Control

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER pairing delivers a robust Control experience, with the CPU providing a solid foundation and the GPU handling the visual load across resolutions. This analysis examines how the components contribute to the game's performance, contextualizes the results against rivals, and provides actionable settings guidance based on the measured data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, which is not unlocked for overclocking. A key feature is its substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is likely a significant factor in its gaming performance, as it allows for more data to be stored on-die for quick access. The CPU has a 105W TDP and uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, supporting DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

In the context of Control, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is more than sufficient to feed the GPU, as the game's engine typically scales well with a handful of threads. The high L3 cache size is particularly beneficial for the game's physics and AI computations, which can often cause stuttering if the CPU has to fetch data from system memory. The data shows the CPU's passmark single-thread score is 2941, and its multithread score is 20363. These scores place it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a capable gaming processor.

Benchmark results show the 5500X3D is a close competitor to several other processors. Its average benchmark score of 37018 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, which scores 36945, a delta of only 0.2%. It also performs within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, with deltas of 0.2% and -0.2% respectively. The only notable comparison is with the Intel Core i9-12900T, which scores 37112, putting the 5500X3D just 0.3% behind. In practical terms for Control, this means the CPU is not a bottleneck; it provides a stable platform that allows the GPU to be the primary determinant of frame rates.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the driving force in this configuration. Built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip, it features 8448 shading units and 66 RT cores. Its memory subsystem is a highlight, with 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. This is ample VRAM for Control at any settings, ensuring that texture streaming and high-resolution assets do not cause performance dips. The GPU has a base clock of 2340 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, with memory running at an effective 21 Gbps.

The GPU's performance is substantial. Its passmark G3D score is 31811, and it achieves a FP32 compute throughput of 44.10 TFLOPS. This places it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's performance is comparable to several other high-end cards, though the data from nearestRivals shows it is slightly below them in average benchmark score. For instance, the NVIDIA TITAN RTX scores 31676, which is 1.9% higher, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 31532, which is 1.4% higher. The Quadro M5000 and GRID M60-1Q also score slightly higher, by 0.4% each.

This raw power translates directly to frame rates in Control. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU is capable of handling even 4K resolution, which demonstrates its strength. With 16 GB of VRAM, there is no concern about running out of memory at Ultra settings, which is a crucial advantage for maintaining consistent performance in a game like Control, known for its detailed environments and particle effects. The GPU's performance is the primary driver of the FPS numbers detailed in the measured FPS breakdown, with the CPU providing the necessary support to avoid bottlenecks.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5500X3D compare to its closest rival, the Ryzen 5 5600F?

A: The data shows they are nearly identical in performance. The Ryzen 5 5500X3D has an average benchmark score of 37018, while the Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36945. This is a negligible difference of 0.2%, meaning in most scenarios, including Control, you would experience essentially the same CPU performance.

Q: Is the 16 GB of VRAM on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sufficient for Control at 4K?

A: Yes, the data indicates it is more than sufficient. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 on High settings is 73 FPS, and even on Ultra it maintains 64 FPS. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory ensures that the game's textures and assets are fully loaded without causing memory-related stutters or frame drops.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and what does it signify?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500X3D is in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. This means it performs better than 85% of all processors in the benchmark database. For a gaming-focused CPU, this is a strong result, indicating it is well above average for handling game logic and physics.

Q: What is the expected frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: There is a significant performance gap. At 2560x1440, Low settings yield an average of 172 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to an average of 94 FPS. This shows a substantial 78 FPS difference, highlighting the heavy demand that Ultra settings place on the GPU.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER significantly outperform the TITAN RTX?

A: No, the benchmark data shows the opposite. The TITAN RTX has a higher average benchmark score of 31676, compared to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31087. This makes the TITAN RTX 1.9% faster in synthetic tests, although the 4070 Ti SUPER offers newer features and more VRAM.

Q: How does the combo rank in this game relative to other tested combinations?

A: The combination of the Ryzen 5 5500X3D and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ranks 401st out of 2888 tested combos in Control. This places it in the top 14% of all configurations, indicating it is a very high-performing setup for this game.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Control, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER achieves a rank of 401 out of 2888 total combos. This positions the setup in the top 14% of all tested configurations, which is a strong indicator of its capability to deliver a high-quality gaming experience.

This ranking is a result of the synergy between the two components. The CPU, with its high L3 cache and strong single-thread performance, ensures that the game's logic is processed efficiently, preventing CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU, with its substantial 16 GB VRAM and high compute throughput, can then push high frame rates even at demanding resolutions. The fact that it outperforms 86% of other tested combos suggests that this is a well-balanced pairing for Control, where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher settings, and the CPU is more than capable of keeping up. The rank reflects that this is not just a high-end setup, but one that is particularly well-suited for the demands of this specific title.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the resolution and the user's target frame rate. The data shows a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and performance.

For 1920x1080, the High preset provides the best balance. It achieves a high average of 144 FPS, which is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors. While Low and Medium push higher (196 and 162 FPS respectively), the jump to Ultra yields 125 FPS, which is still very playable. However, High offers the sweet spot, delivering a buttery-smooth experience without sacrificing the game's impressive visual effects.

At 2560x1440, the High preset remains the recommended choice. It delivers an average of 109 FPS, which is ideal for a smooth, responsive experience. The Medium settings produce 122 FPS, but the visual improvement from Medium to High is often substantial. Ultra settings drop to 94 FPS, which is still playable but begins to introduce a noticeable reduction in smoothness for fast-paced action. The High preset at this resolution offers the best combination of frame rate and visual quality.

For 3840x2160, the High preset is also the recommended starting point. It yields an average of 73 FPS, which is playable on a 60Hz display. Medium settings provide a slight boost to 83 FPS, but the visual uplift of High is generally worth the 10 FPS cost. Ultra settings are the most demanding, producing 64 FPS, which is borderline for a smooth experience. Low settings at 4K achieve 116 FPS, but the visual downgrade is severe. For a 4K experience, High is the recommended preset to maintain a good balance of quality and performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Control with this hardware combination provides a clear picture of its scaling across resolutions and settings. The data is segmented by resolution and preset.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Ultra: Average 64 FPS.
• High: Average 73 FPS.
• Medium: Average 83 FPS, with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS.
• Low: Average 116 FPS.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Ultra: Average 94 FPS.
• High: Average 109 FPS.
• Medium: Average 122 FPS, with a minimum of 104 FPS and a maximum of 141 FPS.
• Low: Average 172 FPS.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Ultra: Average 125 FPS.
• High: Average 144 FPS.
• Medium: Average 162 FPS, with a minimum of 137 FPS and a maximum of 186 FPS.
• Low: Average 196 FPS.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: the performance penalty for moving from High to Ultra is significant, while the jump from Medium to High is more moderate. The Medium settings also show that the minimum FPS is relatively close to the average, indicating good frame pacing. This suggests that the combo can maintain a stable experience, even when the average frame rate is affected by heavy scenes. The 4K Ultra number of 64 FPS is the most demanding scenario, while 1080p Low at 196 FPS shows the setup's maximum potential. Overall, the measured results demonstrate a highly capable system that can be tuned to prioritize either visual quality or frame rate, depending on the user's preference.