Overpower

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this combination covers three resolutions and four quality presets. Across every configuration tested, the system delivered average frame rates well above the 60 FPS playability threshold, with the lowest recorded average being 75.6 FPS at 4K Ultra. No minimum or maximum frame rate values were captured in the database, so the analysis relies entirely on average FPS measurements.

At 1920x1080, the frame rates scale predictably with preset weight. Low settings produce an average of 170.1 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this combo at any resolution. Medium settings drop that average to 129.8 FPS, a 23.7% reduction from Low. High settings yield 121.4 FPS, while Ultra remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold at 99.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 70.7 FPS, meaning the most demanding preset still retains roughly 58% of the performance available at the least demanding preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings average 163.6 FPS, only 6.5 FPS below the 1080p Low result. Medium produces 117.2 FPS, High reaches 108.1 FPS, and Ultra settles at 89.6 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 74.0 FPS, which is slightly larger than the 1080p spread, indicating that the higher resolution amplifies the cost of the heavier presets. Even at Ultra, the system maintains an average comfortably above 60 FPS, with 29.6 FPS of headroom.

At 3840x2160, the performance envelope narrows considerably. Low settings average 153.8 FPS, Medium drops to 100.9 FPS, High comes in at 92.2 FPS, and Ultra falls to 75.6 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 78.2 FPS, the largest of any resolution tested. The Ultra preset remains playable, but the headroom over the 60 FPS line shrinks to 15.6 FPS. This is the only resolution and preset combination where the average approaches the playability boundary, though it never crosses it.

Comparing presets across resolutions reveals a consistent pattern: Low settings lose only 16.3 FPS going from 1080p to 4K, while Ultra loses 23.8 FPS over the same range. This indicates that the heavier presets are more sensitive to resolution scaling, which is expected behavior for a GPU-bound title at high settings. The data also shows that Medium at 4K (100.9 FPS) outperforms Ultra at 1080p (99.4 FPS) by a slim margin, which is a useful reference point for users deciding between resolution and quality.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database records playable settings for every resolution tested, and all four presets at every resolution clear the 60 FPS threshold. The best settings designation refers to the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS average.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra with an average of 99.4 FPS. This leaves 39.4 FPS of headroom above the playability threshold, so users can enable the full visual feature set without concern. The frame rate is high enough that even demanding scenes with heavy particle effects or large crowds should remain fluid, though the lack of minimum FPS data means the worst-case dips are not quantified.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best settings choice, averaging 89.6 FPS. The headroom over 60 FPS is 29.6 FPS. This is a strong result for a 1440p display, as it allows the user to run the game at maximum quality while still having a comfortable margin for transient frame rate drops. The difference between 1440p Ultra and 1080p Ultra is 9.8 FPS, so the visual upgrade to a higher resolution costs less than 10% of the 1080p Ultra frame rate.

At 3840x2160, Ultra remains the best settings option with an average of 75.6 FPS. This is the tightest margin in the dataset, with only 15.6 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS line. It is playable, but users with 4K displays should be aware that the margin is smaller than at lower resolutions. If the game has particularly demanding scenes that were not captured in the average, there is a risk of dipping below 60 FPS in those moments. For users who prioritize a rock-solid 60 FPS over maximum visual fidelity, dropping to High at 4K would provide additional safety margin, though the database does not record minimum FPS values to confirm this.

Across all resolutions, the system never requires a reduction below Ultra to maintain playability. This is a clean sweep: every preset at every resolution is playable according to the recorded measurements.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database provides nearest rival comparisons for both the CPU and GPU independently, which helps contextualize how this specific combination behaves relative to other hardware.

For the Intel Core i5-10400F, the nearest rival by average benchmark score is the Intel Xeon 6756E, which scores 14163 compared to the i5-10400F's 14185, a delta of 0.2%. This means the two processors are effectively interchangeable in synthetic workloads. The AMD EPYC 7552 is also close, scoring 14115, a 0.5% delta. On the other side, the Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232, which is 0.3% higher than the i5-10400F, and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C scores 14277, 0.6% higher. All four rivals fall within a 1.2% band around the i5-10400F's average score, so any of these processors would produce nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Overpower. The practical takeaway is that the i5-10400F sits in a dense cluster of similarly performing CPUs, and swapping to any of these rivals would not meaningfully change frame rates.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with a score of 37628 against 37648, a 0.1% delta. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, a 0.4% delta, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, a 1.3% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the only rival that scores higher, at 38135, which is 1.3% above the RTX 4070. All of these rivals are within a 2.6% band, so in practice they would deliver nearly identical GPU-bound performance. The RTX 4080 Mobile would be a marginal upgrade, while the Tesla P4 and RX Vega 56 would be essentially indistinguishable from the RTX 4070 in this game.

Because the measured FPS data comes from the specific i5-10400F and RTX 4070 combination, users with any of the listed rival components can expect similar results. The deltas are all small enough that the verdict for Overpower would not change: every rival combination would still clear 60 FPS at all resolutions and presets, assuming no other system bottlenecks exist.

The Verdict

The question posed is whether this PC can run Overpower. The recorded data answers clearly: yes, at every resolution and preset tested.

At 1920x1080, the system averages 99.4 FPS on Ultra, 121.4 FPS on High, 129.8 FPS on Medium, and 170.1 FPS on Low. All four presets exceed the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin. The worst case in the dataset, 1080p Ultra, still has 39.4 FPS of headroom.

At 2560x1440, the system averages 89.6 FPS on Ultra, 108.1 FPS on High, 117.2 FPS on Medium, and 163.6 FPS on Low. Again, all presets clear 60 FPS. The Ultra preset has 29.6 FPS of headroom, which is sufficient for most gaming scenarios.

At 3840x2160, the system averages 75.6 FPS on Ultra, 92.2 FPS on High, 100.9 FPS on Medium, and 153.8 FPS on Low. The Ultra preset is the only configuration in the entire dataset where the average dips below 80 FPS, but it still clears the 60 FPS threshold with 15.6 FPS to spare.

The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 all support playable settings across the full range of presets. The best settings at each resolution are Ultra, with averages of 99.4, 89.6, and 75.6 FPS respectively. No resolution requires a compromise to lower presets to achieve playability.

The only caveat worth noting is the absence of minimum FPS data. The averages suggest a comfortable margin, but users who are sensitive to frame time spikes or who play scenes with intense effects should be aware that the 4K Ultra margin is the thinnest point in the dataset. For the vast majority of gameplay, however, this combination delivers a smooth experience at maximum quality.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals how the CPU and GPU split their workload across resolutions and presets. The pattern is consistent with a GPU-bound game at high settings, but the resolution scaling tells a more nuanced story.

At 1080p, the frame rates are high across all presets, ranging from 99.4 FPS at Ultra to 170.1 FPS at Low. The large spread between presets indicates that GPU load is the primary factor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would cluster closer together regardless of preset, because the CPU would be unable to feed the GPU faster regardless of visual quality. Instead, the 70.7 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p shows that the GPU is doing most of the work.

At 1440p, the same pattern appears with a slightly larger spread of 74.0 FPS between Low and Ultra. The increase in spread from 1080p to 1440p indicates that the GPU is working harder at the higher resolution, which further confirms its dominant role. The CPU is not the limiting factor here.

At 4K, the spread grows to 78.2 FPS, and the overall frame rates drop noticeably. Low settings at 4K (153.8 FPS) are lower than Low at 1080p (170.1 FPS), and Ultra at 4K (75.6 FPS) is much lower than Ultra at 1080p (99.4 FPS). This resolution sensitivity is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario: as pixel count increases, the GPU must do more work per frame, and frame rates fall accordingly.

The CPU's role becomes relatively less important as resolution increases. At 1080p, the i5-10400F must feed the GPU fast enough to reach 170 FPS at Low settings, which is a real demand on the processor. At 4K, even the fastest GPU would struggle to exceed the frame rates shown here, so the CPU has more headroom. The data does not include a direct CPU-only test for Overpower, but the resolution scaling pattern strongly suggests that the GPU is the dominant factor at all three resolutions.

For users who want to push higher frame rates, the upgrade path is clear: the GPU is the component that matters most. The i5-10400F is sufficient to keep up with the RTX 4070 at every resolution tested. A faster CPU would not meaningfully improve the Ultra preset results at 4K, where the GPU is clearly the constraint. At 1080p Low, a faster CPU might help push frame rates beyond 170 FPS, but that scenario is unlikely to be a priority for most users.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific combination of Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 at position 1104 out of 3713 tested combinations for Overpower. This places the combo in the top 29.7% of all tested systems.

Given that the combination clears 60 FPS at every resolution and preset, the rank reflects how many other systems achieve even higher frame rates, not whether this one is playable. The top 29.7% placement means that roughly 70% of tested combinations perform at or below this level, which is a solid result for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU.

The rank also makes sense relative to the component percentiles. The i5-10400F sits at the 68th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 68% of tested processors. The RTX 4070 sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, outperforming 81% of tested graphics cards. The combination rank of 1104 out of 3713 is broadly consistent with these individual component placements, though the game-specific ranking can deviate from synthetic benchmark percentiles depending on how Overpower uses the hardware.

The nearest rival scores for both components suggest that small changes in hardware would not dramatically shift the ranking. The CPU rivals all fall within 0.6% of the i5-10400F's average score, and the GPU rivals fall within 1.3% of the RTX 4070's average score. Swapping to any of these nearby components would likely move the combo rank by only a few positions, if at all.

The practical interpretation is that this system is a strong performer for Overpower, comfortably in the upper third of all tested combinations, with enough headroom at every resolution to run the game at maximum quality. The rank is not a concern for playability; it simply indicates that faster systems exist, which is always true in any benchmark database. For the vast majority of users, the 1104th position out of 3713 is more than sufficient to enjoy Overpower at high frame rates with all visual features enabled.