Overpower

The pairing of an Intel Core i5-11400F with an Intel Arc B370 is an unusual one: a six-core Rocket Lake desktop processor feeding a modest integrated graphics solution. The recorded frame-rate data for Overpower, an action title released in 2023, makes the resulting performance profile immediately clear. This combination clears the 60 FPS threshold at exactly one point in the tested matrix, 1920x1080 at Low settings with an average of 65 FPS, and falls short everywhere else. The database ranks this combo 3427th out of 3713 tested configurations for this game, placing it near the bottom of the field. The following breakdown examines the measurements in detail.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the recorded averages climb from 31 FPS on Ultra to 65 FPS on Low, with Medium landing at 41 FPS and High at 38 FPS. The Medium run is the only one with full frame-time detail in the data: minimums dip to 34 FPS and peaks reach 47 FPS. That spread matters, because a 41 FPS average with a 34 FPS floor sits well below a comfortable threshold for an action game, where responsiveness depends on sustained frame delivery rather than peak throughput.

At 2560x1440, the averages compress considerably: Low reaches 58 FPS, Medium 36 FPS (with a minimum of 31 and a maximum of 42), High 34 FPS, and Ultra 28 FPS. Even the Lowest preset misses 60 FPS by a small margin at this resolution, which effectively rules out 1440p play at any quality level on this hardware.

At 3840x2160, the numbers fall further: Low averages 49 FPS, Medium 31 FPS (minimum 26, maximum 35), High 28 FPS, and Ultra 24 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is large at every resolution, roughly a third of the Low result, which indicates the Medium preset enables significantly heavier rendering work, likely in areas the recorded data does not break down further.

A pattern worth noting: High settings deliver only a few frames below Medium at every resolution (38 versus 41 at 1080p, 34 versus 36 at 1440p, 28 versus 31 at 2160p), while the drop from Low to Medium is steep everywhere. The data suggests the biggest visual cost in Overpower sits in the step up to Medium, with High adding comparatively little additional load.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance story here is overwhelmingly GPU-bound. The Intel Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with a single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. The Core i5-11400F, by contrast, sits in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, with a multi-thread score of 5652 at max threads and a single-thread score of 868 in the same suite, plus a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14340.

The scaling between resolutions confirms this imbalance. Moving from 1920x1080 Low to 2560x1440 Low drops the average from 65 to 58 FPS, and further to 49 FPS at 3840x2160 Low. If the CPU were the limiting factor, raising resolution would produce flatter curves, since the processor load is largely resolution-independent. Instead, each pixel-count increase translates directly into lost frame rate across all four presets, the classic signature of a graphics subsystem running at its ceiling.

The preset scaling tells the same story. At 1080p, even the jump from Low (65 FPS) to Medium (41 FPS) subtracts 24 FPS, a drop the i5-11400F's CPU-side numbers cannot explain given its position in the 71st percentile. The processor has headroom; the graphics side does not. For this game on this machine, every resolution and every preset is limited by the Arc B370, not the six-core Rocket Lake chip.

FAQ

Q: Can the Intel Core i5-11400F + Intel Arc B370 run Overpower at 60 FPS?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080 with Low settings, where the recorded average is 65 FPS. No other resolution and settings combination in the data reaches the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What frame rate does this combo get at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 the averages range from 28 FPS on Ultra to 58 FPS on Low. Medium averages 36 FPS with a minimum of 31 and a maximum of 42. None of these clear 60 FPS.

Q: Is 4K playable at all?

A: No. At 3840x2160 the best result is 49 FPS on Low, with Medium at 31 FPS (minimum 26, maximum 35), High at 28 FPS, and Ultra at 24 FPS.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck?

A: The GPU. The Arc B370 ranks in the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the Core i5-11400F ranks in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Frame rates scale steeply with both resolution and preset, indicating graphics-side limits.

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested configurations for Overpower?

A: It ranks 3427 out of 3713 tested combinations for this game, placing it among the slowest configurations in the database.

Q: Does the High preset cost much performance over Medium?

A: Very little. At 1080p the difference is 3 FPS (41 on Medium, 38 on High); at 1440p it is 2 FPS; at 4K it is 3 FPS. The expensive step is Low to Medium, not Medium to High.

Similar Performance Alternatives

On the CPU side, the recorded rival data places the i5-11400F almost exactly in the middle of a tight cluster. Its average benchmark score of 17177 is within 0.3 percent of the AMD EPYC 7H12 (17120), 0.4 percent of the Intel Core i5-12450H (17239), 0.6 percent of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (17278), and 0.6 percent of the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U (17074). Any of these processors would deliver effectively identical CPU-side throughput in Overpower, and given that this game is GPU-limited here, swapping among them would change nothing measurable in frame rate.

On the GPU side, the Arc B370's average score of 1184 is similarly bracketed. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, within 0.2 percent), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, within 0.5 percent), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192, within 0.7 percent), and the AMD FirePro M2000 (1168, within 1.4 percent) all sit within rounding distance of the same result. A machine built around any of these graphics solutions would be expected to land in the same frame-rate territory as the recorded numbers above, with Low-settings 1080p play as the realistic ceiling.

The practical takeaway from the rival data is symmetry: both components in this pairing are matched almost perfectly to their respective neighbors in the database, meaning there is no upgrade path on one side that the other side would not immediately bottleneck. Meaningful gains require replacing the graphics side.

How This Combo Ranks

The database places this configuration 3427th out of 3713 tested combinations for Overpower. That puts it in the bottom portion of the field, and the per-resolution verdicts explain why: the only playable point in the entire tested matrix is 1080p Low at 65 FPS, and even the next-closest result, 1440p Low at 58 FPS, misses the threshold. Configurations ranked above this one are those with faster graphics hardware, since the recorded data shows the game is GPU-limited across the board here. The CPU's 71st-percentile standing is largely wasted on Overpower in this pairing.

It is also notable that the CPU cluster around this chip, including parts with nearly identical average scores, would all rank similarly in this game if paired with comparable graphics, reinforcing that the ranking is driven almost entirely by the graphics side of the equation.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Overpower? Conditionally. The recorded data shows exactly one playable configuration: 1920x1080 at Low settings, averaging 65 FPS. That clears the 60 FPS threshold, but with little margin, and heavier scenes that pull the average down would put it at risk.

At 2560x1440 there are no playable settings. The best result, Low at 58 FPS, falls short, and Medium drops to 36 FPS. At 3840x2160 the situation is worse: even Low manages only 49 FPS, and Ultra sits at 24 FPS. The verdict table records no playable settings at either of these resolutions.

For an action game, frame-rate consistency matters, and the Medium-preset minimums recorded at each resolution (34 FPS at 1080p, 31 at 1440p, 26 at 4K) indicate substantial dips below the averages. The realistic summary: this combination runs Overpower at reduced settings at 1080p only, and nothing more.

Best Settings per Resolution

• 1920x1080: Low is the only preset at or above 60 FPS, at an average of 65 FPS. Medium (41 FPS), High (38 FPS), and Ultra (31 FPS) all fall below the threshold.
• 2560x1440: No preset qualifies. Low comes closest at 58 FPS, but Medium (36 FPS), High (34 FPS), and Ultra (28 FPS) are all well short.
• 3840x2160: No preset qualifies. Low averages 49 FPS, Medium 31 FPS, High 28 FPS, and Ultra 24 FPS.

In short, 1080p Low is the single recommended setting for this hardware. Players wanting higher settings or higher resolutions need a faster graphics solution; the Core i5-11400F itself has the benchmark headroom to support one.