Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Overpower
Action 2023

Overpower

33%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
156 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
72 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
137 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
67 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
117 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
57 FPS
11ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,513
Your CPU 2,254
Graphics Card
Required 27,382
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 67 73 117
1440p QHD 67 82 84 137
1080p Full HD 72 91 94 156

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 91
1920x1080 Low 156
1920x1080 Medium 94
1920x1080 Ultra 72
2560x1440 High 82
2560x1440 Low 137
2560x1440 Medium 84
2560x1440 Ultra 67
3840x2160 High 67
3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 73
3840x2160 Ultra 57

Performance Analysis: Overpower on Your System

The Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a wide spread of performance in Overpower, depending on how the user prioritizes resolution against graphical fidelity. At 1920x1080, the pairing is overwhelmingly capable, pushing average frame rates well past the 60 FPS threshold even at the highest settings. Moving to 2560x1440, the combo maintains a smooth experience across all presets, though the gap between Low and Ultra narrows. At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits, with the Ultra preset dipping below the playable threshold, indicating that the GPU is being pushed harder at higher pixel counts. The recorded data suggests a system that is well balanced for mainstream gaming, with a clear performance ceiling at 4K Ultra.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database contains measured average frame rates for this specific CPU and GPU pairing across three resolutions and four settings presets. The data shows a consistent pattern of performance scaling with both resolution and settings.

At 1920x1080, the lowest preset recorded an average of 155.8 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 93.7 FPS, while High averages 90.7 FPS. The most demanding option, Ultra, still maintains an average of 72.2 FPS. This indicates that at Full HD, the system has substantial headroom, with even the heaviest settings leaving a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the averages remain strong. Low settings yield 136.9 FPS, Medium produces 84.3 FPS, and High records 82 FPS. Ultra at this resolution averages 66.7 FPS, which is still above the playable threshold but shows a marked decline compared to the 1080p result. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra represents a drop of roughly 5.5 FPS, suggesting the GPU is becoming a more significant factor.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens. Low settings average 116.6 FPS, Medium drops to 73.1 FPS, and High lands at 66.6 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 57.3 FPS, which sits below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is 9.3 FPS, a larger gap than at lower resolutions, indicating that the most demanding settings at 4K are taxing the GPU heavily.

The data shows no recorded minimum or maximum frame rates, only averages. This means the analysis relies on the average FPS values, which provide a solid indication of overall smoothness but do not capture frame time spikes or stutter events.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database lists nearest rivals for both the CPU and GPU, based on aggregate benchmark scores. These comparisons help contextualize where this hardware sits relative to other options.

For the Intel Core i5-9400, the closest rival is the Intel Core i7-1068NG7, which has an average score 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i3-10305 scores 0.4% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 scores 0.4% higher. The Intel Core i7-10710U scores 0.3% higher. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the i5-9400 performs essentially on par with these alternatives in general compute tasks. For gaming, the differences are likely negligible, as the CPU is not typically the primary bottleneck in this combination.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, the nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 0.3% lower, the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 0.5% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 0.7% lower. These are all older or lower-tier parts, yet they fall within a narrow band of aggregate benchmark performance. This suggests that in general GPU compute, the RTX 4060 is closely matched to these cards, though the RTX 4060 brings modern features like ray tracing and DLSS support that are not reflected in the raw benchmark scores.

The implication for Overpower is that users with any of these rival GPUs could expect broadly similar frame rates at the same settings, assuming the CPU does not become a limiting factor. The i5-9400's rivals are all within a 0.8% performance envelope, so CPU-driven differences in this game are likely minimal.

How This Combo Ranks

The database places this specific CPU and GPU combination at rank 1990 out of 3713 tested combos for Overpower. This puts it in the upper-middle tier of all possible pairings, roughly in the 46th percentile of tested systems. The ranking reflects the balance between the i5-9400's moderate multi-core performance and the RTX 4060's solid mid-range GPU capabilities.

Given the measured frame rates, this rank seems appropriate. The combo handles 1080p and 1440p with ease, and it manages 4K at most settings. It is not a top-tier system for this game, as higher-end CPUs and GPUs would likely push the rank higher, but it is far from a weak performer. The fact that the combo clears 60 FPS at 1440p Ultra and 4K High suggests it is well suited for gamers who want high refresh rates at lower resolutions or solid 4K performance at slightly reduced settings.

The rank of 1990 out of 3713 indicates that a little over half of all tested combos perform better, but the practical differences depend heavily on the specific game and settings. For Overpower, this combo is firmly in the playable range across most configurations.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is clear from the recorded data. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets are playable, meaning they achieve an average of at least 60 FPS. The best playable setting is Ultra, with an average of 72.2 FPS. This is a strong result, indicating the system can run the game at maximum fidelity with a comfortable frame rate.

At 2560x1440, all presets also clear the 60 FPS threshold. The best setting is Ultra, averaging 66.7 FPS. This is a solid 1440p experience, though the margin above the threshold is narrower than at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best at an average of 66.6 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 57.3 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. Therefore, for 4K gaming, users must select High or lower to maintain smooth performance.

The verdict is that this PC can run Overpower well, with the caveat that 4K Ultra is not viable. For most users, the sweet spot will be 1440p Ultra or 1080p Ultra, both of which deliver averages well above 60 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component matters more for Overpower. The data shows that the GPU is the primary driver of performance, especially as resolution increases.

Comparing 1080p to 1440p at the same preset reveals the GPU load scaling. At Low settings, the drop from 155.8 FPS to 136.9 FPS is a 12% reduction. At Medium, the drop from 93.7 FPS to 84.3 FPS is a 10% reduction. At High, the drop from 90.7 FPS to 82 FPS is a 9.6% reduction. At Ultra, the drop from 72.2 FPS to 66.7 FPS is a 7.6% reduction. The smaller percentage drop at Ultra suggests that at higher settings, the GPU is already working harder, so the added resolution has a relatively smaller impact.

Moving from 1440p to 4K shows a more pronounced GPU dependency. At Low settings, the average falls from 136.9 FPS to 116.6 FPS, a 14.8% reduction. At Medium, it falls from 84.3 FPS to 73.1 FPS, a 13.3% reduction. At High, it falls from 82 FPS to 66.6 FPS, an 18.8% reduction. At Ultra, it falls from 66.7 FPS to 57.3 FPS, a 14.1% reduction. The High preset shows the largest percentage drop, indicating that the combination of high resolution and high settings is where the GPU is most stressed.

The CPU's role appears less critical, as the i5-9400's six cores and six threads provide adequate processing for the game's demands. The minimal differences between the CPU and its rivals, all within 0.8% in aggregate benchmarks, suggest that CPU-bound scenarios are rare in Overpower. The data implies that users with a stronger GPU paired with this CPU would see more benefit than users with a stronger CPU paired with this GPU.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Overpower at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but not at the Ultra preset. The playable settings at 3840x2160 are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best at an average of 66.6 FPS. Ultra falls to 57.3 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest settings preset that maintains 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: All four presets at 1440p are playable. The best is Ultra, with an average of 66.7 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score 0.2% lower than the Radeon HD 7790. This is a negligible difference in aggregate performance, though the RTX 4060 offers features like ray tracing and DLSS that the older card lacks.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-9400 a bottleneck for the RTX 4060 in this game?

A: The data does not indicate a significant CPU bottleneck. The i5-9400's nearest CPU rival, the Intel Core i7-1068NG7, scores only 0.2% higher on average, and the performance scaling between resolutions is consistent with a GPU-bound workload.

Q: What average frame rate can I expect at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: The recorded average is 90.7 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Which setting should I choose for the best visual quality while staying above 60 FPS at 4K?

A: High settings provide the best visual quality that remains playable at 4K, with an average of 66.6 FPS. The Ultra preset is not playable at this resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database identifies the most demanding preset that still achieves at least 60 FPS average at each resolution. These are the optimal settings for balancing visual fidelity with smooth performance.

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra, with a recorded average of 72.2 FPS. This allows the user to experience the game at maximum graphical detail while maintaining a frame rate comfortably above the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, averaging 66.7 FPS. The margin above 60 FPS is smaller than at 1080p, but it is still sufficient for a smooth experience.

At 3840x2160, the best setting is High, with an average of 66.6 FPS. The Ultra preset is not viable at 4K, so High represents the peak visual quality that remains playable. Users who prefer higher frame rates at 4K can opt for Medium at 73.1 FPS or Low at 116.6 FPS, but High offers the best balance of quality and performance.

These recommended settings ensure that the system stays above the 60 FPS playable threshold, providing a responsive and visually appealing experience across all resolutions.