Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Thief
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 83 | 86 | 117 | 145 |
| 1440p QHD | 140 | 143 | 159 | 173 |
| 1080p Full HD | 157 | 163 | 177 | 196 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Thief on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is an exceptionally high-end combination for running Thief, a 2014 stealth title. Benchmark data shows this pairing delivers playable frame rates at every tested resolution and preset, with the RTX 5090 providing substantial headroom even at 4K Ultra settings. The following analysis breaks down the performance characteristics, alternative components, and optimal settings based strictly on measured data.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Thief at 4K resolution with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combination achieves an average of 82.6 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings at the same resolution yield 85.6 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. It is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403, -0.1% delta), the Intel Core 5 213PE (35428, -0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, 0.2% delta), showing near-identical performance to its direct competitors.
Q: What is the performance gap between the RTX 5090 and its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The RTX 5090 scores 79842 on average, in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79605), 0.6% ahead of the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79396), and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78940). The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959, which is 1.4% higher.
Q: Which resolution shows the largest performance drop for this game?
A: The data shows a significant scaling penalty when moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160. At Ultra settings, frame rates drop from 139.5 FPS at 1440p to 82.6 FPS at 4K, a reduction of approximately 41%. The drop from 1080p Ultra (156.6 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (139.5 FPS) is much smaller at about 11%.
Q: Is the RTX 5090 overkill for Thief at 1080p?
A: Yes, based on the numbers. At 1920x1080, even the most demanding Ultra preset produces 156.6 FPS average, while Low settings reach 196.2 FPS. The GPU is clearly capable of far more than the game demands at this resolution, making it a highly future-proof choice for a 1080p display.
Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested hardware pairings?
A: This specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 158th out of 3720 tested combos for Thief, placing it in the top 4.3% of all configurations tested for this game.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the Intel Core i7-12700KF is bracketed by several nearly identical performers in average benchmark scores. The Intel Core i7-13700T averages 35403, which is just 0.1% lower. The Intel Core 5 213PE averages 35428, 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, 0.2% lower, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, 0.2% higher. Any of these processors would deliver effectively indistinguishable performance in Thief, as the game's workload is unlikely to expose such minute differences.
On the GPU side, the RTX 5090's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79605, 0.3% lower) and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79396, 0.6% lower). The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940, which is 1.1% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X is the only nearby rival that scores higher at 80959, a 1.4% advantage. These are the only comparable alternatives according to the data, and the differences are small enough that in-game performance would be nearly identical.
Because Thief's measured frame rates show the RTX 5090 delivering well over 60 FPS at every preset and resolution, a user with one of these similar GPUs would likely see comparable playability, though exact frame rates would depend on the specific GPU's real-world scaling beyond synthetic benchmarks.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals that the GPU is the dominant factor in this configuration, particularly at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the frame rate varies from 144.8 FPS on Low to 82.6 FPS on Ultra, a swing of 62.2 FPS driven primarily by GPU load. The CPU's role is more visible at lower resolutions where the GPU has less work to do. At 1920x1080, the spread is 196.2 FPS on Low to 156.6 FPS on Ultra, a 39.6 FPS difference, indicating that both components are handling the workload comfortably.
The scaling between resolutions reinforces this interpretation. Moving from 1440p Ultra (139.5 FPS) to 4K Ultra (82.6 FPS) costs 56.9 FPS, which is a classic GPU-bound scenario. In contrast, moving from 1080p Ultra (156.6 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (139.5 FPS) only costs 17.1 FPS. The smaller penalty at lower resolutions suggests the CPU is keeping pace adequately, allowing the GPU to scale its output. At 1080p, the average frame rates are high enough that neither component appears to be a bottleneck, but the GPU is clearly the limiting factor as resolution increases.
For a stealth game like Thief, which relies on precise timing and environmental awareness, the consistent 60+ FPS at all settings means the CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads are more than sufficient. The RTX 5090's 32 GB of memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for the game's textures and geometry, though the data does not isolate memory utilization directly.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 ranks 158th out of 3720 tested combos for Thief, which puts it in the top 4.3% of all configurations tested. This is a strong showing that reflects the high-end nature of both components. The rank is driven largely by the GPU's 92nd percentile standing, as the CPU's 85th percentile is solid but not at the very top.
In practical terms, this ranking means the combo outperforms the vast majority of tested systems for this game. The primary reason it is not higher is likely the CPU, which, while powerful, is not the absolute fastest available. However, the measured frame rates show that this pairing still achieves 82.6 FPS at 4K Ultra, so the rank does not indicate any playability concern. The combo RankInGame is measured against all tested pairings, and the data confirms that this specific configuration is in the upper echelon for Thief.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Thief with excellent performance at all tested resolutions and presets. The verdictByResolution data confirms that all four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at every resolution from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, with every average frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average of 156.6 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best, delivering 139.5 FPS. At 3840x2160, Ultra remains playable at 82.6 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The lowest frame rate recorded across all combinations is the 4K Ultra result of 82.6 FPS, meaning there is no scenario in the data where this combo drops below 60 FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 82.6 FPS. This is the maximum quality option available and still provides a comfortable margin above the playable threshold.
For 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, achieving 139.5 FPS. This is a very high frame rate that would benefit a high-refresh-rate monitor, and the 60 FPS threshold is surpassed with significant headroom.
For 1920x1080, Ultra is again the optimal choice, delivering 156.6 FPS. This is the highest frame rate at the highest quality preset, and it exceeds the 60 FPS target by a wide margin. The data shows no need to compromise on settings at any resolution, as even the most demanding preset remains playable.