Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Overpower
Action 2023

Overpower

89%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
126 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
58 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
112 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
52 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
96 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
46 FPS
13.3ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,513
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 27,382
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 46 54 61 96
1440p QHD 52 63 70 112
1080p Full HD 58 75 76 126

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 75
1920x1080 Low 126
1920x1080 Medium 76
1920x1080 Ultra 58
2560x1440 High 63
2560x1440 Low 112
2560x1440 Medium 70
2560x1440 Ultra 52
3840x2160 High 54
3840x2160 Low 96
3840x2160 Medium 61
3840x2160 Ultra 46

Performance Analysis: Overpower on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a playable experience in Overpower at most resolution and settings combinations, though the data shows clear limits at the highest presets. The Arc B580’s 12 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for the game’s demands at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K Ultra. The CPU, with its 14 cores and 20 threads boosting to 5.30 GHz, keeps pace across all tested scenarios, as indicated by the benchmark results. The measured FPS data, which is marked as measured rather than estimated, shows that the combo ranks 2819 out of 3713 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database. This is not a top-tier pairing, but it handles the game’s action genre adequately when settings are tuned appropriately.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its strongest results. Low settings yield an average of 125.7 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 76.0 FPS average, still comfortably above the threshold. High settings average 74.8 FPS, nearly identical to Medium, indicating that the GPU has headroom at this resolution. Ultra settings, however, fall to 57.9 FPS average, just below the 60 FPS line, making it the only non-playable preset at 1080p.

Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern shifts slightly. Low settings average 112.0 FPS, which is excellent for a higher resolution. Medium settings average 69.5 FPS, remaining playable. High settings average 62.7 FPS, just above the threshold, while Ultra drops to 52.2 FPS, clearly below the playable mark. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 59.8 FPS, showing a significant performance cost for the highest preset.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limits become apparent. Low settings average 95.6 FPS, which is surprisingly strong for 4K. Medium settings average 61.0 FPS, barely crossing the playable threshold. High settings average 53.6 FPS, falling short, and Ultra averages 45.9 FPS, the lowest result in the entire dataset. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 49.7 FPS, demonstrating that the Arc B580 handles the game’s lower presets well but cannot sustain high visual fidelity at this resolution.

The data shows no min or max FPS values are reported, so only average FPS is available for analysis. Across all resolutions, the trend is consistent: Low and Medium presets are generally playable, High is playable at 1080p and 1440p but not 4K, and Ultra is only playable at no resolution tested. The 60 FPS threshold is used as the playability cutoff, and the numbers indicate that users should prioritize Medium or High settings depending on their resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14600KF, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with a score of 49228 and a deltaPct of 0.3, meaning the i5-14600KF is 0.3% faster. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196 with a deltaPct of 0.4, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995 with a deltaPct of 0.8. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796 with a deltaPct of -0.8, meaning it is 0.8% faster than the i5-14600KF. These CPUs would behave nearly identically in Overpower, as the performance differences are within 1% of each other.

For the Intel Arc B580, the nearest rivals are more varied. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061 with a deltaPct of -0.2, making it 0.2% slower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895 with a deltaPct of 0.6, meaning the Arc B580 is 0.6% faster. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172 with a deltaPct of -0.7, making it 0.7% faster than the Arc B580. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249 with a deltaPct of -1, meaning it is 1% faster. These GPUs would produce similar FPS numbers in Overpower, with the RTX 3080 and P106-100 being slightly ahead and the RX 580 2048SP and RTX 2080 being slightly behind.

In practical terms, if a user has any of these rival components, the gameplay experience in Overpower would be nearly indistinguishable from the i5-14600KF + Arc B580 combo. The largest delta among all rivals is 1%, which translates to less than 1 FPS difference at most settings. This means that swapping any of these parts for the ones in this combo would not change the playability verdict at any resolution or preset.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2819 out of 3713 tested combinations in Overpower, placing it in the 24th percentile of tested systems. This is a low-to-mid ranking, indicating that a majority of tested combos perform better in this game. However, the rank does not tell the whole story, as the combo still achieves playable FPS at most settings. The ranking reflects the fact that many other systems have more powerful GPUs or CPUs, but for a mid-range pairing, the i5-14600KF + Arc B580 delivers acceptable performance.

The CPU alone ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, which is strong, while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The discrepancy between these two percentiles explains the combo’s overall ranking: the CPU is capable, but the GPU holds back the system in Overpower. The data indicates that the combo is CPU-limited at lower resolutions and GPU-limited at higher resolutions, which is typical for a system with a strong processor and a mid-range graphics card. Users should expect this combo to outperform many budget systems but fall behind those with higher-end GPUs.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Overpower at 60 FPS on 1920x1080 with High settings?*

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 High is 74.8, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: High settings, with an average FPS of 62.7, is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. Medium and Low are also playable, but High offers better visual quality.

Q: Is Ultra settings playable at any resolution?

A: No. At 1920x1080 Ultra averages 57.9 FPS, at 2560x1440 Ultra averages 52.2 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Ultra averages 45.9 FPS. All are below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in this game?

A: The RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23172, which is 0.7% higher than the Arc B580’s score. This translates to roughly the same FPS in Overpower, with the RTX 3080 being slightly ahead.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it is a high-performing processor for this game.

Q: Does the combo perform better at 1080p or 1440p?

A: The average FPS is higher at 1080p across all settings. For example, High settings average 74.8 FPS at 1080p versus 62.7 FPS at 1440p, showing a 12.1 FPS difference.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows that the CPU and GPU play different roles depending on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s performance is more prominent, as the GPU has enough bandwidth to render frames quickly. The difference between Low (125.7 FPS) and Ultra (57.9 FPS) is 67.8 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the primary driver even at this resolution, but the CPU’s 90th percentile ranking ensures it does not bottleneck. At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take over as the limiting factor, with the gap between Low (112.0 FPS) and Ultra (52.2 FPS) growing to 59.8 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as the gap between Low (95.6 FPS) and Ultra (45.9 FPS) is 49.7 FPS, and even High settings cannot maintain 60 FPS.

The scaling between resolutions confirms this. From 1080p Low to 1440p Low, FPS drops from 125.7 to 112.0, a 10.9% decrease. From 1440p Low to 4K Low, FPS drops to 95.6, a 14.6% decrease. This suggests that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and shading units are stretched at higher resolutions. The CPU’s role is more evident at lower settings, where frame rates are high enough to require fast single-thread performance. The i5-14600KF’s single-core benchmark score of 4594 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle high-FPS scenarios without limiting the GPU.

At higher presets, the GPU’s compute resources become the deciding factor. The Arc B580’s FP32 performance of 13.67 TFLOPS and its 20 ray tracing cores are sufficient for Medium settings at 4K (61.0 FPS) but not for High (53.6 FPS). The data suggests that users with this combo should expect CPU-bound behavior at 1080p Low and GPU-bound behavior at 4K Ultra, with a transition zone in between.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is High, with an average FPS of 74.8. This is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, and it offers the best visual quality while maintaining smooth performance. Medium averages 76.0 FPS, which is nearly identical, but High provides superior graphics. Low averages 125.7 FPS, which is overkill for most displays, and Ultra falls below the threshold at 57.9 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is also High, with an average FPS of 62.7. This is a narrow margin above the 60 FPS threshold, but it is playable. Medium averages 69.5 FPS, providing more headroom, but High is the most demanding option that remains playable. Low averages 112.0 FPS for those who prioritize frame rate over visuals, and Ultra is not playable at 52.2 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Medium, with an average FPS of 61.0. This is just above the threshold, making it the only playable preset above Low at this resolution. Low averages 95.6 FPS, which is a safer choice for consistent performance, but Medium offers better image quality. High averages 53.6 FPS and Ultra averages 45.9 FPS, both below the playable threshold. Users with a 4K display should stick to Medium or Low to avoid frame rate drops.