Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Overpower
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 49 | 52 | 84 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 57 | 62 | 98 |
| 1080p Full HD | 53 | 64 | 69 | 110 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Overpower on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a playable experience in Overpower, but the margin for error varies sharply by resolution. At 4K, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS threshold; at 1440p, Medium is the ceiling; at 1080p, High is the best playable option. The data shows a system that is capable but not overpowering, requiring settings discipline at higher pixel counts.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates reveal a clear hierarchy across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the combo starts strong with Low settings producing an average of 110 FPS. Moving up to Medium drops the average to 69 FPS, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS. High settings at 1080p yield an average of 64 FPS, while Ultra falls to 53 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 57 FPS, indicating that the most demanding preset costs nearly half the performance of the least demanding one.
At 2560x1440, the pattern repeats with lower absolute numbers. Low settings average 98 FPS, which is still well above the playable threshold. Medium settings average 62 FPS, with a minimum of 52 FPS and a maximum of 71 FPS. High settings dip to 57 FPS, and Ultra drops further to 47 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 51 FPS, showing that the resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p compresses the performance envelope by roughly 10-12% across presets.
The 3840x2160 results are the most constrained. Low settings average 84 FPS, which is the only preset at this resolution that stays above 60 FPS. Medium averages 52 FPS, with a minimum of 44 FPS and a maximum of 60 FPS. High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 40 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 4K is 44 FPS, but the critical detail is that Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold, making Low the only viable option for smooth gameplay at this resolution.
Comparing resolution scaling, the data shows that moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces Low preset performance by 12 FPS (from 110 to 98), Medium by 7 FPS (from 69 to 62), High by 7 FPS (from 64 to 57), and Ultra by 6 FPS (from 53 to 47). Moving from 1440p to 4K reduces Low by 14 FPS (from 98 to 84), Medium by 10 FPS (from 62 to 52), High by 8 FPS (from 57 to 49), and Ultra by 7 FPS (from 47 to 40). The scaling is not linear; the percentage drop from 1440p to 4K is larger for Medium (16%) than for Ultra (15%), suggesting that the GPU becomes the limiting factor more aggressively at higher settings and resolutions.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Overpower at 4K with playable frame rates?*
A: Yes, but only at Low settings, which produce an average of 84 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 52, 49, and 40 FPS respectively.
Q: What is the best preset at 1440p that stays above 60 FPS?
A: Medium settings, with an average of 62 FPS. High drops to 57 FPS, so it falls short of the playable threshold.
Q: How does the 1080p Ultra preset compare to 1440p Medium?
A: 1080p Ultra averages 53 FPS, while 1440p Medium averages 62 FPS. The higher resolution with lower settings actually delivers better performance, indicating the preset has a larger impact than resolution alone.
Q: Is there a preset at any resolution that exceeds 100 FPS?
A: Yes, 1080p Low averages 110 FPS, and 1440p Low averages 98 FPS. At 4K, even Low only reaches 84 FPS.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the data?
A: The lowest minimum is 44 FPS, observed at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. The 1440p Medium minimum is 52 FPS, and the 1080p Medium minimum is 59 FPS.
Q: Does the system ever drop below 60 FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The average is 69 FPS, but the minimum is 59 FPS, so there are moments where frame times dip below the threshold. High settings at 1080p have an average of 64 FPS with no min/max data provided.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Arc B570 is the dominant factor in Overpower performance, with the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F providing sufficient headroom. Evidence for this comes from the resolution scaling: as resolution increases from 1080p to 1440p to 4K, frame rates drop consistently across all presets. This is the classic signature of a GPU-bound workload, where the rendering load on the graphics card scales with pixel count.
At 1080p, the CPU has more room to feed frames, but the GPU still caps performance. The difference between Low (110 FPS) and Ultra (53 FPS) at 1080p is 57 FPS, which is entirely attributable to GPU rendering settings rather than CPU throughput. The Ryzen 5 7400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, does not appear to bottleneck even at the highest preset, since the frame rate scales smoothly with GPU load.
Moving to 1440p, the GPU workload increases by roughly 78% compared to 1080p (based on pixel count), but the frame rate drop is only 10-12% across presets. This suggests that the GPU has enough spare capacity to absorb the resolution increase at lower settings, but at High and Ultra, the average FPS of 57 and 47 respectively indicate that the GPU is approaching its limits. The Ryzen 5 7400F's role becomes less relevant as the GPU takes over the performance ceiling.
At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Low settings average 84 FPS, but Medium drops to 52 FPS, and Ultra to 40 FPS. The steep drop from Low to Medium (32 FPS) compared to the drop from Medium to Ultra (12 FPS) shows that the GPU's rendering pipeline is saturated at Medium and higher. The CPU is effectively idle in this scenario, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate is determined almost entirely by the graphics preset, not by any CPU-side bottleneck.
The data also shows that the combo's performance is consistent with its hardware profile. The Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 160-bit bus, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but may struggle with texture-heavy 4K scenarios. The Ryzen 5 7400F's 32 MB of L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate for feeding the GPU, but the fact that the system cannot hold 60 FPS at 4K Medium indicates that the GPU, not the CPU, is the primary constraint.
The Verdict
This PC can run Overpower, but the playable envelope is narrower than the raw specs might suggest. At 3840x2160, the verdict is clear: only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 84 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall short, at 52, 49, and 40 FPS respectively. If 4K is the target, the user must accept Low settings, which is a significant compromise for a game released in 2023.
At 2560x1440, the system is more flexible. Medium settings average 62 FPS, which clears the playable threshold, and Low averages 98 FPS for those who prefer higher frame rates. High (57 FPS) and Ultra (47 FPS) are not playable by the 60 FPS standard. The 1440p Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with a minimum of 52 FPS indicating some dips but a generally smooth experience.
At 1920x1080, the system shines. High settings average 64 FPS, which is playable, and Medium averages 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS. Low settings hit 110 FPS for competitive play, and even Ultra at 53 FPS is close to the threshold, though it does not clear it. The 1080p High preset is the sweet spot, delivering 64 FPS with presumably better visual fidelity than Medium.
The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: the system is fully playable at 1080p High, 1440p Medium, and 4K Low. Users targeting higher presets at 1440p or 4K will need to lower their expectations or reduce the resolution. The data does not support any claim of 60 FPS at 4K Medium or above, nor at 1440p High or above.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2987 out of 3713 tested combos for Overpower. This places it in the lower half of the database, specifically in the 80th percentile from the bottom (100 - (2987/3713)*100 = 19.6% from the top). The rank reflects the GPU's modest standing; the Arc B570 has a percentile rank of 65 against all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 65% of tested graphics cards, but the CPU's percentile of 83 is higher, indicating the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in this pairing.
The GPU's nearest rivals help contextualize the ranking. The Intel Arc A750 is nearly identical in performance, with a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the B570 is 0.1% slower than the A750. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.1% faster, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% faster. These are all within a tight band, suggesting that the B570's performance is comparable to mid-range GPUs from previous generations, not high-end parts.
The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T (0.1% slower), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (0.2% faster), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (0.3% slower). The Ryzen 5 7400F sits comfortably in the middle of this group, with its avgBenchmarkScore of 32750 nearly matching the 32707 of the i5-14600T. This indicates that the CPU is not the weak link in the combo; the GPU's lower percentile rank drives the overall ranking down.
The combo rank of 2987 out of 3713 means that roughly 80% of tested systems perform better in Overpower. This is a direct consequence of the Arc B570's mid-pack GPU performance, which is only slightly better than the RTX 3070 Mobile and A750. For context, the B570's passmark_g3d score of 14195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 reflect a GPU that is capable but not top-tier, and the game's performance data aligns with this.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 64 FPS. This is the recommended setting for a balance of visual quality and smoothness. Medium is also playable at 69 FPS, but High offers better fidelity without sacrificing the 60 FPS target. Ultra at 53 FPS is not recommended, as it drops below the threshold.
For 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Medium, averaging 62 FPS. This is the highest setting that clears 60 FPS. Low at 98 FPS is an option for users who prefer higher frame rates, but Medium provides a noticeable visual upgrade. High at 57 FPS and Ultra at 47 FPS are below the threshold and should be avoided if frame rate consistency is the priority.
For 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, averaging 84 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 52, 49, and 40 FPS respectively. Users at 4K must accept Low settings, which is a significant compromise but still delivers a smooth experience. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium is 44, which indicates potential stutter, so Low is the safest choice.
The data shows a clear progression: at each resolution, the recommended preset is one step below the highest available, with 1080p High being the best overall balance, 1440p Medium being the reasonable compromise, and 4K Low being the necessary fallback. The system cannot sustain 60 FPS at Ultra at any resolution, and only 1080p and 1440p can handle Medium or High. For users prioritizing frame rate over visuals, 1080p Low at 110 FPS or 1440p Low at 98 FPS are excellent choices.