Archeage

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB lands at rank 3247 out of 3708 tested combos in Archeage. That places it in the lower 12th percentile of all configurations measured for this game, a position that reflects a pairing with significant limitations. While the CPU is a strong modern part, the GPU's constrained memory and bandwidth hold this combo back from achieving competitive standing in this MMORPG. The data indicates this is a baseline 1080p setup that struggles when pushed beyond its comfort zone, and the benchmark results consistently show the GPU as the primary barrier to higher performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 3247 out of 3708 is a clear signal that this is not a high-performance configuration for Archeage. Approximately 87.5% of tested combinations outperform it, placing it firmly in the lower tier of results. This ranking is not a reflection of the CPU's capabilities, as the Intel Core i5-13400F is a capable processor with a 77th percentile ranking against all CPUs. Instead, the bottleneck is the GPU. The RTX 3050 4 GB sits at the 50th percentile for all GPUs, and its 4 GB memory capacity is a severe handicap for a game that scales with settings. The data shows a wide performance gap between this combo and the top performers, a gap that is almost entirely attributable to the graphics card. In practical terms, this rank means a user should expect a playable but modest experience, primarily at 1080p with adjusted settings, and should not anticipate high refresh rates or high-resolution gaming.

The CPU's benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 11068, show it is not the limiting factor. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS with a 0% delta, the Intel Core 5 120 with a -0.3% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D with a -0.3% delta. These rivals are statistically tied in CPU performance, meaning that swapping the CPU for any of these would not change the combo's ranking. The ranking is determined by the GPU, and the measured FPS data confirms this. The combo's low rank is a direct consequence of the GPU's inability to maintain high frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is the decisive component in this combo's performance. Its specifications reveal why it struggles. The GPU features a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1740 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. This is a modest amount of memory for modern gaming, and Archeage's settings clearly tax it. The GPU's 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs provide a baseline level of compute, but the memory subsystem is the primary constraint. The pixel rate of 55.68 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p, but they are insufficient for higher resolutions. The 7.127 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the raw compute capability, but it is not the limiting factor in the measured results.

The data shows that the GPU's role changes with settings. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 91 FPS, indicating the GPU is not fully saturated and the CPU is keeping up. However, at 1080p Ultra, the frame rate drops to 38 FPS, a massive reduction that points directly to the GPU's memory and bandwidth limits. At 4K Ultra, the combo manages only 14 FPS, which is unplayable. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is likely being exhausted at higher settings, causing the frame rate to crater. The 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is also insufficient for the data demands of 4K textures. The GPU's TDP of 90 W is low, which limits its power headroom, but the architecture is efficient. The end result is a GPU that is a solid entry-level part for esports titles but is out of its depth in a demanding MMORPG like Archeage at higher presets.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At 1080p High, the combo averages 55 FPS. Moving to 1440p High, the average drops to 37 FPS, a reduction of approximately 33%. At 4K High, the average is 21 FPS, a further reduction of about 43% from 1440p. This scaling is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the frame rate is directly tied to the number of pixels being rendered. The CPU, with its strong multi-core performance, is not the bottleneck at these resolutions. The data shows that the GPU's workload increases significantly with resolution, and its limited memory bandwidth (192.0 GB/s) and 4 GB capacity cannot keep up with the demand.

The scaling from Low settings is similar. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 91 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 61 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 35 FPS. This shows that even at the lowest settings, the GPU is still the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The frame rate at 4K Low (35 FPS) is lower than the frame rate at 1080p Ultra (38 FPS), which is a stark illustration of how resolution impacts performance more than settings. The limiting component is unequivocally the GPU. The CPU's single-thread score of 960 in 3DMark and a Passmark single-thread score of 3634 are sufficient for the game's logic, but the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are overwhelmed. This resolution scaling indicates that the combo is only viable for 1080p gaming, with 1440p being a stretch and 4K being impractical.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at the combo's performance across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low settings yield 91 FPS average, Medium settings yield 81 FPS average with a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 93 FPS, High settings yield 55 FPS average, and Ultra settings yield 38 FPS average. This data shows a smooth degradation from Low to Ultra, with a significant drop from Medium to High (26 FPS) and another from High to Ultra (17 FPS). The Medium preset is the sweet spot for 1080p, offering a solid 81 FPS average with a minimum above 60 FPS, which is comfortable for most displays. The High preset at 55 FPS is playable but less smooth, and Ultra at 38 FPS is borderline for a competitive experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops considerably. Low settings average 61 FPS, Medium settings average 55 FPS with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 63 FPS, High settings average 37 FPS, and Ultra settings average 25 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p is the only one that provides a consistently playable frame rate (55 FPS average, 46 FPS minimum). Low is also acceptable at 61 FPS. High and Ultra are not recommended, as they fall below 40 FPS and 30 FPS respectively, which will result in noticeable stuttering in a fast-paced MMORPG. At 3840x2160, the results are poor across the board. Low settings average 35 FPS, Medium settings average 31 FPS with a minimum of 27 FPS and a maximum of 36 FPS, High settings average 21 FPS, and Ultra settings average 14 FPS. None of these are playable for a smooth experience; even the Low preset at 35 FPS will feel choppy.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings for this combo are at 1920x1080 with the Medium preset. This configuration yields an average FPS of 81 with a minimum of 69 FPS, ensuring a stable and responsive experience. The jump from Medium to High costs 26 FPS on average, which is a substantial loss for a visual improvement that is often negligible in a game like Archeage. The Ultra preset at 1080p is not recommended, as the 38 FPS average is too low for smooth gameplay. For users with 1440p monitors, the Medium preset is the highest playable option, offering a 55 FPS average and a 46 FPS minimum. This will be a less fluid experience than 1080p Medium, but it is still within a playable range. The Low preset at 1440p is also viable at 61 FPS, but the visual quality reduction is significant.

For users prioritizing frame rate stability, the 1080p Low preset at 91 FPS average is the best choice, providing a high refresh rate experience. However, the visual fidelity will be notably lower. The 1080p Medium preset is the best balance of visual quality and performance, as it maintains a 69 FPS minimum, which is above the 60 FPS threshold that most gamers consider smooth. The data shows that the combo cannot handle High or Ultra settings at any resolution without dropping below 55 FPS, which is the point where motion becomes less fluid. Therefore, the recommendation is to use 1080p Medium for the best experience, and to drop to 1440p Medium only if a higher resolution is desired and the user can tolerate a 46 FPS minimum. Avoid 4K entirely, as all presets are below 35 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings for this combo in Archeage?

A: The best experience is at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, which delivers an average FPS of 81 with a minimum of 69 FPS. This provides a smooth and stable frame rate that is well-suited for the game's mechanics.

Q: Can this combo handle 1440p gaming in Archeage?

A: Yes, but only with lower settings. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset achieves a 55 FPS average and a 46 FPS minimum, which is playable. The Low preset is also viable at 61 FPS. High and Ultra settings at 1440p are not recommended due to frame rates below 40 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with the RTX 3050 4 GB in this game?

A: No, 4K gaming is not practical. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 35 on Low settings, and it drops to 14 FPS on Ultra. All 4K presets produce frame rates below the playable threshold of 60 FPS, making the experience choppy.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-13400F the bottleneck in this combo?

A: No, the data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU has strong benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604, and its nearest rivals show a 0% to -0.3% delta in performance. The frame rates scale heavily with resolution and settings, which is a sign of GPU limitation, not CPU limitation.

Q: How does the combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 3247 out of 3708 tested combos, placing it in the lower 12th percentile. This is a low ranking due to the GPU's limitations, despite the CPU being a capable part with a 77th percentile ranking against all CPUs.

Q: What is the difference in performance between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 91 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 38 FPS. This is a difference of 53 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset imposes a heavy load on the GPU, likely due to its 4 GB memory capacity and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth being insufficient for the higher texture and effect demands.