Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

82%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
118 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
51 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
81 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
35 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
48 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
21 FPS
14.9ms Frame Time
22ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 21 27 32 48
1440p QHD 35 46 54 81
1080p Full HD 51 67 79 118

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 67
1920x1080 Low 118
1920x1080 Medium 79
1920x1080 Ultra 51
2560x1440 High 46
2560x1440 Low 81
2560x1440 Medium 54
2560x1440 Ultra 35
3840x2160 High 27
3840x2160 Low 48
3840x2160 Medium 32
3840x2160 Ultra 21

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a mixed bag of results in Rust, a survival title that is notoriously demanding on both CPU and GPU resources. Measured data shows this combo is only capable of a consistently smooth 60+ FPS experience at 1080p, with a single playable preset at 1440p. At 4K, the combination falls well short of the playability threshold across all tested settings. This analysis breaks down the exact frame rates, the best settings for each resolution, and how the two components share the workload.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc B570 combination in Rust reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets. At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. On the Low preset, the average FPS is 48, which is still below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Moving to Medium yields an average of 32 FPS, with minimum and maximum readings of 27 and 37 FPS respectively. The High preset produces an average of 27 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops the average to 21 FPS. This data indicates a severe performance bottleneck at 4K, with even the lowest settings failing to reach the target frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves, but the system remains limited. The Low preset achieves an average of 81 FPS, crossing the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset records an average of 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS. High settings yield an average of 46 FPS, while Ultra drops to 35 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is substantial, a 27 FPS difference, suggesting that the jump in visual fidelity comes at a steep performance cost. Only the Low preset provides a comfortable margin above the playability threshold.

At 1920x1080, the combo finally shows its strengths. The Low preset delivers an impressive 118 FPS average. The Medium preset averages 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS, which keeps it safely above the 60 FPS line. High settings produce an average of 67 FPS, just barely clearing the threshold. The Ultra preset, however, falls to 51 FPS average, which is below the playable mark. This resolution is the only one where the system offers multiple viable settings for a smooth experience.

The scaling between resolutions shows a significant performance drop as pixel count increases. The 81 FPS average at 1440p Low drops to 48 FPS at 4K Low, a 41% reduction. Similarly, the 67 FPS average at 1080p High falls to 46 FPS at 1440p High, a 31% loss. The frame rate deltas between presets are consistent, with Ultra always being the most demanding and Low the least, but the overall headroom at higher resolutions is insufficient for a stable experience.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data indicates that this hardware combination can only achieve a smooth, playable experience at two resolutions, and only with specific presets.

At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The verdict data confirms this, listing no playable settings. The highest average FPS achieved is 48 on Low, which still falls 12 FPS short of the 60 FPS threshold. Users targeting 4K will need to lower their expectations or consider hardware upgrades, as the Intel Arc B570 is not sufficient for this resolution in Rust.

At 2560x1440, the best settings that stay at or above 60 FPS is the Low preset, which delivers an average of 81 FPS. This is the only preset at this resolution that clears the threshold. The Medium preset, at 54 FPS, is not viable for a smooth experience, despite having a maximum FPS of 62. The 46 FPS minimum on Medium indicates noticeable stutter, making Low the only reliable choice for 1440p gaming.

At 1920x1080, the best settings that stays at or above 60 FPS is the High preset, which achieves an average of 67 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable. While the Medium preset offers a higher average of 79 FPS, High provides a better visual experience while still clearing the 60 FPS bar. The Ultra preset, at 51 FPS, is not playable. For users who prioritize frame rate above all else, the Low preset at 118 FPS is an option, but High represents the optimal balance of visual quality and performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals how the workload shifts between the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and the Intel Arc B570 as resolution and settings change. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 5 architecture, is a strong performer, as indicated by its 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The GPU, on the other hand, sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, suggesting it is the weaker link in this pairing.

The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K demonstrates that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. For instance, at 1080p Low, the system achieves 118 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 81 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 48 FPS. This scaling pattern is typical of GPU-bound scenarios, where the render resolution increases the load on the graphics processor. The Arc B570's memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s and 10 GB of GDDR6 memory appear insufficient for the demands of 4K rendering in Rust.

The settings scaling also points to the GPU's dominance. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average FPS from 118 to 51. This 67 FPS drop is more pronounced than the drop seen when simply changing resolution, which indicates that the pixel shading and texture work load the GPU heavily. However, the CPU still plays a role, as Rust is known for its simulation and entity processing. The Ryzen 7 9700F's single-thread score of 4691 and multithread score of 36470 in Passmark tests suggest it has ample headroom to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, but at 4K, the GPU's limitations cap the frame rate regardless of CPU capability.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is more capable than the GPU, allowing the system to reach high frame rates. At 1440p, the balance tips, and the GPU starts to become the limiting factor. At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck, as the CPU's performance cannot compensate for the Arc B570's inability to render at that resolution with playable frame rates. Users with this combo should target 1080p or 1440p Low to get the most out of the hardware.

The Verdict

Based on the measured data, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc B570 combination can run Rust, but only under specific conditions. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, the system cannot run the game at a playable level, as no preset achieves an average of 60 FPS or higher. At 2560x1440, the system can run Rust, but only on the Low preset, which delivers an average of 81 FPS. At 1920x1080, the system offers the most flexibility, with High, Medium, and Low presets all clearing the 60 FPS threshold, with High being the best setting at 67 FPS average.

For gamers with a 1080p monitor, this combo is a solid choice for Rust, providing a smooth experience on medium-to-high settings. For 1440p users, the system is playable but requires significant graphical compromises, sticking to the Low preset to maintain a stable frame rate. For 4K, this hardware is not suitable for Rust, as even the lowest settings fail to reach playable frame rates. The Intel Arc B570's performance, while respectable for its class, is not sufficient for the high-resolution demands of this title. The data shows that this combo ranks 2996 out of 3723 tested combinations in Rust, placing it in the lower half of the performance spectrum. This rank underscores that while the system is functional, it is not a high-end performer for this specific game.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K resolution?

A: No, at 3840x2160, the system does not achieve playable frame rates on any preset. The highest average FPS is 48 on Low, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Low preset is the only playable option at 2560x1440, achieving an average of 81 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS.

Q: What average frame rate does the High preset achieve at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 67 FPS, with the minimum and maximum not specified but the average clearing the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does this combo compare to other tested systems in Rust?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2996 out of 3723 tested combos, placing it in the lower half of performance for this game.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: The data indicates the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions, but at 1080p, the CPU's strong performance (94th percentile) allows the system to reach high frame rates like 118 FPS on Low, suggesting the GPU is still the limiting factor for higher presets.

Q: What is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS at 1080p?

A: The High preset is the most demanding playable option at 1080p, with an average FPS of 67. The Ultra preset drops to 51 FPS and is not playable.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations for Rust, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc B570 setup holds a rank of 2996 out of 3723 combos. This places it in the 20th percentile of performance, meaning roughly 80% of tested systems deliver better results in this game. The ranking reflects the GPU's limitations, as the Arc B570 sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU is a top-tier part at the 94th percentile.

The GPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with a delta of 0.1% and the Intel Arc A750 with a delta of -0.1%. These close scores indicate that the Arc B570 is in a competitive mid-range segment, but it lacks the raw power needed for Rust's demanding rendering. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.2% delta) and Intel Core i7-14700KF (-0.2% delta), are all high-end parts, confirming that the processor is not the limiting factor.

The low rank in game is a direct consequence of the GPU's inability to maintain high frame rates at 1440p and 4K. While the combo is adequate for 1080p gaming, it does not stand out in the broader benchmark database. For users seeking a higher rank and better performance in Rust, a more powerful GPU would be necessary. The data shows that this pairing is a capable 1080p solution, but it is not a high-ranking performer in the full spectrum of tested hardware.