Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Overpower
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 99 | 119 | 128 | 205 |
| 1440p QHD | 116 | 140 | 151 | 241 |
| 1080p Full HD | 130 | 157 | 169 | 271 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Overpower on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 201st out of 3713 tested combos in Overpower, placing it firmly in the top 5.5% of all systems benchmarked for this title. This is a high-end pairing that sits comfortably above the median, with the RTX 4080 holding the 86th percentile among all GPUs and the i7-14700F landing in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The data shows that this combo is not merely playable but exceptionally capable, delivering triple-digit frame rates at every resolution tested, with the weakest result being a 99 FPS average at 4K Ultra settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The rank of 201 out of 3713 represents the 94.6th percentile of all tested combinations for Overpower. This is an elite-tier position, meaning roughly 94 of every 100 systems tested will perform worse than this pairing. The i7-14700F contributes strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 19620, while the RTX 4080 delivers a Passmark G3D score of 34457 — both figures are well above their respective medians.
The combo’s strength is most evident in the margin of headroom it maintains over the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 1440p Ultra, the average sits at 116 FPS — nearly double the playability baseline. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 99 FPS, still 39 FPS above the threshold. This headroom is consistent across all settings, indicating that the bottleneck is rarely the hardware and more often the game’s engine limits or the specific preset’s demands.
The CPU’s single-core performance is also relevant here: a Geekbench single-core score of 2429 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958 ensure that even in CPU-bound scenes, the i7-14700F keeps up. The 20-core, 28-thread configuration with a 5.40 GHz boost clock provides ample parallel throughput, and the 33 MB of shared L3 cache helps with game asset streaming. In practice, this means the combo’s rank is driven by balanced performance — neither the CPU nor GPU drags the other down in Overpower’s Action-based workloads.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the i7-14700F are all within a 0.8% margin of its average benchmark score of 53620. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701 (-0.2%), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469 (+0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288 (+0.6%), and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206 (+0.8%). For gaming specifically, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is the most practical alternative — it delivers nearly identical CPU performance in synthetic tests and would behave similarly in Overpower, though it uses a different platform with DDR5 memory support.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4080’s nearest rivals are exceptionally close. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209 (just 0.1% higher), making it effectively a drop-in equivalent for performance purposes. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (-1.1%), while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (-2.6%) and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (-2.7%). The 4080 SUPER is the obvious substitute if the exact RTX 4080 model is unavailable — the measured FPS would be essentially identical. The AMD options, while scoring slightly higher in synthetic benchmarks, would show comparable in-game behavior, though driver-level differences could shift results by a few frames.
If you are considering a system with this CPU but a different GPU, or this GPU with a different CPU, the data suggests the CPU is not a limiting factor. The 7900X’s 0.6% higher average score means it would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates, and the Xeon 6505P’s -0.2% delta is also within noise. For pure gaming, any of these CPU alternatives would maintain the same 60+ FPS profile at all resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Overpower at 4K?
A: Yes. The verdict data lists all four settings presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — as playable at 3840x2160. The best setting is Ultra with an average of 99 FPS, which is 39 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest FPS this combo achieves in Overpower?
A: The maximum measured average is 271 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next highest is 241 FPS at 2560x1440 with Low settings, followed by 205 FPS at 3840x2160 with Low settings.
Q: How much headroom is there at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, even the most demanding Ultra preset averages 116 FPS, which is 56 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset averages 151 FPS, High averages 140 FPS, and Low averages 241 FPS.
Q: Is the RTX 4080 the bottleneck or the i7-14700F?
A: The benchmark data shows no obvious single bottleneck. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking are both high, and the combo ranks in the 94.6th percentile overall. The gap between the 1080p Low average (271 FPS) and the 4K Ultra average (99 FPS) suggests the GPU becomes more stressed at higher resolutions, but it still clears the threshold easily.
Q: Does the CPU’s 65 W TDP affect gaming performance?
A: The data shows strong results despite the modest TDP. The i7-14700F achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 41317, which are high enough to feed the RTX 4080 in Overpower. The 28 threads and 5.40 GHz boost clock provide sufficient single-thread responsiveness for game logic.
Q: How does this combo compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER?
A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080’s 54247 score — a negligible difference. In Overpower, you would expect virtually identical FPS figures, with the SUPER possibly edging out a frame or two in specific scenes.
The Verdict
This PC can run Overpower with outstanding results at every resolution tested. The verdict data confirms that all four settings presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080. The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and the combo clears it by a wide margin in every configuration.
At 4K Ultra, the average is 99 FPS — not just playable but smooth for high-refresh gaming. At 1440p Ultra, the average rises to 116 FPS, and at 1080p Ultra it reaches 130 FPS. The best settings per resolution are always Ultra, with the highest measured average being 130 FPS at 1080p Ultra. If you own a 144Hz or 165Hz monitor, this combo will keep you near the refresh ceiling at 1080p and 1440p in most scenes, while 4K Ultra remains comfortably above 60 FPS. There is no scenario in the measured data where this hardware falls below the playable threshold, making it a reliable choice for Overpower at any resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, with min/max values recorded only for Medium settings.
3840x2160 (4K):
- Low: 205 FPS average
- Medium: 128 FPS average, 109 FPS minimum, 147 FPS maximum
- High: 119 FPS average
- Ultra: 99 FPS average
2560x1440 (1440p):
- Low: 241 FPS average
- Medium: 151 FPS average, 128 FPS minimum, 173 FPS maximum
- High: 140 FPS average
- Ultra: 116 FPS average
1920x1080 (1080p):
- Low: 271 FPS average
- Medium: 169 FPS average, 144 FPS minimum, 194 FPS maximum
- High: 157 FPS average
- Ultra: 130 FPS average
The min/max figures for Medium settings show consistent frame pacing: at 4K Medium, the 109 FPS minimum is still 49 FPS above the playable threshold, and at 1080p Medium, the 144 FPS minimum never dips below double the 60 FPS baseline. The spread between average and minimum is roughly 19-25 FPS across all Medium presets, indicating stable performance without severe drops.
Best Settings per Resolution
3840x2160: The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 99 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 4K, as it provides the highest visual quality while maintaining 39 FPS of headroom above the playable threshold. The next step down, High, averages 119 FPS, but Ultra’s 99 FPS is still well within smooth territory.
2560x1440: Ultra is the best setting, averaging 116 FPS. This leaves 56 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, making it safe for demanding scenes. The Medium preset averages 151 FPS with a minimum of 128 FPS, which is useful if you prefer extra margin, but Ultra is the clear choice for image quality.
1920x1080: Ultra averages 130 FPS, which is the highest measured average at this resolution for the most demanding preset. This gives 70 FPS of headroom above the threshold. The Medium preset averages 169 FPS with a 144 FPS minimum, but Ultra’s 130 FPS average is still more than sufficient for a 120Hz or 144Hz display. For maximum competitiveness, Low averages 271 FPS, which would benefit a 240Hz monitor, but Ultra is the best balance of fidelity and speed.