Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Overpower
Action 2023

Overpower

72%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
123 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
61 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
108 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
51 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
93 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
48 FPS
13.5ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,513
Your CPU 25,292
Graphics Card
Required 27,382
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 48 53 62 93
1440p QHD 51 67 71 108
1080p Full HD 61 74 74 123

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 74
1920x1080 Low 123
1920x1080 Medium 74
1920x1080 Ultra 61
2560x1440 High 67
2560x1440 Low 108
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 51
3840x2160 High 53
3840x2160 Low 93
3840x2160 Medium 62
3840x2160 Ultra 48

Performance Analysis: Overpower on Your System

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a balanced mid-range configuration for Overpower, an Action title released on 2023-08-14. Benchmark data shows this combo ranks 2831 out of 3713 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the pack, yet the measured frame rates reveal a system capable of smooth gameplay at most settings. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 68th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a pairing where the graphics card is the more likely bottleneck in demanding scenarios. The data is measured, not estimated, providing concrete expectations for performance across three resolutions and four quality presets.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Overpower at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1920x1080?*

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 Ultra is 61, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a single frame. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440 that stays above 60 FPS?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 67.2 FPS, making it the best playable option. Ultra at this resolution drops to 50.7 FPS, below the threshold.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-13400F a bottleneck for the Intel Arc B580 in this game?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25292, while the GPU’s average is 23021. The CPU outperforms the GPU in raw benchmark scoring, and nearest rival data shows the GPU is closely matched with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (deltaPct 0.6), suggesting the graphics card is the limiting factor at higher settings.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in this context?

A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, while the RTX 3080 scores 23172, a deltaPct of -0.7. This means the RTX 3080 is roughly 0.7% faster on average, a negligible difference for gaming performance.

Q: What is the playable settings list for 3840x2160?

A: At 4K, the playable settings are Low (93.3 FPS) and Medium (61.7 FPS). High (53.3 FPS) and Ultra (48 FPS) both fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Does the CPU’s single-thread performance support high FPS at low settings?

A: The CPU’s 3dmark_single_thread score is 960, and its passmark_single_thread score is 3634. At 1920x1080 Low, the system achieves 122.7 FPS, indicating the CPU can drive high frame rates when the GPU is not heavily loaded.

CPU and GPU Roles

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13400F and the Intel Arc B580 shifts with resolution and preset. At 1920x1080 Low, the system produces 122.7 FPS, which is the highest measured frame rate across all tests. This suggests that at lower resolutions and settings, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently, and the graphics card is not the primary constraint. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, provide ample headroom for high-refresh gameplay in less demanding scenes.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the gap between Low and Ultra narrows. Low yields 107.9 FPS, while Ultra drops to 50.7 FPS. This 57.2 FPS spread indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly dominant in determining performance. The Arc B580’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p, but the rendering load at Ultra presets pushes the GPU to its limits, showing a clear shift from CPU-bound to GPU-bound behavior.

At 3840x2160, the pattern intensifies. Low settings still deliver 93.3 FPS, but Ultra falls to 48 FPS, a 45.3 FPS drop. The GPU’s FP32 compute of 13.67 TFLOPS and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s are strained at 4K Ultra, where pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s becomes a limiting factor. The CPU’s role diminishes further, as the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. Across all resolutions, the CPU maintains consistent performance, but the GPU’s scaling from Low to Ultra dictates the final playability.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable performance across all presets. Low settings average 122.7 FPS, Medium 74.4 FPS, High 73.5 FPS, and Ultra 61 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is a significant 48.3 FPS drop, while the difference between Medium and High is only 0.9 FPS. Ultra incurs a further 12.5 FPS reduction, landing exactly at the 60 FPS threshold. No minimum or maximum FPS values were recorded, so all analysis relies on averages.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but with a wider spread. Low averages 107.9 FPS, Medium 70.5 FPS, High 67.2 FPS, and Ultra 50.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 37.4 FPS, and the gap between High and Ultra is 16.5 FPS. Ultra is the only preset that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it unplayable by the defined standard. The data shows that 1440p High is the sweet spot, offering a 6.7 FPS improvement over the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, performance drops considerably. Low settings produce 93.3 FPS, Medium 61.7 FPS, High 53.3 FPS, and Ultra 48 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 31.6 FPS, and from Medium to High is 8.4 FPS. Only Low and Medium clear the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra at 48 FPS is 12 FPS below the playable mark, indicating that 4K gaming requires reduced settings for smooth gameplay. The data suggests that this combination is better suited to 1080p and 1440p, with 4K reserved for lower presets.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292, placing it in the 77th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS with an average score of 25284 and a deltaPct of 0, meaning they are virtually identical in performance. The Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362, a deltaPct of -0.3, indicating it is 0.3% slower. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D also scores 25365, another -0.3% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201, a deltaPct of 0.4, making it 0.4% faster. Any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Overpower, so users upgrading from one of these parts should expect no meaningful change in CPU-bound scenarios.

The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, placing it in the 68th percentile. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster of performance. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, a deltaPct of -0.2, making it 0.2% slower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, a deltaPct of 0.6, meaning it is 0.6% faster. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, a deltaPct of -0.7, indicating it is 0.7% slower. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, a deltaPct of -1, making it 1% slower. This grouping shows that the Arc B580 performs within 1% of these cards, so swapping between them would yield no perceptible difference in Overpower frame rates.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 61 FPS. This allows users to max out visual quality while maintaining playability. For those seeking higher frame rates, High offers 73.5 FPS, and Low reaches 122.7 FPS, but Ultra remains the best balance of fidelity and performance.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, averaging 67.2 FPS. This provides a 7.2 FPS buffer above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium delivers 70.5 FPS, but High offers better visual quality without sacrificing playability. Ultra at 50.7 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the threshold.

At 3840x2160, the best playable preset is Medium, averaging 61.7 FPS. This is the only preset above 60 FPS besides Low, which averages 93.3 FPS. Medium provides improved visuals over Low while maintaining a playable frame rate. High at 53.3 FPS and Ultra at 48 FPS are both below the threshold and should be avoided for smooth gameplay.

The Verdict

This PC configuration can run Overpower effectively, but the playable settings vary significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra at 61 FPS being the most demanding playable option. This makes 1080p the most versatile resolution for this setup, allowing users to enjoy maximum quality without compromise.

At 2560x1440, the system handles Low, Medium, and High presets above 60 FPS, with High at 67.2 FPS being the best visual option. Ultra falls to 50.7 FPS, so users must choose between slightly reduced quality and smooth performance. The data indicates that 1440p gaming is viable, but not at the highest settings.

At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium presets are playable, with Medium at 61.7 FPS being the best choice. High and Ultra drop below 60 FPS, making them unsuitable for consistent gameplay. This combination is capable of 4K, but only with reduced settings. Overall, the Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Arc B580 deliver a solid 1080p experience and a capable 1440p experience, with 4K requiring compromises. Users seeking 60 FPS at Ultra should stick to 1080p, while those prioritizing resolution should accept Medium settings at 1440p or 4K.