grouping suggests the 7500F performs competitively with modern mid-range mobile and desktop chips, providing sufficient compute for games like Control that rely more heavily on GPU throughput.

The 65 W TDP and 5 nm process make this an efficient processor, though the measured game data does not include power consumption figures. The DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provides ample memory throughput for the GPU, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface (24 lanes) ensures the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, using PCIe 4.0 x8, has sufficient bandwidth for data transfer.