Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Thief
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 80 | 81 | 108 | 130 |
| 1440p QHD | 125 | 128 | 142 | 161 |
| 1080p Full HD | 142 | 147 | 162 | 182 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Thief on Your System
The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers a decisive performance victory in Thief, clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold at every resolution and preset combination measured. Benchmark data confirms this combination ranks 381st out of 3720 tested combos in the game, placing it in the top tier of systems. At 4K Ultra, the system still produces 79.5 FPS average, while at 1080p Low it reaches 181.9 FPS, indicating the hardware has substantial headroom for this 2014 stealth title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the system shows a clear performance hierarchy across presets. The Low preset delivers the highest average at 130.3 FPS, followed by Medium at 108.4 FPS. The High preset achieves 80.9 FPS, while Ultra drops slightly to 79.5 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 50.8 FPS, representing a 39% performance cost for maximum visual fidelity. Notably, the difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is minimal at just 1.4 FPS, suggesting the Ultra preset’s additional effects have diminishing returns at 4K.
Moving to 2560x1440, all presets see substantial gains over their 4K counterparts. Low reaches 161 FPS, Medium hits 142.1 FPS, High achieves 127.8 FPS, and Ultra delivers 124.9 FPS. The scaling from 4K to 1440p ranges from 23.6% improvement (Low) to 57.1% improvement (Ultra). This indicates that the RTX 5080’s rendering load decreases significantly when pixel count drops, with the most demanding preset benefiting the most from the reduced resolution.
At 1920x1080, the system approaches its ceiling for this game. Low preset produces 181.9 FPS, Medium reaches 162.1 FPS, High delivers 147.1 FPS, and Ultra achieves 142.3 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 39.6 FPS, which is narrower than at higher resolutions. The 1080p results show only modest gains over 1440p—for instance, Ultra improves from 124.9 to 142.3 FPS, a 13.9% increase—suggesting that at lower resolutions, the CPU begins to play a more significant role in limiting frame rates.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals that the RTX 5080 GPU dominates performance scaling across resolutions, while the i5-13400F becomes increasingly relevant as resolution drops. At 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck: reducing settings from Ultra to Low yields a 50.8 FPS improvement (79.5 to 130.3 FPS), demonstrating that the graphics card’s workload dictates performance. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution without becoming a limiting factor.
As resolution decreases to 1440p, the GPU still leads performance, but the CPU’s influence grows. The Ultra preset improves by 45.4 FPS from 4K, while Low improves by only 30.7 FPS. This asymmetry indicates that at lower resolutions, the CPU’s ability to process game logic and draw calls becomes more significant relative to the GPU’s rendering workload. The i5-13400F’s single-thread score of 3191 in Cinebench R23 and 960 in 3DMark single-thread suggests adequate per-core performance for this title.
At 1080p, the CPU’s role is most pronounced. The performance gap between Low (181.9 FPS) and Ultra (142.3 FPS) narrows to 39.6 FPS, compared to 50.8 FPS at 4K. This compression indicates that the CPU is approaching its limit in feeding the GPU at high frame rates. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 and max-thread score of 7307 show strong multi-threading, but the game’s single-threaded aspects may cap performance near 182 FPS. The PassMark single-thread score of 3634 reinforces that this CPU has reasonable per-core strength, though it is not the primary driver of performance at any tested resolution.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores are the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (avgScore 25284, deltaPct 0), Intel Core 5 120 (avgScore 25362, deltaPct -0.3), AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (avgScore 25365, deltaPct -0.3), and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (avgScore 25201, deltaPct 0.4). These processors deliver within 0.4% of the i5-13400F’s average benchmark score of 25292, meaning users with any of these CPUs would expect nearly identical frame rates in Thief when paired with the same GPU. The Ryzen 5 5600X3D’s delta of -0.3% is particularly notable, as it suggests the V-cache advantage does not translate to meaningful gains in this game’s workload.
On the GPU side, the RTX 5080’s nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8060S (avgScore 55757, deltaPct 0.6), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (avgScore 55698, deltaPct 0.7), AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (avgScore 54828, deltaPct 2.3), and AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (avgScore 57367, deltaPct -2.2). The Radeon 8060S and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB are within 0.7% of the RTX 5080’s average score of 56083, indicating they would produce nearly identical FPS in Thief. The RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% faster on average, which could translate to roughly 1-3 additional FPS at 4K Ultra. The Pro W5700X trails by 2.3%, potentially yielding 1-2 FPS fewer in the most demanding scenarios.
The Verdict
This system can run Thief at playable frame rates across all tested configurations. The verdict by resolution confirms that every preset at every resolution clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the best playable settings are Ultra with 79.5 FPS average, which exceeds the threshold by 19.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra delivers 124.9 FPS, more than double the playable threshold. At 1920x1080, Ultra achieves 142.3 FPS, providing a 82.3 FPS margin above the minimum requirement.
The data indicates that even the most demanding configuration—4K Ultra—maintains a comfortable cushion above 60 FPS, with the average landing at 79.5 FPS. This means users can enable maximum visual quality without worrying about frame rate drops below playability. The lowest recorded average across all tests is 79.5 FPS, which still leaves substantial headroom. Given that the game launched in 2014, the RTX 5080’s modern architecture and 16 GB of GDDR7 memory are overkill for this title, but the combination ensures flawless performance at any resolution and preset.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which runs at 79.5 FPS average. This is the optimal choice for 4K users who want maximum visual fidelity while keeping a healthy margin above the playable threshold. The High preset at 80.9 FPS offers nearly identical performance with slightly reduced effects, but Ultra’s 79.5 FPS is close enough that the visual upgrade is worthwhile.
For 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best setting, delivering 124.9 FPS average. This provides an exceptional experience with high refresh rate monitors, as the frame rate approaches the 144 Hz range. The gap between Ultra and High at this resolution is only 2.9 FPS (124.9 vs 127.8), so there is no practical reason to drop below Ultra.
At 1920x1080, Ultra delivers 142.3 FPS, making it the clear choice for competitive or high-refresh-rate play. The system easily exceeds 140 FPS at maximum settings, and even the most demanding preset leaves room for other background tasks without impacting performance. The 39.6 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p suggests that users should always select Ultra, as the visual improvements come at a relatively small performance cost.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Thief at 4K Ultra settings?*
A: Yes, the system achieves 79.5 FPS average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is 19.5 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest performance preset at 2560x1440?
A: The Ultra preset delivers 124.9 FPS at 2560x1440, which is the best playable settings according to the verdict data.
Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 4K for this game?
A: At Ultra settings, 1920x1080 delivers 142.3 FPS versus 79.5 FPS at 3840x2160, representing a 62.8 FPS improvement or roughly 79% higher frame rate.
Q: Which component limits performance more at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, the performance gap between Low (181.9 FPS) and Ultra (142.3 FPS) narrows to 39.6 FPS compared to 50.8 FPS at 4K, indicating the CPU’s per-thread performance becomes more relevant at lower resolutions.
Q: Is the RTX 5080’s performance similar to any AMD graphics cards?
A: The AMD Radeon 8060S is within 0.6% and the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is within 0.7% of the RTX 5080’s average benchmark score, suggesting nearly identical performance in this game.
Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS on the lowest quality preset at 4K?
A: Yes, the Low preset at 3840x2160 delivers 130.3 FPS average, which is more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold.