Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Overpower
Action 2023

Overpower

49%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
65 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
31 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
58 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
28 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
49 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
24 FPS
26.3ms Frame Time
39ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,513
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 27,382
Your GPU 1,184

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 24 28 31 49
1440p QHD 28 34 36 58
1080p Full HD 31 38 41 65

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 38
1920x1080 Low 65
1920x1080 Medium 41
1920x1080 Ultra 31
2560x1440 High 34
2560x1440 Low 58
2560x1440 Medium 36
2560x1440 Ultra 28
3840x2160 High 28
3840x2160 Low 49
3840x2160 Medium 31
3840x2160 Ultra 24

Performance Analysis: Overpower on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a highly constrained gaming experience in Overpower, with the GPU acting as the definitive bottleneck. While the CPU is a strong performer, ranking in the 85th percentile among all tested processors, the Arc B370 sits at only the 5th percentile for GPUs, and this massive disparity is reflected directly in the frame rate data. The combination only achieves a playable 60 FPS threshold at 1080p with the lowest settings preset. At higher resolutions, the system falls well below the playability threshold, making the Arc B370 the primary limiting factor for this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this combination shows a clear pattern: performance scales almost exclusively with resolution and settings, with the GPU's limited capabilities capping output at every tier. At 1920x1080, the most promising results appear. With the Low preset, the system delivers an average of 65 FPS, which is the only recorded average above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Medium preset drops to an average of 41 FPS, with a minimum of 34 FPS and a maximum of 47 FPS. High settings produce an average of 38 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields an average of 31 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at this resolution is substantial, a 24 FPS difference, which indicates that the step up in graphical load disproportionately impacts the GPU.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance profile shifts downward significantly. The Low preset at this resolution averages 58 FPS, which is just 2 FPS short of the 60 FPS target. This is the closest any higher resolution comes to playability. Medium settings at 1440p produce an average of 36 FPS, with a minimum of 31 FPS and a maximum of 42 FPS. High settings average 34 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to an average of 28 FPS. The data shows a consistent decline, with the Medium preset's minimum frame rate of 31 FPS indicating that even the average figures are somewhat optimistic for sustained gameplay.

At 3840x2160, 4K resolution, the system struggles to maintain fluid motion across all settings. The Low preset produces the highest average at this resolution, 49 FPS, but this is still 11 FPS below the playable threshold. Medium settings average 31 FPS, with a minimum of 26 FPS and a maximum of 35 FPS. High settings average 28 FPS, and the Ultra preset yields a 24 FPS average. The minimum recorded frame rate across all 4K tests is 26 FPS, which would produce noticeable stuttering and a broken experience for most users. The recorded data for this resolution shows that the GPU is simply overwhelmed by the pixel count, regardless of the quality settings applied.

Best Settings per Resolution

The verdict data is unambiguous: this combination can only clear the 60 FPS playable threshold at a single resolution and settings combination. At 1920x1080, the best settings are Low, which delivers an average of 65 FPS. This is the only configuration in the entire measured data set where the system achieves the playable threshold. The Low preset at 1080p provides enough headroom above the 60 FPS target to allow for minor frame time variance without dropping below playability.

For 2560x1440, the verdict is that no settings are playable. The closest option is the Low preset, which averages 58 FPS, but this still falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The system cannot maintain the required frame rate at this resolution, and the data shows no configuration that would allow for a consistent experience. Similarly, at 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. The best average at 4K is 49 FPS on Low, which is significantly below the threshold. The system's performance at these resolutions makes them unsuitable for gameplay, as even the lowest quality presets cannot reach the target frame rate.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combination can achieve in Overpower?

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 65 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: Can this system run Overpower at 2560x1440 resolution?

A: No. The verdict data shows no playable settings at 2560x1440. The best average frame rate at this resolution is 58 FPS on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Medium settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 65 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 41 FPS. This represents a 24 FPS drop when moving from Low to Medium settings.

Q: Does the system ever reach 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: No. The highest average frame rate at 3840x2160 is 49 FPS, which occurs on Low settings. All other settings at this resolution produce averages below 32 FPS.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates recorded for the Medium preset at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the minimum recorded frame rate is 31 FPS, and the maximum is 42 FPS, with an average of 36 FPS.

Q: How does this GPU compare to its nearest rivals in terms of benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, a delta of -0.2%. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, a delta of -0.5%, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, a delta of -0.7%.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Arc B370's benchmark score places it in a performance class with several older discrete and mobile graphics solutions. The nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192, and the AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168. The Arc B370's score of 1184 falls squarely within this group, with deltas ranging from -0.7% to +1.4%. Systems using any of these GPUs would be expected to produce very similar frame rates in Overpower, meaning they would also struggle to exceed 60 FPS at 1080p and would be largely unplayable at higher resolutions.

On the CPU side, the Intel Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365, placing it in the 85th percentile. Its nearest rivals are all Intel processors with very close scores. The Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403, a delta of -0.1%, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, a delta of -0.2%. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, a delta of 0.2%, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, a delta of 0.2%. This indicates that swapping the i7-12700KF for any of these alternatives would have virtually no impact on gaming performance in this title, as the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's performance is far more than sufficient for Overpower, and its headroom is wasted due to the GPU's constraints.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's ranking of tested hardware combinations for Overpower, this pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3427 out of 3713 total combinations. This places it in the bottom 8% of all tested systems, which is consistent with the GPU's low 5th percentile ranking. The CPU's high percentile ranking does not boost the overall combo, as the GPU's performance ceiling dictates the final results. The data shows that this is a severely imbalanced pairing for this particular game, with the CPU providing far more computational power than the GPU can utilize. The rank of 3427 out of 3713 reflects the system's inability to handle Overpower at higher settings or resolutions, making it a low-tier performer in the database's overall comparison.

The Verdict

This PC can technically run Overpower, but only under the most restrictive conditions. The verdict by resolution confirms that the system clears the 60 FPS playable threshold exclusively at 1920x1080 with the Low preset, achieving an average of 65 FPS. This is the sole configuration where the game is playable. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the system fails to reach 60 FPS on any settings preset, with the best results being 58 FPS and 49 FPS respectively, both on Low settings.

The data indicates that the Intel Arc B370 is the decisive bottleneck. Its 5th percentile ranking and benchmark score of 1184, which is comparable to much older graphics hardware, prevents the system from delivering playable frame rates at anything above 1080p Low. Users seeking to play Overpower with this combination must accept the lowest visual quality at 1080p to maintain a playable experience. Any attempt to increase the settings preset or resolution will result in frame rates that fall below the playable threshold, often by a significant margin. The system is not suitable for higher fidelity gameplay in this title.