Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Undisputed
Sports 2023

Undisputed

86%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
195 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
75 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
141 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
34 FPS
8.6ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,549
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 27,247
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 53 64 89
1440p QHD 54 84 102 141
1080p Full HD 75 116 141 195

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 116
1920x1080 Low 195
1920x1080 Medium 141
1920x1080 Ultra 75
2560x1440 High 84
2560x1440 Low 141
2560x1440 Medium 102
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 53
3840x2160 Low 89
3840x2160 Medium 64
3840x2160 Ultra 34

Performance Analysis: Undisputed on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2986th out of 3718 tested combos for Undisputed, placing it in the lower third of all tested systems. This rank reflects a pairing of a high-end CPU with a mid-range graphics card, where the GPU becomes the decisive factor for frame rates in this sports title. The data shows that while the processor is capable of feeding the graphics card effectively, the Arc B570’s performance ceiling determines what settings are viable at each resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2986 out of 3718 means this system sits below the median of all tested configurations. In percentile terms, this is roughly the 19.7th percentile of tested combos, indicating that most other hardware pairings deliver higher average frame rates in Undisputed. This is not a result of CPU weakness; the Ryzen 7 9700F has a PassMark single-thread score of 4691 and a multithread score of 36470, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Rather, the Intel Arc B570’s 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556, caps overall performance.

The ranking becomes clearer when examining the GPU’s direct rivals. The Arc B570 scores within 0.5% of several comparable graphics cards, including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.1), Intel Arc A750 (deltaPct -0.1), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (deltaPct 0.4), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (deltaPct -0.5). This clustering around the 20,500 average score mark means the frame rates seen here are representative of a broad mid-range GPU tier. The CPU, meanwhile, sits in a different league entirely, with its nearest rivals being the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (deltaPct 0.2), Intel Core i7-14700KF (deltaPct -0.2), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (deltaPct 0.7), and Intel Core i7-14700K (deltaPct 0.9) — all within 1% of the 9700F’s average score of 69996.

Given this configuration, the measured data shows that Undisputed is playable at 4K only on Low and Medium settings, while 1440p and 1080p offer more headroom. The 60 FPS threshold is cleared at 4K Medium with an average of 64 FPS, but the jump to High drops the average to 53 FPS. This pattern indicates that the Arc B570’s 10 GB GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for moderate settings but become limiting factors at higher quality presets.

CPU and GPU Roles

Benchmark results indicate a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 7 9700F and the Arc B570 across resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU has more influence because frame rates are higher, and the processor must keep up with the GPU’s output. The data shows 1080p Low averages 195 FPS, which drops to 116 FPS at High and 75 FPS at Ultra. These numbers suggest that the CPU is not the bottleneck at lower settings — the Arc B570 is still producing well above 144 FPS at Low — but the gap between Low and Ultra (195 to 75 FPS) indicates that GPU load scales significantly with preset quality.

At 1440p, the GPU’s role becomes more dominant. The average frame rate at Low is 141 FPS, falling to 84 FPS at High and 54 FPS at Ultra. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a roughly 28% reduction in average FPS at Low settings (195 to 141) and a 28% reduction at High (116 to 84). This consistent drop points to the GPU being the primary constraint, as the CPU has ample headroom given its 8 cores and 16 threads.

The situation intensifies at 4K. Here, the Arc B570’s memory bandwidth and compute resources are heavily taxed. Low settings produce 89 FPS, Medium drops to 64 FPS, High falls to 53 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 34 FPS. The scaling between resolutions is steep: from 1440p Low (141 FPS) to 4K Low (89 FPS) is a 37% reduction. This pattern confirms that for Undisputed, the GPU determines playability at 4K, while the CPU comfortably handles the game’s physics and AI at all tested resolutions. The Ryzen 7 9700F’s single-thread performance, ranking in the 94th percentile, ensures that even at 1080p High with 116 FPS average, there is no processor-induced frame pacing issue.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Undisputed at 4K?

A: Yes, but only on Low or Medium settings. The measured data shows 4K Low averages 89 FPS and 4K Medium averages 64 FPS, both above the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings at 4K drop to 53 FPS, which fails the threshold.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 84 FPS, which is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS. Medium averages 102 FPS and Low averages 141 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while maintaining smooth performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and presets. Evidence shows that at 4K Ultra, the average frame rate is 34 FPS, while the CPU’s performance percentile (94th) far exceeds the GPU’s (65th). The Ryzen 7 9700F’s strong single-thread score of 4691 means it is not the bottleneck.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, which is within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534), Intel Arc A750 (20582), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662). This indicates near-identical raw performance among these cards.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p Ultra?

A: The measured average is 75 FPS, with no minimum or maximum values recorded for this setting. This clears the 60 FPS threshold, making Ultra playable at 1080p.

Q: Does the game support high refresh rate monitors at 1080p?

A: At Low settings, the average FPS is 195, and at Medium it is 141 FPS. These figures exceed 144 Hz, meaning the combo can drive high refresh rate displays at lower presets, though Ultra’s 75 FPS average is more typical for a 60–75 Hz panel.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Ryzen 7 9700F’s nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average benchmark score of 69996. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515 (0.7% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69355 (0.9% lower). In practice, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Undisputed, as the game is not CPU-bound at the tested resolutions. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration of the 9700F, with its 32 MB shared L3 cache, is more than adequate for this title.

On the GPU side, the Arc B570’s performance is essentially matched by four cards. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.1% faster) and Intel Arc A750 (20582, 0.1% slower) are the closest equivalents. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, 0.4% faster) and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, 0.5% slower) also fall within the same performance band. Users with any of these GPUs paired with a similarly performing CPU would see comparable FPS numbers in Undisputed. The Arc B570’s 10 GB memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are the defining characteristics, and the nearest rivals have similar memory configurations, though exact specifications are not listed in the data.

The practical implication is that this combo behaves like a mid-range GPU system. At 1440p, the best playable setting is High with 84 FPS, which aligns with the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14195. The CPU’s high percentile ranking (94th) means that upgrading the GPU would yield immediate improvements, while swapping the CPU for a rival model would produce negligible changes in frame rates.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Medium. The measured average is 64 FPS, with a minimum of 55 FPS and a maximum of 74 FPS. Low settings also exceed the threshold at 89 FPS, but Medium provides better visual fidelity while still clearing the playable mark. High and Ultra fail the threshold, averaging 53 FPS and 34 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440, High settings are the best choice, delivering an average of 84 FPS. Medium averages 102 FPS, and Low averages 141 FPS, but High offers the optimal balance of quality and performance. Ultra drops to 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and therefore not recommended.

For 1920x1080, Ultra settings are playable with an average of 75 FPS. This is the highest preset that clears the threshold, making it the best setting for this resolution. Lower presets provide higher frame rates (High at 116 FPS, Medium at 141 FPS, Low at 195 FPS) but are unnecessary given that Ultra already maintains smooth performance.

The Verdict

This PC can run Undisputed, but the playable settings vary significantly by resolution. At 3840x2160, the verdict is limited: only Low and Medium settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Medium being the best option at an average of 64 FPS. High and Ultra are not playable, as they fall to 53 FPS and 34 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440, the system performs better. High settings are playable at 84 FPS, making this the best setting for this resolution. Low (141 FPS) and Medium (102 FPS) also exceed the threshold, but Ultra at 54 FPS fails the playability requirement.

The strongest performance is at 1920x1080, where all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable. Ultra settings average 75 FPS, which is the best quality option that remains above 60 FPS. This means that for gamers using a 1080p display, the full visual experience is available without compromising frame rate.

Overall, the data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming with maximum settings, or 1440p gaming with High settings. For 4K displays, users must accept Medium or Low presets to maintain smooth gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured results are as follows: High settings produce an average of 53 FPS, with no minimum or maximum recorded. Low settings average 89 FPS, also without min/max data. Medium settings show an average of 64 FPS, with a minimum of 55 FPS and a maximum of 74 FPS. Ultra settings average 34 FPS, with no min/max values.

For 2560x1440, High settings average 84 FPS, Low averages 141 FPS, Medium averages 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS and maximum of 117 FPS, and Ultra averages 54 FPS. The min/max data for High, Low, and Ultra are not provided.

At 1920x1080, the results are: High averages 116 FPS, Low averages 195 FPS, Medium averages 141 FPS with a minimum of 120 FPS and maximum of 162 FPS, and Ultra averages 75 FPS. The min/max values for High, Low, and Ultra are absent from the data.

The pattern across resolutions shows that only Medium settings at each resolution include min/max FPS data. This suggests that the medium preset was tested with more detailed frame time capture, while other presets recorded only average frame rates. The minimum and maximum values for 4K Medium (55–74 FPS) indicate some frame pacing variance, but the average remains above the playable threshold. At 1440p Medium, the range is 86–117 FPS, showing a wider spread. At 1080p Medium, the range is 120–162 FPS, which is consistent with the higher average frame rate. These figures confirm that the Arc B570 maintains stable performance within each preset, with no severe drops below the playable threshold at the recommended settings.