Archeage
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 99 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 46 | 68 | 77 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 82 | 121 | 135 |
| 1080p Full HD | 82 | 119 | 175 | 200 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Archeage with Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis
# Archeage Performance Analysis: Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 9070
The measured data for Archeage with the Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Radeon RX 9070 reveals a system that handles this 2014 MMORPG with considerable headroom at lower resolutions, but hits a stark performance wall at 4K Ultra settings. This combination ranks 558th out of 1,727 tested combos in Archeage, placing it comfortably in the upper third of all configurations tested for this title. The benchmark rows show a clear pattern: the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution climbs, while the CPU's substantial resources remain largely underutilized in a game that rarely demands 24 cores and 32 threads.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and reveals where the bottleneck shifts. At Low settings, average FPS falls from 200.2 at 1920x1080 to 134.9 at 2560x1440, then down to 76.5 at 3840x2160 — a 62% reduction from 1080p to 4K. This scaling pattern suggests the GPU is doing progressively heavier lifting, with each pixel quadrupling at 4K compared to 1080p. The same trend appears at High settings: 119.1 at 1080p drops to 82.2 at 1440p and then to 46.2 at 4K, a 61% loss.
Ultra settings tell an even more telling story. The 82 FPS at 1080p collapses to 55.5 at 1440p and then to just 29 at 4K — a 65% drop from 1080p to 4K. This steep decline at Ultra settings indicates that the RX 9070's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are being stretched thin by the combination of high resolution and maximum graphical fidelity. Medium settings follow suit: 175.4 at 1080p, 121.1 at 1440p, and 67.6 at 4K.
The data implies that at 1080p, the CPU can still feed frames quickly enough, but the GPU is already working hard at 4K. The gap between Low and Ultra at each resolution widens as resolution increases, suggesting that the GPU's compute resources — 3,584 shading units and 128 ROPs — are the limiting factor at higher resolutions and quality presets.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9070, built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with a 4 nm process, brings substantial resources to Archeage. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, while boost clocks reach 2520 MHz and game clocks sit at 2070 MHz with a base of 1330 MHz. The GPU's 36.13 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 564.5 GTexel/s texture rate are more than adequate for a game released in 2014, yet the 4K Ultra result of 29 FPS shows that even this modern GPU struggles with maximum settings at the highest resolution.
The VRAM capacity is rarely a concern here — 16 GB is far beyond what Archeage likely needs at any resolution. The bottleneck appears to be raw rendering throughput rather than memory capacity. The pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and the 128 ROPs handle pixel fill, but the 56 ray accelerators are irrelevant for this title. The GPU's 79th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34,780, places it well above the median, yet the 4K Ultra result remains the weakest point in the measured data.
Comparing to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks, the RX 9070 sits within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 and 0.7% of the AMD Radeon HD 7970, though these comparisons use average benchmark scores rather than game-specific results. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 165,532 indicate a capable modern GPU, but Archeage's engine appears to favor raw fill rate over newer features.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination ranks 558th out of 1,727 tested combos in Archeage, placing it in the 68th percentile of all configurations. This is a solid result for a game that launched in 2014, when the i9-14900K's predecessor architecture was still years away. The CPU's 97th percentile ranking among all CPUs — with an average benchmark score of 79,824 — suggests the processor is far more powerful than this game requires, while the GPU's 79th percentile indicates the graphics card is the moderate performer in this pairing.
The i9-14900K's nearest CPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the AMD EPYC 7413 at 80,041 average score (0.3% ahead), the Intel Core i9-14900KF at 79,245 (0.7% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF at 79,240 (0.7% behind). These close margins confirm the i9-14900K is at the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy, but Archeage's measured FPS data shows the game does not leverage this advantage — the combo's rank is driven more by the GPU's capabilities at higher resolutions.
The 1,727 total combos tested means this pairing sits above roughly 1,169 other combinations. The data suggests that for Archeage specifically, pairing a slightly weaker CPU with a stronger GPU might yield better 4K results, since the game appears GPU-bound at that resolution.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Archeage?
A: The data shows 2560x1440 at Medium settings delivers 121.1 FPS average, which balances visual quality with smooth gameplay. At 1080p, even Ultra settings maintain 82 FPS, but 1440p Medium offers a better resolution-to-performance trade-off.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance in Archeage?
A: The i9-14900K's 24 cores and 32 threads are largely underutilized — the game's FPS scales more with resolution and settings than with CPU capability. At 1080p Low, the system hits 200.2 FPS, suggesting the CPU can feed frames well beyond typical display refresh rates.
Q: Is 4K Ultra playable with this hardware?
A: No, the measured 29 FPS average at 3840x2160 Ultra falls below smooth gameplay thresholds. However, 4K Low achieves 76.5 FPS, which is playable, and 4K Medium reaches 67.6 FPS.
Q: What causes the large FPS gap between Low and Ultra settings?
A: At 1080p, the gap is 118.2 FPS (200.2 vs 82), but at 4K it narrows to 47.5 FPS (76.5 vs 29). This indicates the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions, reducing the relative impact of settings changes.
Q: How does this combo compare to other tested configurations?
A: It ranks 558th out of 1,727 combos, putting it in the upper 32% of all tested systems for Archeage. The rank reflects balanced performance across resolutions, with no single setting producing an outlier result.
Q: Does the RX 9070's 16 GB VRAM matter for Archeage?
A: The 16 GB GDDR6 memory is far more than this 2014 title requires. The bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s is the more relevant factor, as the FPS drops at 4K suggest memory throughput limits rather than capacity constraints.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i9-14900K provides 24 cores and 32 threads with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz. Its 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core offer ample fast storage for game data. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,872 and a single-core score of 7,040, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 20,370 and single-core of 3,064.
For Archeage, the CPU's role appears minimal based on the FPS data. At 1080p Low, the 200.2 FPS result indicates the CPU can handle the game's logic and draw calls well beyond what most displays can show. The 24 cores and 32 threads are far more than an MMORPG from 2014 requires, and the 97th percentile CPU ranking confirms this is one of the most powerful processors available. The Passmark multi-thread score of 58,674 and single-thread score of 4,697 further demonstrate the CPU's capability.
The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks — the EPYC 7413, i9-14900KF, and Core Ultra 7 265KF — all score within 0.9% of the i9-14900K. This suggests that for Archeage, swapping to any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical FPS results, since the game is not CPU-limited in the measured scenarios. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is irrelevant for gaming when a discrete GPU is present, but its existence provides a fallback option.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data suggests that 2560x1440 at Medium settings provides the best experience, delivering 121.1 FPS average. This resolution maintains sharp image quality while the Medium preset balances GPU load effectively. At this setting, the FPS is high enough for smooth gameplay in an MMORPG, where large player gatherings and particle effects can cause sudden frame drops.
For players prioritizing frame rate above all else, 1920x1080 at Low settings hits 200.2 FPS, providing the maximum headroom for competitive play or crowded areas. However, this sacrifices visual fidelity significantly. The 1440p Medium setting offers 121.1 FPS, which is 39% faster than 1440p High at 82.2 FPS, making it a better choice for maintaining smooth performance.
At 4K, the Medium preset at 67.6 FPS is the highest playable option, as Ultra drops to 29 FPS and High sits at 46.2 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium at 4K costs only 8.9 FPS (76.5 to 67.6) while likely improving visuals considerably, making Medium the recommended 4K setting. At 1080p, Ultra at 82 FPS is the best visual choice while staying above 60 FPS, though players with 144 Hz displays may prefer High at 119.1 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the settings produce the following average FPS values: Low 200.2, Medium 175.4, High 119.1, and Ultra 82. The progression shows a steep drop from Medium to High (56.3 FPS loss) and another significant drop to Ultra (37.1 FPS loss), indicating that High and Ultra presets introduce substantial rendering costs. The 1080p results all exceed 60 FPS, making this resolution viable for every setting.
At 2560x1440, the values are: Low 134.9, Medium 121.1, High 82.2, and Ultra 55.5. The 1440p results show a similar pattern, with High costing 38.9 FPS compared to Medium, and Ultra dropping another 26.7 FPS. The 1440p Ultra result of 55.5 FPS falls just below the 60 FPS threshold, making it borderline for smooth gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the results are: Low 76.5, Medium 67.6, High 46.2, and Ultra 29. The 4K data reveals that only Low and Medium maintain playable frame rates above 60 FPS. The drop from Medium to High costs 21.4 FPS, while High to Ultra costs 17.2 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU's rendering limits are reached quickly at this resolution. Across all resolutions, the scaling from Low to Ultra consistently reduces FPS by roughly 60-65%, confirming the GPU as the primary performance limiter in Archeage for this hardware combination.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i9-14900K
AMD Radeon RX 9070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Archeage
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 76.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 67.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 46.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 134.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 121.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 82.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 55.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 200.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 175.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 119.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 82.0 |
Archeage with ii9-14900K + Other GPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Archeage with RX 9070 + Other CPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii9-14900K + RX 9070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.