Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Thief
Stealth 2014

Thief

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
214 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
135 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
170 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
91 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
97 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
57 FPS
7ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,499
Your CPU 46,881
Graphics Card
Required 27,801
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 57 76 97
1440p QHD 91 95 127 170
1080p Full HD 135 143 186 214

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 143
1920x1080 Low 214
1920x1080 Medium 186
1920x1080 Ultra 135
2560x1440 High 95
2560x1440 Low 170
2560x1440 Medium 127
2560x1440 Ultra 91
3840x2160 High 57
3840x2160 Low 97
3840x2160 Medium 76
3840x2160 Ultra 57

Performance Analysis: Thief on Your System

Can Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 run Thief? The benchmark data indicates a resounding yes, with this combination delivering playable frame rates across all tested resolutions and settings. The pairing proves particularly potent at 1440p and 1080p, where it achieves triple-digit averages even on the highest preset, while 4K remains viable through medium settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system exhibits exceptional headroom. The Low preset produces an average of 213.9 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded across the entire test suite. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 185.6 FPS, while High maintains 143.4 FPS. The most demanding Ultra preset still yields a robust 134.7 FPS average, indicating that the CPU-GPU combination is far from strained at this resolution.

The 2560x1440 results show a predictable scaling pattern. Low settings deliver 169.6 FPS average, and Medium reduces this to 126.8 FPS. High settings record 95 FPS, with Ultra trailing at 90.7 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra costs approximately 44 FPS, a substantial drop but one that leaves performance firmly above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits. The Low preset achieves 96.5 FPS average, which is still highly playable. Medium settings produce 76 FPS, while High and Ultra both land near the critical threshold: 57.4 FPS and 57 FPS respectively. These two presets are statistically identical, indicating a GPU bottleneck that prevents meaningful scaling beyond medium settings. The data shows no minimum or maximum frame time measurements, so the analysis relies solely on average FPS figures.

CPU and GPU Roles

The frame rate scaling between resolutions reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior. At 1080p, the substantial gap between Low (213.9 FPS) and Ultra (134.7 FPS) suggests the GPU is the primary constraint, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames. The Intel Core i7-13700K, with its 16 cores and 24 threads, demonstrates strong single-thread performance in synthetic benchmarks, scoring 1136 in 3dmark single-thread and 2116 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which supports the notion that CPU limitations are minimal at lower resolutions.

As resolution increases to 1440p, the performance delta between presets narrows in absolute terms but remains proportionally similar. The 79 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is consistent with GPU-bound scaling. However, at 4K, the pattern changes dramatically. The difference between Low (96.5 FPS) and Medium (76 FPS) is 20.5 FPS, but the jump from Medium to High (57.4 FPS) is 18.6 FPS, and High to Ultra (57 FPS) is negligible. This plateau indicates that the RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are saturated, making the GPU the dominant factor at 4K regardless of CPU capability.

The CPU's influence is most apparent in the 1080p Low preset, where the 213.9 FPS average suggests the processor can sustain very high frame rates. The i7-13700K's multi-threaded scores, including 30745 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 45887 in Passmark multithread, provide ample processing power for game logic and draw calls. At 4K, the GPU's 68 RT cores and 8704 shading units become the limiting factor, as evidenced by the minimal FPS difference between High and Ultra settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination ranks 722nd out of 3720 tested configurations, placing it in the top 20% of all systems evaluated for Thief. This percentile position is notably higher than the individual component percentiles would suggest — the CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The synergy between the two components produces results that exceed what either part alone might indicate.

The ranking reflects the game's release date from 2014, meaning modern hardware is largely overqualified. The RTX 3080's Passmark G3D score of 25086 and the i7-13700K's average benchmark score of 46881 place this system well above the requirements for a game of this era. The 722nd rank out of 3720 combinations suggests that while many systems can run Thief, this particular pairing offers headroom that allows for maximum settings at most resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 4K?

A: Medium settings at 3840x2160 produce an average of 76 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold. High and Ultra both fall below at 57.4 FPS and 57 FPS respectively.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 1440p on Ultra?

A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 delivers 90.7 FPS average, well above the 60 FPS threshold. All four settings — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at this resolution.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 134.7 at 1080p to 57 at 4K, a reduction of 77.7 FPS or roughly 58%. At Low settings, the drop is from 213.9 FPS to 96.5 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at 1080p. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1136 in 3dmark single-thread) allows it to keep up, but the RTX 3080's frame generation capability determines the final output, as shown by the 79.2 FPS spread between Low and Ultra presets.

Q: Does the 10 GB VRAM cause any issues at 4K?

A: The data shows no VRAM-related stutters or min FPS anomalies, as the game from 2014 has modest memory requirements. The RTX 3080's 760.3 GB/s bandwidth appears sufficient for all tested presets.

Q: What is the best settings choice for a 60 Hz 4K monitor?

A: Medium settings at 3840x2160, which yield 76 FPS average, provide the highest quality preset that stays above 60 FPS. High settings fall below the threshold at 57.4 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which scores 46971 (0.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 at 47022 (0.3% lower). The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Xeon w3-2535 both score 46654 and 46653 respectively, each 0.5% above the i7-13700K's 46881 average. These processors would deliver near-identical frame rates in Thief, as the game is unlikely to differentiate between such close performers.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100 with an average score of 23249 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23250 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23273 (0.4% lower). The AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276 (0.4% lower). All four alternatives fall within a fraction of a percent of the RTX 3080's 23172 average score, meaning they would produce nearly identical frame rates in Thief at all resolutions and settings. Users upgrading from any of these GPUs to the RTX 3080 would see minimal performance changes in this specific title.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the optimal choice, delivering 134.7 FPS average. This is the most demanding setting and remains far above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the clear recommendation for full HD displays. Even with maximum graphical fidelity, the system has 74.7 FPS of headroom.

For 2560x1440, Ultra settings again provide the best experience at 90.7 FPS average. The 30.7 FPS margin above the playability threshold ensures smooth gameplay without compromising visual quality. All four presets are playable, but Ultra offers the highest fidelity without sacrificing performance.

At 3840x2160, Medium settings are the recommended maximum, producing 76 FPS average. This provides a 16 FPS buffer above the 60 FPS threshold. While Low settings achieve 96.5 FPS, the visual quality trade-off is unnecessary given the acceptable performance of Medium. High and Ultra presets both fall below 60 FPS (57.4 and 57 respectively), making them unsuitable for consistent 4K play. The system's verdict data confirms Medium as the best 4K setting, balancing frame rate and graphical detail.