Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Thief
Stealth 2014

Thief

85%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
191 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
141 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
169 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
95 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
101 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
58 FPS
6.8ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,499
Your CPU 26,324
Graphics Card
Required 27,801
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 58 62 77 101
1440p QHD 95 100 130 169
1080p Full HD 141 146 175 191

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 146
1920x1080 Low 191
1920x1080 Medium 175
1920x1080 Ultra 141
2560x1440 High 100
2560x1440 Low 169
2560x1440 Medium 130
2560x1440 Ultra 95
3840x2160 High 62
3840x2160 Low 101
3840x2160 Medium 77
3840x2160 Ultra 58

Performance Analysis: Thief on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a strong performance profile for Thief, a 2014 stealth title. The benchmark data, measured across three resolutions and four settings presets, shows this system comfortably clears the 60 FPS playable threshold in most configurations. This analysis breaks down the measured frames per second, identifies the bottleneck dynamics, and contextualizes the results against rival hardware.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, which produces an average of 61.7 FPS. The Ultra preset dips to 57.5 FPS, just below the playable threshold. While Low and Medium also clear the threshold at 100.5 and 77.2 FPS respectively, High is the optimal choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.

For 2560x1440, the system handles the Ultra preset at an average of 94.7 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and it performs well above the 60 FPS floor. The data shows no reason to drop below Ultra at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset leaves a 34.7 FPS margin.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is again the best choice, achieving an average of 140.6 FPS. This is the highest performance tier in the dataset, and the frame rate is more than double the playable threshold. The system is not stressed at this resolution, with Low, Medium, and High all exceeding 145 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals the shifting balance between CPU and GPU workload. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with Ultra hitting 140.6 FPS and Low reaching 190.5 FPS. This suggests the CPU, an AMD Ryzen 5 7600 with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, is capable of feeding frames rapidly, but the GPU is not yet the primary limiter.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average frame rates drop noticeably. Ultra falls from 140.6 to 94.7 FPS, a reduction of 45.9 FPS. This scaling indicates the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, is becoming more significant as pixel count increases. The RTX 4070 features 5888 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, which are being utilized more heavily.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant component. Ultra drops to 57.5 FPS, and the gap between Low (100.5 FPS) and Ultra (57.5 FPS) widens to 43 FPS. This spread is much larger than at lower resolutions, showing that the GPU's rendering load scales steeply with resolution. The CPU's role is less pronounced here; its performance remains consistent, while the GPU's pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor. The data confirms a typical pattern: at 1080p the CPU is more relevant, at 1440p the balance shifts, and at 4K the GPU dictates the outcome.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080:

  • Low: Average 190.5 FPS.
  • Medium: Average 175.2 FPS.
  • High: Average 145.9 FPS.
  • Ultra: Average 140.6 FPS.

The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 49.9 FPS drop. The step from High to Ultra is small, a 5.3 FPS difference, while the gap from Medium to High is larger, a 29.3 FPS difference. This suggests the High preset offers a substantial visual improvement over Medium at a modest performance cost.

2560x1440:

  • Low: Average 169.4 FPS.
  • Medium: Average 130 FPS.
  • High: Average 99.6 FPS.
  • Ultra: Average 94.7 FPS.

At 1440p, the drop from Low to Ultra is 74.7 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra is 4.9 FPS, nearly identical to the 1080p margin. The cost of moving from Medium to High is 30.4 FPS, which is a significant hit.

3840x2160:

  • Low: Average 100.5 FPS.
  • Medium: Average 77.2 FPS.
  • High: Average 61.7 FPS.
  • Ultra: Average 57.5 FPS.

At 4K, the total range from Low to Ultra is 43 FPS. The High to Ultra step is only 4.2 FPS, but this is enough to cross the 60 FPS threshold downward. Medium to High costs 15.5 FPS, and Low to Medium costs 23.3 FPS. The scaling is less linear at this resolution, with the GPU nearing its limits.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC can run Thief effectively across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, every preset, from Low at 190.5 FPS to Ultra at 140.6 FPS, clears the 60 FPS threshold with substantial headroom. The system is over-performing for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is equally positive. All four presets are playable, with Ultra achieving 94.7 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this combination, offering high visual quality without compromising frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the system is borderline at the highest settings. High preset runs at 61.7 FPS, just above the 60 FPS line, while Ultra falls to 57.5 FPS. The verdict for 4K is that the game is playable at High, Low, and Medium settings, but Ultra is not recommended. The data indicates that for a locked 60 FPS experience at 4K, High is the maximum preset to use.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Thief at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 3840x2160, the High preset runs at an average of 61.7 FPS, which is playable. The Ultra preset drops to 57.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, achieving an average of 94.7 FPS. This is the highest quality setting and it still provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How much performance is lost when switching from 1080p to 4K?

A: At the Ultra preset, the average frame rate drops from 140.6 FPS at 1920x1080 to 57.5 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a decrease of 83.1 FPS, or roughly 59% of the 1080p performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Thief?

A: The data shows the GPU becomes the dominant factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, frame rates are high, indicating the CPU can keep up. At 4K, the GPU's workload increases significantly, and the frame rate drops, showing the RTX 4070 is the limiting component.

Q: Does the Ultra preset provide a big improvement over High?

A: The performance difference between High and Ultra is small. At 2560x1440, the difference is 4.9 FPS, and at 1920x1080, it is 5.3 FPS. At 3840x2160, the difference is 4.2 FPS, but this is enough to push Ultra below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the playable threshold for this game?

A: The playable threshold is defined as an average of 60 FPS. This is the baseline used to determine which settings presets are considered playable at each resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination ranks 736th out of 3720 tested combos for Thief. This places it in the top 20% of all tested systems. The percentile data supports this ranking: the CPU is in the 78th percentile against all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 81st percentile against all GPUs. This indicates a well-balanced pairing that performs above average for this game.

The rank of 736 suggests that while this is a capable system, there are many other combinations that deliver higher frame rates, particularly at lower resolutions where CPU performance can be a differentiator. However, the overall position is strong, reflecting the solid performance of both components in this specific title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU, several other hardware combinations would deliver similar performance in Thief. The CPU rivals are close in average benchmark score, with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX being 0.2% lower, the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS being 0.3% higher, the Intel Core i9-11900KF being 0.4% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U being 0.5% lower. These processors would behave similarly in CPU-bound scenarios.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla P4, which is 0.1% lower in average score, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 0.4% lower, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile at 1.3% higher, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 at 1.3% lower. These graphics cards would produce nearly identical frame rates in Thief, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU is the limiting factor.

A system with a Ryzen 9 6900HX or a Core i9-11900KF paired with a Tesla P4 or RX Vega 56 would offer a comparable experience. The RTX 4080 Mobile, while slightly faster, would still be in the same performance tier. These alternatives confirm that the Ryzen 5 7600 and RTX 4070 combination sits within a narrow performance band, and users with these nearby components can expect similar frame rates.