Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Thief
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 33 | 43 | 57 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 56 | 74 | 97 |
| 1080p Full HD | 78 | 82 | 108 | 142 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Thief on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop combination built around a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake processor and a 6 GB GDDR6 Turing graphics card. The database contains measured frame rates for Thief, a stealth title released in early 2014, across three resolutions and four quality presets. This analysis interprets those measurements, the CPU and GPU roles, the verdict for playability, and how this combo ranks among tested systems.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Thief?
A: At 1920x1080, every preset (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) stays at or above 78 FPS average, with Low reaching 142 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low and Medium presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Medium at 74 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS; the best recorded average is 57 FPS on Low.
Q: How does the RTX 2060 perform relative to other GPUs in the database?
A: The RTX 2060 sits at the 58th percentile among all tested GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 15290, which places it within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15171) and 0.6% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199). The closest match is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283, a 0% difference.
Q: What is the CPU's standing among all processors?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700F ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 53620. The nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 6505P at 53701, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, 0.6% lower, and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, 0.8% lower.
Q: Does this combo run Thief at Ultra settings in 1080p?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the measured average FPS is 78, which exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at that resolution.
Q: Which component is more limiting at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The average FPS drops from 57 on Low to 31 on Ultra, a decline of 26 FPS. The CPU, ranked in the 91st percentile, is unlikely to bottleneck at these lower frame rates; the recorded data indicates the graphics card cannot maintain 60 FPS even on Low settings.
Q: Are there any recorded minimum or maximum FPS values?
A: Yes, but only for Medium presets. At 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum is 91 FPS and the maximum is 124 FPS. At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 63 FPS and the maximum is 85 FPS. At 3840x2160 Medium, the minimum is 37 FPS and the maximum is 50 FPS. Other presets have only average FPS recorded.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the Intel Core i7-14700F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 shifts with resolution and preset. At lower resolutions, the CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores matter more because the GPU can produce frames quickly. The processor's Cinebench R23 single-core score is 4958, and its multi-core score is 35122, both well above typical mid-range CPUs. In contrast, the GPU's Passmark G3D score is 14111, which is modest for modern titles.
At 1920x1080, the transition from Low to Ultra changes average FPS from 142 to 78, a 64 FPS drop. This 45% reduction indicates that the GPU is increasingly taxed as settings rise, while the CPU has enough headroom to feed the graphics card. The fact that Low hits 142 FPS suggests the CPU can support very high frame rates when the GPU load is light.
At 2560x1440, the average FPS on Low is 97, which is 45 FPS lower than at 1080p Low. At Medium, the average is 74, down from 108 at 1080p. This scaling shows that pixel count directly impacts the GPU's workload. The CPU, with 20 cores and 28 threads, is not the primary limiter here; the recorded data points to the RTX 2060's 6 GB memory and 192-bit bus as the constraining factors, though the database does not provide memory utilization figures.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The average FPS on Low is 57, just below the playability threshold, and on Ultra it falls to 31. The CPU's high percentile rank (91st) does not translate into higher frame rates at 4K because the graphics card cannot render enough pixels per second. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at the same preset shows a dramatic drop: for High settings, 82 FPS at 1080p falls to 56 FPS at 1440p and then 33 FPS at 4K. This pattern is typical for a GPU-bound scenario.
The data also shows that the CPU matters more at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 142 FPS, a number that likely approaches the CPU's output limit for this game. At 4K Ultra, the 31 FPS average leaves the CPU largely idle, waiting for the GPU. Therefore, for Thief, the RTX 2060 is the decisive component at 1440p and above, while the i7-14700F provides ample headroom at 1080p.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The database records average FPS for all resolution and preset combinations, with minimum and maximum values only for Medium settings.
At 1920x1080, the results are:
- Low: 142 average FPS
- Medium: 108 average FPS, with a minimum of 91 and a maximum of 124
- High: 82 average FPS
- Ultra: 78 average FPS
The spread from Low to Ultra is 64 FPS, and even the minimum FPS on Medium (91) exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. This resolution is fully playable across all presets.
At 2560x1440, the results are:
- Low: 97 average FPS
- Medium: 74 average FPS, with a minimum of 63 and a maximum of 85
- High: 56 average FPS
- Ultra: 54 average FPS
The Medium preset's minimum of 63 FPS just clears the playability threshold, while the averages for High and Ultra fall below 60. The difference between Low and Ultra is 43 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the results are:
- Low: 57 average FPS
- Medium: 43 average FPS, with a minimum of 37 and a maximum of 50
- High: 33 average FPS
- Ultra: 31 average FPS
No preset at 4K reaches the 60 FPS average needed for playability. The Low preset comes closest at 57 FPS, but the Medium preset's minimum of 37 FPS indicates significant frame drops during gameplay.
The data shows a consistent pattern: each resolution step from 1080p to 1440p to 4K reduces average FPS by roughly 30% to 40% at the same preset. For example, High settings go from 82 to 56 to 33 FPS. This linear degradation is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload.
The Verdict
The question of whether this PC can run Thief depends entirely on the target resolution. The playability threshold is set at 60 FPS average.
At 1920x1080, the answer is a clear yes. All four presets, Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, produce average FPS above 60. The best playable setting is Ultra at 78 FPS average, which also means the system has some headroom for future driver updates or background tasks.
At 2560x1440, the answer is a conditional yes. The database lists Low and Medium as playable settings, with Medium being the best at 74 FPS average. High and Ultra fall short at 56 and 54 FPS respectively. Gamers who prioritize visual quality over frame rate might still choose High, but the recorded data places the 60 FPS boundary between Medium and High.
At 3840x2160, the answer is no. No preset achieves 60 FPS average. The closest is Low at 57 FPS, which is 3 FPS short of the threshold. The verdict field for 4K lists no playable settings. Users with a 4K display would need to reduce resolution or accept sub-60 frame rates.
In summary, this combo is a solid 1080p and capable 1440p machine for Thief, but it cannot handle 4K at playable speeds. The RTX 2060, despite being ranked at the 58th GPU percentile, delivers strong results for a 2019-era card when paired with a high-end 2024 CPU.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS average is identified from the measured data.
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 78. This is the highest quality preset available, and it stays well above the playability threshold. The minimum FPS for Ultra is not recorded, but the average suggests consistent performance.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are Medium, with an average FPS of 74. The minimum FPS for this preset is 63, which also clears the threshold, indicating that frame drops are unlikely to go below 60. High settings at 56 FPS average are not recommended for strict 60 FPS play.
At 3840x2160, no preset qualifies. The best recorded average is 57 FPS on Low, which falls short of the threshold. Therefore, there are no best settings at this resolution; the system should be used at lower resolutions for Thief.
These recommendations align with the verdict data: 1080p Ultra, 1440p Medium, and no 4K option. The gap between 1440p Medium (74 FPS) and 1440p High (56 FPS) is 18 FPS, which is significant for a stealth game where smooth traversal matters.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of CPU and GPU ranks 2927 out of 3720 combos for Thief. This places it in the 78.7th percentile overall, meaning roughly 21% of tested systems perform better in this game.
The rank is lower than the CPU's individual percentile (91st) and higher than the GPU's individual percentile (58th). This discrepancy suggests that the game's performance is more dependent on the GPU than the CPU, which matches the measured FPS scaling across resolutions. A combo with a weaker CPU but a stronger GPU would likely rank higher in Thief, though the database does not provide such direct comparisons.
The rank of 2927 out of 3720 also indicates that many modern systems, likely those with newer GPUs, outperform this combo. However, for a game released in 2014, the absolute performance is still adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as the FPS data shows.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The database provides nearest rivals for both the CPU and GPU based on average benchmark scores. These alternatives would likely produce similar frame rates in Thief, assuming no other bottlenecks.
For the CPU, the Intel Core i7-14700F has an average score of 53620. The nearest rivals are:
- Intel Xeon 6505P: score 53701, 0.2% higher
- Intel Xeon Phi 7290: score 53469, 0.3% lower
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900X: score 53288, 0.6% lower
- AMD EPYC 7313P: score 53206, 0.8% lower
These processors are within 1% of the i7-14700F's score, so swapping to any of them would have a negligible effect on Thief's frame rates, especially since the game is GPU-bound at higher resolutions.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 has an average score of 15290. The nearest rivals are:
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580: score 15283, 0% difference
- AMD Radeon 680M: score 15270, 0.1% lower
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM: score 15199, 0.6% lower
- AMD Radeon RX 7600: score 15171, 0.8% lower
These graphics cards would deliver nearly identical performance in Thief. The GTX 580 is an older card, but its score matches the RTX 2060 almost exactly. The RX 7600, a more modern card, is 0.8% slower in aggregate benchmarks, which would translate to a frame rate difference of less than 1 FPS in most scenarios.
It is important to note that these rival scores are aggregate benchmarks, not Thief-specific measurements. Actual game performance can vary based on driver optimization and API support. The RTX 2060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, while the GTX 580 does not, which could affect newer titles but likely not Thief, a 2014 game built around older APIs.
In practice, any of these alternative GPUs or CPUs would produce similar results in the measured FPS table. The combination of a high-end CPU and a mid-range GPU is the defining characteristic of this setup, and the alternatives listed here preserve that balance.