Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Overpower
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 46 | 58 | 57 | 94 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 66 | 68 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 60 | 73 | 76 | 125 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Overpower on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a playable experience in Overpower, but the margin for error varies sharply by resolution. At 1080p, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, while 1440p requires dropping from Ultra, and 4K is only viable at Low settings. The data indicates a GPU-bound pairing at higher resolutions, with the Ryzen 9’s 16-core/32-thread configuration providing ample headroom.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates reveal a consistent pattern: Overpower scales predictably with resolution and preset, but the gap between Low and Ultra is substantial. At 1920x1080, the system starts at 125.1 FPS average on Low, drops to 75.5 FPS on Medium, then settles at 72.6 FPS on High, and finally hits 60.4 FPS on Ultra. The delta between Low and Ultra is 64.7 FPS, which represents a 51.7% reduction in average frame rate. Notably, the step from Medium to High costs only 2.9 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 12.2 FPS — indicating that the Ultra preset introduces disproportionately heavy effects.
Moving to 2560x1440, the same preset ladder shows tighter grouping at the top. Low delivers 110.1 FPS average, Medium drops to 68.0 FPS, High sits at 65.8 FPS, and Ultra falls to 55.7 FPS. The difference between Medium and High is just 2.2 FPS, suggesting that the High preset adds minimal visual overhead over Medium at this resolution. The critical threshold is crossed between High and Ultra, where the 10.1 FPS drop pushes the average below 60 FPS. At 1440p, the system can maintain 60+ FPS on three of four presets, with Ultra being the sole exception.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low yields 94.1 FPS average, which is impressively high for 4K, but Medium drops to 57.3 FPS, High to 57.6 FPS, and Ultra to 45.5 FPS. The oddity here is that Medium and High produce nearly identical averages (57.3 vs 57.6), differing by only 0.3 FPS, while Ultra falls another 12.1 FPS behind. This suggests that the 4K resolution is primarily limited by pixel throughput rather than shading complexity — the GPU’s 213.6 GPixel/s pixel rate becomes the bottleneck. The data shows no min or max FPS values recorded for any configuration, so the analysis relies solely on averages.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU nearest rivals provide context for how this combo compares to other hardware pairings. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51,947. Its closest competitors are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (avg score 52,073, delta -0.2%), AMD EPYC 8124P (52,121, delta -0.3%), Intel Core i9-13900F (51,730, delta +0.4%), and Intel Core i7-14700 (52,301, delta -0.7%). The deltas are all within 1%, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Overpower — the Ryzen 9’s 16 cores and 32 threads are not uniquely advantageous here, as the game’s scaling appears to plateau well before saturating the processor.
For the Intel Arc B580, the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 23,021. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23,061, delta -0.2%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22,895, delta +0.6%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23,172, delta -0.7%), and NVIDIA P106-100 (23,249, delta -1%). The RTX 3080 being within 0.7% is notable — it suggests that in Overpower, the Arc B580’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are competitive with a much older high-end card. Swapping the Arc B580 for any of these rivals would yield statistically indistinguishable FPS in this title.
When considering a full system swap, a user moving from the Ryzen 9 5950X to an Intel Core i7-14700 or from the Arc B580 to an RTX 2080 would see virtually no change in Overpower performance. The combination’s bottleneck is not the CPU or GPU individually, but rather their interaction at specific resolutions — a fact reinforced by the 4K results where the GPU’s pixel rate becomes the limiting factor.
How This Combo Ranks
Out of 3,713 tested combinations in Overpower, this pairing ranks 2,817th. That places it in the 24th percentile of all combos — meaning roughly 76% of tested systems perform better. The rank is heavily influenced by the GPU’s modest standing (68th percentile among all GPUs) dragging down the CPU’s strong position (91st percentile). The data shows that the Arc B580 is the performance ceiling; the Ryzen 9 5950X has substantial untapped headroom. In practical terms, this combo sits in the lower-middle tier of systems tested, which aligns with the 4K results showing only Low settings can sustain 60+ FPS. The rank of 2,817 is not a verdict on playability — it simply reflects that many other CPUs and GPUs achieve higher average frame rates across the full resolution and preset matrix.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Overpower at 4K with High settings?*
A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 57.6, which falls short of the 60 FPS playable threshold. The only playable setting at 4K is Low, which delivers 94.1 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset at 1440p that stays above 60 FPS?
A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 65.8 FPS, which is the highest preset that clears the threshold. Ultra drops to 55.7 FPS and is not playable.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of benchmark scores?
A: The Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51,947 on average. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, scores 52,073, a delta of -0.2%. The Intel Core i9-13900F is 0.4% behind, and the Intel Core i7-14700 is 0.7% ahead. All four CPUs are within 1% of each other.
Q: Is the GPU or CPU more likely to limit performance at 1080p Ultra?
A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the system hits 60.4 FPS — just above the threshold. Given that the CPU ranks in the 91st percentile and the GPU in the 68th percentile, the Arc B580 is the limiting factor. The CPU has significant headroom, as evidenced by its 16-core/32-thread configuration.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: The difference is 64.7 FPS: Low averages 125.1 FPS, while Ultra averages 60.4 FPS. This represents a 51.7% reduction in average frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest preset.
Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K Medium?
A: No. At 3840x2160 Medium, the average FPS is 57.3, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Low is the only playable setting at this resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 9 5950X and the Arc B580. At 1080p, the CPU’s influence is minimal — the frame rate differences between presets are driven entirely by GPU workload. The 16-core processor with 32 threads and 64 MB of L3 cache can easily feed the GPU at 125.1 FPS on Low, and even at Ultra’s 60.4 FPS, the CPU is not the bottleneck. The fact that the system loses 64.7 FPS from Low to Ultra at 1080p, while the CPU’s single-thread score (944 in 3DMark) remains constant, confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor.
At 1440p, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced. The drop from 110.1 FPS (Low) to 65.8 FPS (High) shows that the Arc B580’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is being taxed more heavily. The 2.2 FPS difference between Medium and High suggests that the High preset adds geometry and texture complexity that the GPU can still handle, but the 10.1 FPS drop to Ultra indicates a shader-heavy effect that exceeds the GPU’s capacity. The CPU remains idle — the Ryzen 9’s multi-thread score of 11,597 in 3DMark max threads is far from being saturated.
At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the dominant factor. The pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s becomes the hard ceiling, as evidenced by the near-identical scores at Medium (57.3 FPS) and High (57.6 FPS) — both are limited by pixel fill, not shader complexity. The 94.1 FPS at Low suggests that when pixel shading is minimal, the GPU can still produce high frame rates, but any increase in per-pixel work immediately drops performance below 60 FPS. The CPU’s role at 4K is negligible; even a slower processor would deliver the same results, as the bottleneck is entirely in the GPU’s rasterization pipeline.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the only preset that maintains 60+ FPS is Low, which delivers 94.1 FPS average. Medium (57.3) and High (57.6) both fall short, and Ultra (45.5) is the worst performer. Users at 4K must accept Low settings to maintain smooth gameplay, though the 94.1 FPS figure provides comfortable headroom above the threshold.
At 2560x1440, High settings are the optimal choice, delivering 65.8 FPS average. This is just 5.8 FPS above the threshold, but it is the highest preset that remains playable. Medium (68.0) is slightly faster, but High offers better visual quality for a mere 2.2 FPS penalty. Ultra (55.7) is not playable.
For 1920x1080, Ultra settings are viable at 60.4 FPS average, making this the recommended configuration. The system clears the threshold by just 0.4 FPS, so there is minimal margin, but the data confirms it is playable. Users seeking more stability can drop to High (72.6 FPS) or Medium (75.5 FPS), but Ultra is the highest preset that meets the 60 FPS requirement.
The Verdict
This PC can run Overpower at all three tested resolutions, but only with specific settings. At 1920x1080, the system is fully playable across all presets, with Ultra achieving 60.4 FPS average — just above the threshold. At 2560x1440, the playable settings are High, Medium, and Low, with High being the best visual option at 65.8 FPS; Ultra falls below 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, delivering 94.1 FPS, while Medium (57.3), High (57.6), and Ultra (45.5) all fail the 60 FPS requirement.
The overall picture is a system that excels at 1080p, handles 1440p with a settings compromise, and struggles at 4K beyond Low. The Ryzen 9 5950X is not the limiting factor at any resolution — its 91st percentile ranking among CPUs ensures it can keep pace. The Arc B580, ranked in the 68th percentile among GPUs, defines the system’s ceiling. For a 4K experience, users must drastically reduce visual quality; for 1080p, the system offers headroom on every preset. The combo ranks 2,817th out of 3,713 tested, which aligns with its mid-pack GPU performance and top-tier CPU. Ultimately, this is a 1080p/1440p gaming machine — 4K is playable only at the lowest settings.