Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Thief
Stealth 2014

Thief

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
73 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
91 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
50 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
13ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,499
Your CPU 75,779
Graphics Card
Required 27,801
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 31 41 54
1440p QHD 50 53 69 91
1080p Full HD 73 77 101 133

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 77
1920x1080 Low 133
1920x1080 Medium 101
1920x1080 Ultra 73
2560x1440 High 53
2560x1440 Low 91
2560x1440 Medium 69
2560x1440 Ultra 50
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Thief on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers playable performance in Thief at 1080p and 1440p, but falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K across all tested settings. At 1920x1080, the combo reaches 73 FPS on Ultra settings, while at 2560x1440 the best playable preset is Medium at 69 FPS. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only produce 54 FPS, leaving 4K unplayable by the 60 FPS standard. The pairing ranks 2994 out of 3720 tested combinations in this game, placing it in the lower third of all tested hardware pairs, with the GPU acting as the primary constraint at higher resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

1920x1080 (1080p): Ultra settings are fully playable, with an average of 73 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS, and it represents the maximum visual quality available at this resolution. The gap between Ultra and the next lower preset is modest: High runs at 77 FPS, Medium at 101 FPS, and Low at 133 FPS. Since Ultra stays above the 60 FPS playability threshold with a 13 FPS margin, there is no reason to drop below it for performance reasons.

2560x1440 (1440p): Medium settings are the best playable option, producing an average of 69 FPS. Low settings run at 91 FPS, which is faster but requires sacrificing visual fidelity. High settings drop to 53 FPS, below the playable threshold, and Ultra falls to 50 FPS. The data shows that Medium is the sweet spot at this resolution: it clears the 60 FPS bar by 9 FPS while offering substantially better visuals than Low. Players seeking higher quality will need to accept sub-60 FPS performance, as neither High nor Ultra reaches the playability threshold.

3840x2160 (4K): No settings achieve 60 FPS. The best result is Low at 54 FPS, followed by Medium at 41 FPS, High at 31 FPS, and Ultra at 29 FPS. The verdict data confirms that no playable settings exist at this resolution. Even the lowest quality preset falls 6 FPS short of the target, and the gap widens dramatically as quality increases. This resolution is effectively off-limits for this combo in Thief without external scaling technologies or resolution reduction.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and the Arc B570 becomes clear when examining frame rate scaling across resolutions and presets. At 1080p, the CPU has ample headroom: the 16-core, 32-thread processor with a 5.70 GHz boost clock drives frame rates from 73 FPS at Ultra to 133 FPS at Low, with the GPU clearly being the bottleneck since even the highest preset remains far from CPU limits. The CPU's percentile rank of 95 among all tested CPUs, combined with an average benchmark score of 75779, indicates it is far more capable than what Thief demands at this resolution.

Moving to 1440p, the GPU's workload increases, and the frame rate deltas between presets compress slightly. Low runs at 91 FPS, Medium at 69 FPS, High at 53 FPS, and Ultra at 50 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings (133 to 91 FPS, a 31.6% drop) shows the GPU becoming more influential, but the CPU still provides enough throughput to keep Low above 90 FPS. At Medium, the drop from 101 to 69 FPS (31.7%) mirrors the Low scaling, suggesting consistent GPU-bound behavior.

At 4K, the GPU dominates entirely. Low produces 54 FPS, Medium 41 FPS, High 31 FPS, and Ultra 29 FPS. The scaling from 1440p Low to 4K Low (91 to 54 FPS, a 40.7% drop) demonstrates severe GPU limitation. The CPU's role at this resolution is minimal — even the most powerful desktop processors cannot compensate for the Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth being overwhelmed by 4K rendering. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556, places it in the mid-range, which aligns with the observed 4K shortfall.

The pattern is clear: at 1080p, the GPU is the limiting factor but the CPU has enormous reserve capacity; at 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, though the CPU still keeps Low presets fluid; at 4K, the GPU single-handedly determines playability, and the CPU's performance is irrelevant to the outcome.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080: The full preset sweep shows a wide performance envelope. Low settings deliver 133 FPS average. Medium steps up to 101 FPS average, with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 116 FPS. High settings produce 77 FPS average. Ultra settings yield 73 FPS average. The minimum and maximum data points for Medium (86 to 116 FPS) indicate a 30 FPS spread, suggesting some scene-to-scene variance but no dips below the 60 FPS threshold. The progression from Low to Ultra (133 to 73 FPS) represents a 45.1% performance cost for maximum visual quality, which is a reasonable trade-off given that Ultra remains playable.

2560x1440: Low settings run at 91 FPS. Medium settings average 69 FPS, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS. High settings drop to 53 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 50 FPS. The Medium preset's 59 FPS minimum is notable — it dips just below the 60 FPS playability threshold in the worst-case scenes, even though the average is 69 FPS. This means players may experience brief stutters below the target during demanding moments. High and Ultra are both unplayable by the average FPS standard, with gaps of 7 and 10 FPS respectively below the threshold.

3840x2160: Low settings produce 54 FPS. Medium settings average 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 47 FPS. High settings run at 31 FPS. Ultra settings deliver 29 FPS. The Medium preset's range (35 to 47 FPS) shows severe inconsistency, with a 12 FPS spread that includes sub-40 FPS dips. None of these results approach the 60 FPS target — the best case (Low at 54 FPS) still falls short by 6 FPS, and the worst case (Ultra at 29 FPS) is less than half the target frame rate.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2994 out of 3720 tested combos in Thief, placing it in the 80.5th percentile of the ranking distribution (meaning it performs worse than roughly 80% of tested combinations). This is a low ranking for a system containing a top-tier CPU, and it directly reflects the GPU's mid-range position. The CPU alone sits in the 95th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 75779, while the GPU sits in the 65th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 20556.

The rank disparity between the CPU's strength and the combo's overall position indicates that Thief's performance is overwhelmingly GPU-bound for this pairing. A combination with a weaker CPU but a stronger GPU would likely rank higher in this specific game. The 3720-combo pool includes many systems with more balanced or GPU-favoring configurations, which explains why this pairing lands in the bottom fifth despite its premium CPU.

At 1080p, the combo's performance is respectable — Ultra at 73 FPS is a solid result. But the ranking weights all tested resolutions, and the 4K failure (no playable settings) drags the overall position down significantly. The data suggests that for this game, the Arc B570 is the limiting factor, and the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's substantial compute resources (16 cores, 32 threads, 128 MB L3 cache) are largely underutilized.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rivals in the benchmark database, several hardware alternatives would produce nearly identical performance in Thief with this CPU-GPU pairing.

On the CPU side: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 has an average benchmark score of 75738, just 0.1% below the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's 75779. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D scores 75716, also 0.1% lower. The AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75582, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488, 0.4% lower. All four processors are within 0.4% of the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's average score, meaning any of them would produce essentially identical frame rates in Thief when paired with the Arc B570. Given that the GPU is the bottleneck at all resolutions above 1080p, swapping the CPU to any of these rivals would change performance by less than 1%.

On the GPU side: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile has an average score of 20534, 0.1% lower than the Arc B570's 20556. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.4% lower. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, 0.5% higher. These four GPUs are all within 0.5% of the Arc B570's average benchmark score. In practical terms, swapping the Arc B570 for any of these would yield frame rate differences of less than 1% in Thief. The RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750 are the closest matches, with the A750 being the most direct peer given its identical architecture family (Intel Arc).

The practical takeaway: if a user already owns any of these CPUs or GPUs, upgrading to the Ryzen 9 9950X3D or Arc B570 respectively would not meaningfully change Thief performance. The entire cluster of CPU and GPU rivals behaves within a 1% performance band.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Thief at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 73 FPS, which is 13 FPS above the 60 FPS playability threshold. Ultra is the best playable preset at this resolution.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 69 FPS, which is the highest quality preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. However, the minimum FPS for Medium is 59, so brief dips below the threshold can occur.

Q: Is 4K playable with this hardware?

A: No. The verdict data lists no playable settings at 3840x2160. Even Low settings only reach 54 FPS average, which is 6 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings drop to 29 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems in Thief?

A: The combination ranks 2994 out of 3720 tested combos. The CPU is in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, but the GPU's 65th percentile ranking limits overall performance, placing the combo in the bottom fifth of tested systems.

Q: Which component limits performance most in this game?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck at all resolutions. Frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K shows severe drops (e.g., Low settings fall from 133 FPS at 1080p to 54 FPS at 4K), while the CPU has substantial headroom with a 95th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 75779.

Q: What GPU alternatives would perform similarly in Thief?

A: The Intel Arc A750 (0.1% higher average score), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% lower), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (0.4% lower), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (0.5% higher) all fall within 0.5% of the Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556. Any of these would produce nearly identical frame rates in Thief.