Thief

The Intel Core i5-12400 and Intel Arc B570 combination presents a specific performance profile for Thief, a 2014 stealth title. The data shows a system that is highly capable at standard resolutions but reaches its limits at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares the components to nearby alternatives, and provides clear guidance on settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark data places both components in specific performance tiers relative to other hardware. For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12400 achieves an average benchmark score of 18683, which places it in the 72nd percentile of all tested CPUs. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are extremely close in performance. The AMD EPYC 7643 scores 18697, a negligible -0.1% difference. The Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18730, which is -0.3% relative to the i5-12400. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 18811, a -0.7% gap. The Intel Core i3-14100F scores 18519, putting it 0.9% behind. In practical terms for Thief, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame pacing and physics performance, meaning the choice between them would not meaningfully alter the gaming experience.

The GPU component, the Intel Arc B570, has an average benchmark score of 20556 and sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a similar tight grouping. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, just 0.1% behind the Arc B570. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a 0.1% advantage over the B570. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, which is 0.4% behind. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, putting it 0.5% ahead. For Thief, the Arc B570 is essentially performance-equivalent to these alternatives. Gamers with any of these GPUs would expect near-identical average frame rates at the same settings and resolution, with any differences falling well within run-to-run variance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the workload shifts between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system produces an average of 133 FPS on Low settings, which suggests the GPU is not fully saturated and the CPU is capable of feeding frames at a high rate. Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset average drops to 91 FPS, a decrease of approximately 31.6% from 1080p. At 3840x2160, the Low preset yields 54 FPS, a further drop of roughly 40.7% from 1440p. This scaling pattern indicates that as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, with the CPU's role diminishing.

The gap between presets at each resolution further clarifies the component roles. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low (133 FPS) and Ultra (73 FPS) is 60 FPS, showing that the GPU has substantial headroom to render more complex effects. At 2560x1440, the spread between Low (91 FPS) and Ultra (50 FPS) is 41 FPS. At 3840x2160, the difference shrinks to 25 FPS between Low (54 FPS) and Ultra (29 FPS). This compression of the preset range at higher resolutions confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor; the extra shading and texture work demanded by High and Ultra presets becomes more expensive relative to the GPU's fixed throughput. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, appears sufficient to maintain the minimum frame rates observed, as the data shows no anomaly where higher resolutions produce disproportionately low minimums relative to averages.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Thief at 1920x1080 with maximum settings?

A: Yes. The data shows the Ultra preset at 1920x1080 produces an average of 73 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. The system also handles High (77 FPS), Medium (101 FPS), and Low (133 FPS) at this resolution.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: The Medium preset is the best playable option, with an average of 69 FPS. The High preset dips to 53 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold, and Ultra is even lower at 50 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, none of the tested presets achieve 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 54 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS.

Q: How does the frame rate scale from Low to Ultra at 1080p?

A: The scaling is significant but not linear. Low averages 133 FPS, Medium averages 101 FPS (a 24.1% drop), High averages 77 FPS (a 42.1% drop from Low), and Ultra averages 73 FPS (a 45.1% drop from Low). The largest single-step drop is from Medium to High.

Q: Are there any settings where the minimum FPS drops below 60 at 1440p?

A: Yes, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 has a minimum of 59 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold, despite the average being 69 FPS. The average is playable, but brief dips may occur.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Thief?

A: The combination ranks 2994 out of 3720 tested configurations. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, indicating that while it can run the game well at 1080p and 1440p, many other systems deliver higher frame rates.

The Verdict

The benchmark results indicate that this PC can run Thief, but the experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset, with an average of 73 FPS, provides the best visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable but with fewer options. Only the Low (91 FPS) and Medium (69 FPS) presets achieve playable averages. The High preset at 53 FPS and Ultra at 50 FPS fall short of the 60 FPS target. At 3840x2160, the verdict is clear: the system cannot maintain playable frame rates on any preset. The best result is Low at 54 FPS, which is below the threshold, and the higher presets degrade further to 41 FPS, 31 FPS, and 29 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

For users prioritizing a consistent 60 FPS experience, the data provides a clear recommendation for each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that remains at or above 60 FPS, delivering an average of 73 FPS. This is the optimal choice for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing playability. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the best playable option, averaging 69 FPS. It is important to note that the minimum FPS for this preset is 59, so there may be occasional dips below 60, but the average remains comfortable. At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. Users who insist on 4K would need to accept lower frame rates or reduce the resolution, as the data shows no settings combination that meets the 60 FPS standard.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations for Thief, the Intel Core i5-12400 and Intel Arc B570 pairing achieves a rank of 2994 out of 3720. This places the system in the 80.5th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning roughly 19.5% of tested systems perform worse, while the majority perform better. This rank reflects the GPU's positioning in the 65th percentile of all GPUs and the CPU's 72nd percentile standing. The rank suggests that while this combo is not a top-tier performer, it is far from the bottom of the list. The measured FPS data supports this interpretation: the system handles 1080p with ease, manages 1440p with settings compromises, and fails at 4K. The rank of 2994 is consistent with a mid-range pairing that prioritizes 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table presents the exact measured performance data for all tested resolution and settings combinations.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 31 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 54 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41 | 35 | 47 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | High | 53 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 91 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 69 | 59 | 79 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | High | 77 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 133 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 101 | 86 | 116 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 73 | — | — |

The data shows that the only configurations with recorded minimum and maximum frame rates are the Medium presets at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset has a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 116 FPS, indicating a stable frame time distribution. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset's minimum drops to 59 FPS, which is just below the playable threshold, while the maximum reaches 79 FPS. This suggests more frame time variance at the higher resolution. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset ranges from 35 to 47 FPS, showing that the GPU is heavily loaded and frame times are less consistent. The absence of min/max data for other presets means only the average FPS is available for those configurations, but the overall pattern is clear: the system scales predictably with resolution and settings, with the GPU as the primary constraint at higher resolutions.