Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Thief
Stealth 2014

Thief

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
147 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
81 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
100 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
59 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
61 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
34 FPS
11.6ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,499
Your CPU 70,163
Graphics Card
Required 27,801
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 34 48 61
1440p QHD 59 58 78 100
1080p Full HD 81 86 112 147

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 86
1920x1080 Low 147
1920x1080 Medium 112
1920x1080 Ultra 81
2560x1440 High 58
2560x1440 Low 100
2560x1440 Medium 78
2560x1440 Ultra 59
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Low 61
3840x2160 Medium 48
3840x2160 Ultra 34

Performance Analysis: Thief on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700KF and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a highly capable Thief experience, but the playable envelope is strictly defined by resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, this combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, including Ultra with an average of 80.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system remains comfortably playable at Medium settings (78.4 FPS) but drops to 58.6 FPS at Ultra, just shy of the 60 FPS mark. At 3840x2160, only Low settings (61 FPS) manage to hit the playable threshold, with Medium and Ultra falling to 48.4 FPS and 34.3 FPS respectively. The data indicates a system that excels at mainstream resolutions but struggles to maintain high fidelity at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear, resolution-by-resolution picture of performance. At 3840x2160, the averages are as follows: Low settings produce 61 FPS, Medium 48.4 FPS, High 34.4 FPS, and Ultra 34.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 12.6 FPS, while the drop from Medium to High is a steeper 14 FPS. High and Ultra are nearly identical, differing by only 0.1 FPS, suggesting a rendering bottleneck that limits scaling beyond Medium. Notably, the 4K Ultra result is essentially tied with the High preset, indicating that the GPU is maxed out before the highest quality settings are even applied.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales more gracefully. Low settings average 100.3 FPS, Medium 78.4 FPS, High 57.5 FPS, and Ultra 58.6 FPS. Interestingly, Ultra slightly outperforms High by 1.1 FPS, which is within measurement variance but still notable. The step from Low to Medium is a 21.9 FPS drop, while the step from Medium to High is 20.9 FPS. The High and Ultra results both fall below the 60 FPS threshold, making Medium the highest playable preset at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the combination shows its strength. Low settings deliver 146.8 FPS, Medium 112.1 FPS, High 86.1 FPS, and Ultra 80.7 FPS. All presets clear the 60 FPS threshold with substantial headroom. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 66.1 FPS reduction, but even the worst-case Ultra result remains 20.7 FPS above the playable threshold. The data shows diminishing returns on quality settings: the difference between Medium and High is 26 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is only 5.4 FPS, meaning Ultra is a relatively cheap upgrade in performance terms.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i7-14700KF and the Intel Arc B580. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant constraint. The near-identical FPS between High (34.4) and Ultra (34.3) indicates that the Arc B580 reaches its rendering ceiling regardless of minor quality tweaks. The scaling from Low to Medium at this resolution (61 to 48.4 FPS) shows that moderate settings changes still impact the GPU, but beyond that, the card is saturated. The Core i7-14700KF, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is not a limiting factor here; its high benchmark scores (e.g., 44167 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) suggest it has ample headroom for feeding the GPU.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The 57.5 FPS at High and 58.6 FPS at Ultra show that the GPU still governs performance, but the gap between presets widens compared to 4K. The 21.9 FPS drop from Low to Medium indicates that the GPU is still the primary bottleneck, but the CPU's role becomes more relevant as resolution decreases. At 1920x1080, the CPU's influence becomes more apparent. The 146.8 FPS at Low settings suggests the CPU can push high frame rates, but the Arc B580's rendering capacity caps the Ultra result at 80.7 FPS. The data shows a system where the GPU is the limiting factor at all resolutions, but the CPU's headroom ensures no additional bottleneck is introduced, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates exceed 100 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearestRivals data for the CPU, the Intel Core i7-14700KF sits in a tight performance cluster. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has an average score of 69996, just 0.2% lower than the Core i7-14700KF's 70163. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is 0.4% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.9% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is 1% ahead with a score of 70879. In practice, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Thief, as the game's CPU demands are modest relative to what these processors offer. The Core i7-14700KF's 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs means that swapping to any of these rivals would not change the playable settings at any resolution.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580's nearest rivals are a more mixed group. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP has an average score of 23061, which is 0.2% higher than the Arc B580's 23021. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 0.6% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA P106-100 is 1% higher. These deltas are all within 1%, meaning that in Thief, the Arc B580 would perform essentially identically to these cards. A user with an RTX 3080 would see the same 34.4 FPS at 4K High and the same 80.7 FPS at 1080p Ultra. The practical takeaway is that this GPU's performance tier is well-established, and the Arc B580 is firmly in that bracket.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2827 out of 3720 tested combinations. This places it in the 76th percentile (calculated from the rank and total combos). That ranking is lower than what the individual components might suggest, given the CPU's 94th percentile and the GPU's 68th percentile. The discrepancy arises because the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming performance. While the Core i7-14700KF is a top-tier processor, the Arc B580's 68th percentile GPU ranking pulls the overall combo down. In the context of Thief specifically, this rank means that a significant number of other CPU-GPU combos can achieve higher frame rates, particularly at 4K. However, the ranking also reflects that this combo is far from the bottom, and for a game like Thief with a 2014 release date, the hardware is more than adequate for mainstream play.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Thief, but the experience depends heavily on the target resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at all four presets, with Ultra averaging 80.7 FPS. This is the optimal resolution for this hardware, offering smooth gameplay without compromise. At 2560x1440, the system is playable at Low (100.3 FPS) and Medium (78.4 FPS), but High (57.5 FPS) and Ultra (58.6 FPS) fall short of the 60 FPS threshold. For a consistent 60+ FPS experience at 1440p, stick to Medium settings. At 3840x2160, only Low settings (61 FPS) are playable; Medium (48.4 FPS), High (34.4 FPS), and Ultra (34.3 FPS) all miss the mark. The verdictByResolution confirms this: 1080p allows all settings, 1440p allows Low and Medium, and 4K allows only Low. The data shows a system best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring significant settings compromises.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Thief at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: Yes. The measured average at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 80.7 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by 20.7 FPS.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: Medium settings, with an average of 78.4 FPS. High and Ultra both fall below 60 FPS (57.5 and 58.6 respectively), so Medium is the highest preset that maintains playability.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?

A: Only at Low settings, which average 61 FPS at 3840x2160. Medium drops to 48.4 FPS, and High/Ultra fall to 34.4/34.3 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in Thief?

A: The two GPUs have nearly identical average benchmark scores (23021 for the Arc B580 vs 23172 for the RTX 3080, a 0.7% difference). In Thief, they would produce effectively the same frame rates at all resolutions and settings.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile relative to all tested CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF ranks in the 94th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 70163. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, is only 0.2% behind.

Q: Does the combo's rank in Thief indicate poor overall performance?

A: The combo ranks 2827 out of 3720, placing it in the 76th percentile. This is respectable but not top-tier, reflecting the GPU's 68th percentile ranking as the limiting factor. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking ensures no CPU-side bottleneck, but the GPU caps overall gaming performance.