Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Thief
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 31 | 41 | 54 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 53 | 69 | 91 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 77 | 101 | 133 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Thief on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a playable experience in Thief at 1080p and 1440p, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K across all tested settings. The data indicates that this pairing is best suited for 1440p Medium or 1080p Ultra, where it maintains comfortable frame rates, while 4K gaming remains out of reach for smooth performance.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination shows strong performance across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 133 FPS, which is the highest recorded for this pairing. Medium settings deliver an average of 101 FPS, with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 116 FPS. High settings produce 77 FPS on average, while the Ultra preset, the most demanding option, still manages a solid 73 FPS average. These results indicate that the CPU-GPU combo has ample headroom at this resolution, with even the heaviest settings staying well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down noticeably. The Low preset delivers 91 FPS on average, still a comfortable margin above the threshold. Medium settings produce 69 FPS average, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS, meaning the frame rate occasionally dips just below 60 FPS. High settings drop to 53 FPS average, and Ultra falls further to 50 FPS. This resolution marks the boundary where the most demanding presets begin to struggle, but Medium remains viable.
At 3840x2160, the combination is not playable by the 60 FPS standard. Low settings achieve 54 FPS average, which is the best result at this resolution but still below the threshold. Medium settings deliver 41 FPS average, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 47 FPS. High settings produce 31 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 29 FPS. These numbers clearly show that 4K gaming with this hardware requires significant compromises, and even the lowest settings cannot reach the playable threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a classic resolution-dependent shift in workload balance. At 1080p, the frame rates are high across all presets, with the Low preset reaching 133 FPS. This suggests that the Ryzen 9 7900X, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, provides sufficient processing power to keep the Intel Arc B570 fed with data. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a drop from 133 FPS to 73 FPS, a reduction of roughly 45%, which points to the GPU becoming more involved as graphical complexity increases.
At 1440p, the performance gap between presets widens in absolute terms but narrows in percentage. Low delivers 91 FPS, Medium 69 FPS, High 53 FPS, and Ultra 50 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is about 45%, similar to 1080p, but the absolute values are lower. This indicates that the GPU is now the primary limiting factor, as the CPU's high thread count and fast boost clock of 5.60 GHz are less relevant when pixel count increases.
At 4K, the pattern becomes stark. Low settings produce 54 FPS, while Ultra drops to 29 FPS, a reduction of nearly 46%. The fact that even Low settings cannot exceed 60 FPS suggests that the Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the pixel throughput demanded at this resolution. The GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is simply not enough to maintain playable rates, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 73 FPS. This is the best possible visual quality available for this resolution while maintaining smooth gameplay. The data shows that High (77 FPS) and Medium (101 FPS) also qualify, but Ultra offers the highest fidelity without crossing the playability line.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are Medium, which achieves an average of 69 FPS. This is the only preset above the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution, as High (53 FPS) and Ultra (50 FPS) both fall below. Low also qualifies at 91 FPS, but Medium provides a better visual experience while still meeting the playability standard. The minimum of 59 FPS at Medium is a near-miss for the threshold, but the average remains comfortably above it.
At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. The best result is Low at 54 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. Medium (41 FPS), High (31 FPS), and Ultra (29 FPS) are all well below playable levels. The verdict data confirms that no settings at this resolution achieve playable performance, so users should avoid 4K with this configuration for Thief.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its overall processing power. The AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53,206, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 9 7900X's average benchmark score of 53,288. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53,469, sitting 0.3% higher. The Intel Xeon 634 scores 52,974, a 0.6% deficit, while the Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53,620, a 0.6% advantage. These deltas are all under one percent, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Thief when paired with the same GPU.
For the GPU, the Intel Arc B570's nearest rivals show similar performance parity. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534, which is 0.1% higher than the Arc B570's 20,556 average. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20,582, a 0.1% difference. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480, a 0.4% deficit, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662, a 0.5% advantage. These small deltas mean that swapping the Arc B570 for any of these GPUs would result in nearly identical FPS figures across all resolutions and settings.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Thief at 4K with 60 FPS?
A: No. The best 4K result is 54 FPS at Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall further behind, with 41, 31, and 29 FPS respectively.
Q: What is the best 1440p setting for this combination?
A: Medium is the best playable option at 1440p, delivering an average of 69 FPS. Low achieves 91 FPS but offers lower visual quality, while High and Ultra drop to 53 and 50 FPS, respectively.
Q: Is the Ryzen 9 7900X or the Intel Arc B570 the bottleneck at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, the GPU is the limiting factor. Frames drop from 133 FPS at Low to 73 FPS at Ultra, a 45% reduction, which indicates graphical settings have a significant impact. The CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores suggest it is not the constraint at this resolution.
Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its closest GPU rival in this game?
A: The Arc B570's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, has an average score 0.1% higher. The Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% lower. These differences are negligible, so frame rates in Thief would be virtually identical across these GPUs.
Q: What CPU would perform similarly to the Ryzen 9 7900X in this setup?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700F is the closest rival, with a score 0.6% higher than the Ryzen 9 7900X. The AMD EPYC 7313P is 0.2% lower, and the Intel Xeon 634 is 0.6% lower. Any of these would produce nearly the same FPS.
Q: Why is 4K performance so much worse than 1080p?
A: The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is severe. At Low settings, 1080p achieves 133 FPS, while 4K Low produces 54 FPS, a 59% decrease. This indicates the GPU's memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s and compute throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS are insufficient for the higher pixel workload.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2,994 out of 3,720 tested configurations for Thief. This places it in the bottom 20% of all tested combos, which is surprising given the individual component scores. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile among all processors, and the GPU is in the 65th percentile among all graphics cards. The low overall rank suggests that the pairing's performance in this specific game is limited by the GPU's 4K inadequacy and the fact that the CPU's considerable power is underutilized at higher resolutions. The 1440p Medium result of 69 FPS and 1080p Ultra result of 73 FPS are respectable, but the inability to handle 4K at all drags the ranking down. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p, this combination performs adequately, but the rank reflects that many other configurations offer better overall flexibility across resolutions.