Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Overpower
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 49 | 52 | 84 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 57 | 62 | 98 |
| 1080p Full HD | 53 | 64 | 69 | 110 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Overpower on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Arc B570 combination presents a compelling mid-range pairing for Overpower, an action title released on August 14, 2023. Measured performance data shows this system delivers playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p with specific settings, while 4K remains a challenge. The Ryzen 5 7500F, a Zen 4 Raphael desktop chip with 6 cores and 12 threads, boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Arc B570, based on the Xe2-HPG Battlemage architecture, offers 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus. Together they land at combo rank 2987 out of 3713 tested configurations in this game, placing them in the 80th percentile of all recorded combos. The data reveals a system that is neither a top-tier powerhouse nor a weakling, but one that requires careful settings selection to hit the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the resolution where this combo is most comfortable, the measured average frame rates range from 110 FPS at Low settings down to 53 FPS at Ultra. The Low preset delivers an average of 110 FPS, which is nearly double the 60 FPS playable target, indicating substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 and a maximum of 79, showing that even at this mid-tier setting the system stays above the threshold in average terms but can dip just below it during intense scenes. High settings produce an average of 64 FPS, with no min or max values recorded, which suggests consistent performance but with less margin than Medium. Ultra is the only preset at 1080p that falls below the playable threshold, averaging 53 FPS, a 23% reduction from High and a 52% drop from Low, indicating a sharp scaling curve as graphical features increase.
At 2560x1440, the performance picture changes notably. Low settings still deliver a strong 98 FPS average, which is 11% lower than the 1080p Low result but remains highly playable. Medium settings average 62 FPS with a minimum of 52 and a maximum of 71, meaning the average just clears the 60 FPS threshold, but the minimum shows that frame dips are frequent enough to cause occasional stutter on demanding scenes. High settings at 1440p average 57 FPS, which is 7 FPS below the playable threshold, and Ultra drops further to 47 FPS. The gap between Medium and High at this resolution is only 5 FPS, suggesting that the extra visual features at High cost more than the performance gain would justify, and the gap between High and Ultra is 10 FPS, showing diminishing returns as settings climb. Compared to 1080p, the 1440p Medium average is 10% lower, while the Low preset is 12% lower, indicating that resolution scaling is relatively mild for this hardware at lower presets.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playability across most settings. Low is the only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 84 FPS, which is 14% lower than the 1440p Low result and 24% lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium averages 52 FPS with a minimum of 44 and a maximum of 60, showing that even the average is 8 FPS below the playable mark and the maximum barely touches the threshold. High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 40 FPS, the lowest recorded figure in the entire measured dataset. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K represents a 52% performance drop, from 84 FPS to 40 FPS, which is more severe than the 52% drop at 1080p but from a much lower starting point. The data shows that 4K is only viable at Low settings, and even then the 84 FPS average leaves little room for future patches or more demanding scenes. The min and max values are only recorded for Medium at each resolution, so the frame time consistency for Low, High, and Ultra presets remains unknown from the available data.
FAQ
*Q: Can this CPU and GPU combination run Overpower at 1080p with High settings?*
A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 64 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This makes High the most demanding preset that clears the threshold at this resolution, according to the verdictByResolution data.
Q: What is the best preset to use at 1440p to stay above 60 FPS?
A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 62 FPS, which is the highest preset that maintains playability. High settings drop to 57 FPS, which falls below the threshold, so Medium is the recommended choice for 1440p gaming.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?
A: Only at Low settings, where the average FPS is 84. Medium settings at 3840x2160 average 52 FPS, High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 40 FPS, all below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdictByResolution data lists Low as the only playable setting at 4K.
*Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested configurations in Overpower?*
A: The combo ranks 2987 out of 3713 tested combos, placing it in the lower 20% of all recorded systems. This indicates that while it can run the game at lower resolutions and settings, many other hardware combinations deliver higher performance.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, Low settings average 110 FPS while Ultra averages 53 FPS, a difference of 57 FPS or approximately 52% lower performance. This shows a steep performance cost for enabling the highest visual quality.
Q: Does the GPU or CPU have more impact on performance in this game?
A: The data shows that the Arc B570's performance is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the CPU can push 110 FPS, but at 4K Low the GPU drops to 84 FPS, indicating that resolution scaling is driven by GPU load. The CPU's 3DMark max threads score of 6379 and single thread score of 974 suggest it has enough headroom for this game's demands.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 2987 out of 3713 tested configurations places this system in the 19.5th percentile of all tested combos for Overpower. This means that roughly 80% of tested systems outperform it, which is a sobering statistic for a mid-range pairing. However, the percentile ranking of the individual components tells a more nuanced story. The Ryzen 5 7500F has a percentileVsAllCpus of 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all CPUs in the database, while the Arc B570 has a percentileVsAllGpus of 65, outperforming 65% of all GPUs. The disparity between the CPU's high ranking and the GPU's lower ranking suggests that the graphics card is the primary bottleneck in this configuration, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load increases.
The rank of 2987 indicates that while the CPU is above average, the GPU's mid-tier position drags the overall system performance down. This is consistent with the measured FPS data, where the system excels at 1080p Low (110 FPS) but falls below 60 FPS at 1440p High and 4K Medium. The gap between the CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 65th percentile is significant, implying that upgrading the GPU would yield more performance gains than upgrading the CPU. The data also shows that the combo rank is not simply the average of the two component percentiles; the 19.5th percentile of combos suggests that many other pairings of similar or lower component quality achieve better results in this specific game, possibly due to driver optimization or game-specific engine characteristics.
Compared to other combos in the database, this system sits near the bottom quartile, which is surprising given the CPU's strong benchmark scores. The Ryzen 5 7500F's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799 and singlecore score of 3218 are respectable, but the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 are not exceptional. The combination of a high-performing CPU with a mid-tier GPU creates a system that is CPU-bound at low resolutions but GPU-bound at high resolutions, which is reflected in the FPS scaling across resolution presets. The rank data suggests that for Overpower, the GPU choice matters more than the CPU, as the game appears to scale significantly with GPU load.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide insight into what other hardware would behave similarly in this configuration. For the Ryzen 5 7500F, the closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-11850H, with an average benchmark score of 24935 and a deltaPct of 0.1%, meaning it performs nearly identically. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has an avgScore of 25005 and a deltaPct of -0.2%, making it marginally slower, while the Intel Core i7-13620H (avgScore 24911, deltaPct 0.2%) and Intel Core 5 210H (avgScore 24872, deltaPct 0.4%) are also within a fraction of a percent. These rivals would offer essentially the same CPU performance in Overpower, meaning any differences in FPS would come from the GPU or other system factors.
For the Intel Arc B570, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, with an avgScore of 20534 and a deltaPct of 0.1%, indicating near-identical performance. The Intel Arc A750 is the closest desktop competitor, with an avgScore of 20582 and a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning it is marginally slower. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (avgScore 20480, deltaPct 0.4%) and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (avgScore 20662, deltaPct -0.5%) are also in the same performance band, though the Quadro and Radeon are older mobile parts that may lack modern driver support. If a user swapped the Arc B570 for an RTX 3070 Mobile, the FPS in Overpower would be nearly unchanged, with less than a 1% difference in average benchmark scores. Similarly, choosing an Arc A750 would yield a negligible performance decrease.
These rival combinations suggest that a system with an Intel Core i7-11850H and an RTX 3070 Mobile would produce almost identical results to the Ryzen 5 7500F and Arc B570. The deltaPct values are all under 1%, so the measured FPS at each resolution and preset would likely be within 1-2 FPS of the figures reported here. For users considering alternative hardware, the data indicates that the Arc B570's closest rival, the RTX 3070 Mobile, would not provide a meaningful upgrade for Overpower, and the CPU alternatives would also not change the bottleneck characteristics. The only way to significantly improve performance would be to move to a higher-tier GPU, such as one with a higher percentileVsAllGpus, which is not listed in the nearestRivals data.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 is High, which delivers 64 FPS on average. This is the recommended setting for 1080p gaming, as it provides a balance between visual quality and performance. Medium settings offer a higher average of 69 FPS with a minimum of 59, but the High preset's 64 FPS average is still above the threshold, and the visual improvement likely justifies the 5 FPS loss. Low settings produce 110 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play but sacrifices graphical fidelity. Ultra is not recommended at this resolution, as the 53 FPS average falls below the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the most demanding playable preset is Medium, which averages 62 FPS with a minimum of 52 and a maximum of 71. This is the only preset above Low that clears the 60 FPS average threshold, though the minimum FPS suggests occasional dips below 60. Low settings deliver a strong 98 FPS average, making them the best choice for smooth gameplay, while High averages 57 FPS and Ultra averages 47 FPS, both below the playable mark. The verdictByResolution data lists Medium as the best settings at 1440p, with an average FPS of 62, confirming that this is the highest preset that should be used.
At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which averages 84 FPS. Medium averages 52 FPS, High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 40 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold. The verdictByResolution data confirms that Low is the best setting at 4K, with an average FPS of 84. This means that 4K gaming is possible only with reduced visual quality, and users seeking higher fidelity would need to upgrade the GPU. The data shows a clear trend: as resolution increases, the preset ceiling drops, and at 4K, only the lowest preset is viable.
The Verdict
This PC can run Overpower, but the playable settings depend heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at Low, Medium, and High settings, with High being the most demanding playable preset at 64 FPS average. Ultra is not playable, averaging 53 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system can run Low and Medium settings, with Medium averaging 62 FPS and being the best playable option. High and Ultra are below the threshold at 57 FPS and 47 FPS, respectively. At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, averaging 84 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS. The verdictByResolution data confirms these findings, listing Low as the only playable setting at 4K, Medium as the best at 1440p, and High as the best at 1080p.
The system is a capable 1080p gaming machine that can handle high settings, a decent 1440p machine that requires medium settings, and a 4K machine that is restricted to low settings. For users with a 1080p monitor, this combo offers a smooth experience with high visual quality. For 1440p, it is playable but requires compromises. For 4K, it is playable only at the lowest settings, which may not be acceptable to all users. The data suggests that this system is best suited for 1080p gaming, with 1440p being a viable secondary option at medium settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals that the GPU plays a more significant role in Overpower performance than the CPU, particularly at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 110 FPS, which is likely CPU-bound in some scenes, given the Ryzen 5 7500F's strong single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark and 3218 in Cinebench R23. However, as resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU load becomes the dominant factor. The Arc B570's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 and Passmark G3D score of 14195 are modest, and the FPS drops accordingly: from 110 FPS at 1080p Low to 98 FPS at 1440p Low (an 11% drop) and 84 FPS at 4K Low (a 24% drop from 1080p Low). This scaling pattern aligns with GPU-bound behavior, where the rendering workload increases with pixel count.
The CPU's role is more apparent at low resolutions and low settings, where the system can push high frame rates. At 1080p Low, the 110 FPS average suggests that the CPU can feed the GPU enough data to reach that level, but at higher presets like Ultra, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, dropping to 53 FPS. The 3DMark 16 threads score of 6376 and max threads score of 6379 indicate that the CPU has ample multi-threaded performance for this game, which is an action title that likely uses multiple cores. The Passmark multithread score of 26825 reinforces this, showing that the CPU is not a limiting factor in most scenarios.
At 1440p, the GPU's influence grows. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 62 FPS, down from 69 FPS at 1080p Medium, a 10% drop. The Low preset at 1440p averages 98 FPS, down 11% from 1080p Low. These percentages are consistent with GPU-bound scaling, where the increase in pixel count directly reduces frame rate. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the primary determinant: Medium averages 52 FPS, a 25% drop from 1440p Medium, and Low averages 84 FPS, a 14% drop from 1440p Low. The CPU's performance remains constant across resolutions, but the GPU's load increases, making the Arc B570 the key component to upgrade for better 4K performance. The data implies that for Overpower, users should prioritize GPU upgrades over CPU upgrades, especially if gaming at 1440p or 4K, as the Ryzen 5 7500F already provides sufficient processing power to avoid CPU bottlenecks.