Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Thief
Stealth 2014

Thief

73%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
73 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
91 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
50 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
13ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,499
Your CPU 29,879
Graphics Card
Required 27,801
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 31 41 54
1440p QHD 50 53 69 91
1080p Full HD 73 77 101 133

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 77
1920x1080 Low 133
1920x1080 Medium 101
1920x1080 Ultra 73
2560x1440 High 53
2560x1440 Low 91
2560x1440 Medium 69
2560x1440 Ultra 50
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Thief on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and Intel Arc B570 pairing delivers a wide spread of performance in Thief, ranging from a barely interactive 29 FPS at 4K Ultra to a smooth 133 FPS at 1080p Low. The data reveals a system that is decisively resolution-bound: it clears the 60 FPS playability threshold at 1080p across every preset and at 1440p up to Medium, but it falters completely at 3840x2160, where no setting reaches a playable average. This benchmark set, drawn from measured FPS data, shows a classic mid-range combo that excels at mainstream resolutions but runs out of headroom when pixel count escalates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo is consistently fluid. The Low preset produces an average of 133 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this pairing in any configuration. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 101 FPS, with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 116 FPS, indicating stable frame pacing even during demanding scenes. The High preset yields 77 FPS on average, while the Ultra preset, the most demanding at this resolution, still maintains a respectable 73 FPS. All four 1080p presets comfortably exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold, with the gap between Low and Ultra representing a 60 FPS swing — from 133 down to 73 — which suggests the GPU is the primary scaling factor here, not the CPU.

At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably but remains playable for two of the four presets. The Low preset averages 91 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS line. Medium follows at 69 FPS average, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS; the minimum barely misses the 60 FPS threshold, indicating occasional dips below the playable line even though the average clears it. High drops to 53 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 50 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 42 FPS on Low (133 to 91) and 24 FPS on Ultra (73 to 50), showing that the penalty is proportionally larger at lower presets where the GPU is already working closer to its limits.

At 3840x2160, the picture is bleak. The Low preset averages 54 FPS, just under the 60 FPS target. Medium averages 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 47 FPS, revealing significant frame variance. High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS. No 4K preset reaches the playable threshold; the best case is Low at 54 FPS, which is still 6 FPS short. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe: Low drops from 91 to 54 FPS (a 37 FPS loss), and Medium drops from 69 to 41 FPS (a 28 FPS loss). The data indicates that this combo is not viable for 4K gaming in Thief, regardless of settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results show that the Intel Arc B570 is the dominant constraint across all resolutions, but the CPU’s role becomes more apparent at lower settings. At 1080p Low, the 133 FPS average suggests the GPU is still managing to feed frames quickly, but the CPU’s capability is not the bottleneck — the Arc B570’s 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for this load. However, as resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s become limiting factors. The scaling from 1080p Ultra (73 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (50 FPS) is a 31.5% drop, which aligns with the increased pixel count of 2.25x; the fact that FPS does not drop proportionally suggests some CPU overhead is being relieved at higher resolutions, but the GPU is still the primary limiter.

The Ryzen 7 5800XT, with 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 3 architecture, shows its strength in single-threaded and lightly-threaded scenarios. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 959 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3359 indicate strong per-core performance, which Thief likely leverages for game logic and AI. At 4K Low, the average of 54 FPS versus 1080p Low’s 133 FPS — a 79 FPS gap — indicates that the GPU is doing most of the work, and the CPU is not the bottleneck even at the lowest preset. Conversely, at 1080p Ultra, the 73 FPS average shows that even with maximum settings, the CPU can feed the GPU adequately; the bottleneck is clearly the Arc B570’s rasterization throughput. The data implies that upgrading the GPU would yield immediate gains at 1440p and 4K, while the CPU would remain relevant for another generation.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this pairing holds a combo rank of 2994 out of 3720 total combos. This places it in the 80th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 80% of the other CPU-GPU pairings in the database perform better in Thief. The rank reflects the GPU’s mid-range positioning: the Intel Arc B570 sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 7 5800XT sits at the 81st percentile among all CPUs. The combination of a high-percentile CPU with a lower-percentile GPU skews the overall rank downward, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor in most scenarios. The data suggests that this combo is better suited for CPU-intensive tasks than for high-refresh-rate gaming at high resolutions.

The rank of 2994 out of 3720 is not a failure, but it indicates that many cheaper or older GPU pairings would deliver comparable or better FPS in Thief. For instance, the GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.1) and the Intel Arc A750 (deltaPct -0.1), both of which score nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks. If those GPUs were paired with the same CPU, the Thief results would likely be within a few FPS, given the GPU’s dominant role. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (deltaPct 0) and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (deltaPct 0.6), would not change the gaming outcome meaningfully because the GPU is the bottleneck. This rank reflects a system that is well-balanced for productivity but underwhelming for high-end gaming.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores are the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (avgScore 29868, deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (avgScore 29955, deltaPct -0.3), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (avgScore 29955, deltaPct -0.3). Each of these CPUs scores within 0.3% of the Ryzen 7 5800XT’s average of 29879, meaning they would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Thief when paired with the same GPU. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (avgScore 29713, deltaPct 0.6) is also within 1% of the 5800XT, so swapping to any of these would not shift the measured FPS by more than 1-2 frames. The data indicates that the CPU choice is effectively irrelevant for this game at these settings, as the GPU dominates.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (avgScore 20534, deltaPct 0.1), the Intel Arc A750 (avgScore 20582, deltaPct -0.1), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (avgScore 20480, deltaPct 0.4), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (avgScore 20662, deltaPct -0.5). All of these GPUs have synthetic scores within 0.5% of the Arc B570’s average of 20556. In Thief, this would translate to nearly identical FPS at every resolution and preset. For example, the Arc A750, which is the closest match, would produce the same 31 FPS at 4K High and the same 73 FPS at 1080p Ultra. The RTX 3070 Mobile, despite being a mobile part, would behave similarly, meaning users could expect no meaningful difference in playability. The Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M390X are older or professional parts, but their scores suggest they would also land within the same FPS range. This indicates that the Arc B570 is well-positioned against its direct competitors, offering no unique advantage or disadvantage in this specific game.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Thief at 1080p with maximum settings?*

A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset, the average FPS is 73, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. The minimum FPS is not recorded for this preset, but the average suggests consistent performance above the target.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: Medium is the highest preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 69 FPS. The minimum of 59 FPS is just below the threshold, but the average is comfortable. High and Ultra both fall short, averaging 53 FPS and 50 FPS respectively.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this combo?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset averages only 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. Higher presets drop further, with Medium at 41 FPS and Ultra at 29 FPS. No 4K setting is playable.

Q: How does this system rank compared to other tested combos?

A: It ranks 2994 out of 3720 total combos in the database for Thief. This places it in the lower 20% of tested systems, reflecting the GPU’s mid-range performance relative to the CPU’s higher-tier standing.

Q: What GPU would perform similarly to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.1) and the Intel Arc A750 (deltaPct -0.1) are the closest matches, with synthetic scores within 0.1% of the Arc B570. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (deltaPct 0.4) and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (deltaPct -0.5) are also within 0.5%, so all would produce nearly identical FPS in Thief.

Q: Does the CPU matter for this game at 1440p?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary constraint. At 1440p Medium, the average drops from 101 FPS at 1080p to 69 FPS, a 32 FPS loss, which aligns with GPU workload scaling. The Ryzen 7 5800XT’s nearest CPU rivals, such as the Ryzen 7 7840H (deltaPct 0), would not change FPS because the GPU is the bottleneck.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is clear: this system can run Thief at 1080p with all presets playable, and at 1440p with Low and Medium presets playable, but it cannot run the game at 4K under any settings. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 73 FPS, making it fully playable with maximum visual quality. At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, averaging 69 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold despite a minimum of 59 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves a 60 FPS average; the closest is Low at 54 FPS, which is still below the playable line. The data indicates that users should target 1080p for the best experience, with 1440p as a viable alternative if they are willing to accept Medium settings. 4K is out of reach for this pairing.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 73 FPS. This delivers the highest visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Medium, averaging 69 FPS; High and Ultra fall below 60 FPS, so Medium is the maximum. At 3840x2160, there is no playable setting — even Low averages 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. For users prioritizing frame rate over quality at 4K, the data shows that no preset will suffice, and they should instead drop to 1440p for a playable experience. The overall best visual experience for this combo is 1080p Ultra, which balances quality and performance at 73 FPS.