Overpower

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Overpower at 4K with maximum settings?

A: Yes. The recorded data shows 75.8 FPS average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. It is the lowest average among the tested presets at that resolution, but it remains comfortably playable.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combination?

A: 1920x1080 offers the highest headroom, with an Ultra preset average of 98 FPS and a Low preset average of 170.9 FPS. If you want maximum visual quality with high frame rates, 2560x1440 Ultra at 87.8 FPS average is a strong middle ground.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14185, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6756E, scores 14163, which is only 0.2 percent lower. The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C scores 14277, about 0.6 percent higher, so the differences are tiny.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23172, also in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, which is 0.4 percent higher, while the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 0.3 percent lower. The practical performance gap is negligible.

Q: Is there a settings preset that should be avoided?

A: No preset fails the 60 FPS threshold at any resolution. The lowest recorded average is 75.8 FPS at 4K Ultra. Even the most demanding configuration clears the playable mark with margin.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU matter more for this game?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary driver. At 1080p Low, the CPU may provide more headroom, but the frame rate scaling from Low to Ultra at each resolution shows the GPU workload dominating. For example, at 1080p, Ultra drops to 98 FPS from 170.9 FPS at Low, a 72.9 FPS swing that reflects GPU-bound rendering.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded measurements show a clear pattern: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is the component that determines playability in Overpower. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 170.9 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 98 FPS. That is a 72.9 FPS difference, or roughly 43 percent lower performance, driven almost entirely by increased GPU shading, texture, and memory pressure. The Intel Core i5-10400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, is never the bottleneck in these results; even at the lowest settings, the game produces frame rates well above what a CPU-limited scenario would show.

As resolution increases, the GPU role becomes even more pronounced. At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 164 FPS, and Ultra averages 87.8 FPS. At 3840x2160, Low averages 155.8 FPS, while Ultra averages 75.8 FPS. The relative drop from Low to Ultra is consistent across resolutions, but the absolute frame rates decline as pixel count rises. This is classic GPU-bound scaling. The CPU's single-thread and multi-thread scores from the database, such as a Geekbench single-core score of 1420 and a multi-core score of 6257, indicate it can feed the RTX 3080 adequately at these settings, but the GPU's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are what handle the increasing load.

For practical advice: if you play at 4K, the GPU is doing nearly all the heavy lifting. If you play at 1080p with Low settings, the CPU may start to matter more, but even then, the data shows no CPU-induced frame cap. The RTX 3080's 68th percentile standing among all GPUs and the i5-10400F's 68th percentile among CPUs mean neither component is exceptionally weak, but the GPU's raw throughput, especially at higher resolutions, is the deciding factor.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database records average FPS only, with no minimum or maximum values captured. The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and every configuration tested clears it.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 170.9 FPS. Medium averages 129.4 FPS. High averages 116 FPS. Ultra averages 98 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 72.9 FPS. All presets are far above 60 FPS, so even Ultra leaves substantial headroom for future patches or background tasks.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 164 FPS. Medium averages 114.3 FPS. High averages 106.2 FPS. Ultra averages 87.8 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 76.2 FPS. This resolution still offers excellent performance, with Ultra nearly 28 FPS above the threshold.

At 3840x2160, Low averages 155.8 FPS. Medium averages 98.1 FPS. High averages 91.6 FPS. Ultra averages 75.8 FPS. The difference from Low to Ultra is 80 FPS. Even the most demanding setting delivers 15.8 FPS of margin above the playable line.

The scaling between resolutions is smooth. At Low settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p costs only 6.9 FPS, and from 1080p to 4K costs 15.1 FPS. At Ultra settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p costs 10.2 FPS, and from 1080p to 4K costs 22.2 FPS. This indicates the GPU has enough memory bandwidth and compute for 4K, but Ultra at 4K is the most demanding configuration in the dataset.

For a practical frame rate target, consider this: at 1080p Ultra, you get 98 FPS, which suits high refresh displays. At 1440p Ultra, 87.8 FPS is still smooth. At 4K Ultra, 75.8 FPS is playable but not ideal for competitive play. If you prefer maximum frame rates, the Low preset at any resolution exceeds 155 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals in the database, the Intel Core i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14185. The Intel Xeon 6756E scores 14163, which is 0.2 percent lower. The AMD EPYC 7552 scores 14115, 0.5 percent lower. The Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232, 0.3 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C scores 14277, 0.6 percent higher. Any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Overpower. In practice, the differences are within noise, so if you have a motherboard that supports a different socket, these chips would behave similarly in this game.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 averages 23172. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 0.3 percent higher. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, 0.3 percent higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, 0.4 percent higher. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276, 0.4 percent higher. These are all within 0.4 percent of the RTX 3080's average score, so in Overpower, the frame rates would be essentially identical. The RTX 3080's specific strengths, such as its 8704 shading units and 68 RT cores, do not appear to give it a measurable edge over these rivals in this game's measured data.

If you are building a system and cannot find an RTX 3080, any of these GPU alternatives would produce nearly the same FPS at the same settings and resolution. The same applies to the CPU side: the i5-10400F's performance is interchangeable with its listed rivals for this workload.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Overpower. The verdict data is unambiguous: at every resolution tested, all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 75.8. That is the lowest recorded value in the entire dataset, yet it still provides a 15.8 FPS buffer above the playable line. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 87.8 FPS, giving you 27.8 FPS of headroom. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 98 FPS, which is 38 FPS above the threshold.

If you own a 4K display, you can run the game at maximum quality without worry. If you have a 1440p 144Hz monitor, you will not hit 144 FPS at Ultra, but you will at Medium (114.3 FPS) and nearly at High (106.2 FPS). At 1080p, even Ultra exceeds 90 FPS, and Low approaches 171 FPS, which is ideal for high refresh rate monitors.

The only caveat is that no minimum or maximum FPS data was recorded, so stutter or frame time spikes cannot be assessed. However, the average frame rates are high enough that even a 20 percent drop would still leave most configurations above 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all tested CPU and GPU combinations in the database, this pairing ranks 1146 out of 3713 combos for Overpower. That places it in the upper third of all systems tested, roughly the 69th percentile. This is a strong result, but not a top-tier one. The rank reflects that the RTX 3080 is a high-end GPU from the previous generation, while the i5-10400F is a mid-range CPU. The combo outperforms many systems with weaker GPUs, but it does not compete with modern flagship CPUs paired with top GPUs.

The rank makes sense given the component percentiles: both the CPU and GPU sit at the 68th percentile of their respective categories. The combo's game-specific rank is slightly better than that, 69th percentile, which suggests Overpower is not unusually CPU or GPU demanding. The game scales well with the available hardware, and this pairing delivers a balanced experience.

For context, the nearest CPU rivals (Xeon 6756E, Core 7 160UL, EPYC 7552, Ryzen 3 7320C) and GPU rivals (P106-100, Radeon Pro Vega 16, RX 6600M, R9 M290X) would all produce similar frame rates. If you are considering an upgrade path, the data indicates that changing either component to one of these nearby alternatives would yield no meaningful difference in Overpower. To move significantly up the rank list, you would need a stronger GPU, as the game is primarily GPU-bound at higher resolutions.