Overpower

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F sits in a tightly packed performance cluster. Its average benchmark score of 36,945 places it within 0.5% of several comparable processors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36,938, a delta of 0%, making it effectively identical in raw compute. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D trails by just 0.2% with a score of 37,018, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 0.4% behind at 37,093. The Intel Core i9-12900T rounds out the group at 37,112, a 0.5% gap. In practice, any of these four CPUs would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame pacing in Overpower when paired with the same graphics card, since the processor is not the limiting factor at most settings.

The Intel Arc B370, by contrast, is an outlier in its own neighborhood. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,184 places it at the 5th percentile of all GPUs, and the nearest rivals are all older discrete parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1,186, a 0.2% edge, while the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% ahead at 1,190. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1,192, 0.7% higher, and the AMD FirePro M2000 trails by 1.4% at 1,168. The Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution with system-shared memory, so its behavior mirrors those legacy parts: playable only at the lowest settings and resolution, with severe drops as demand increases. For Overpower, anyone considering this combination should expect performance similar to a decade-old discrete GPU rather than a modern entry-level card.

Best Settings per Resolution

The recorded data shows that this combination cannot sustain 60 FPS at 4K or 1440p under any preset. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS recorded is 49 on Low settings, which falls short of the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium produces 31 FPS average, High drops to 28, and Ultra bottoms out at 24. There is no playable setting at 4K.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves slightly but still misses the mark. Low settings yield an average of 58 FPS, just 2 FPS below the threshold. Medium averages 36 FPS, High 34, and Ultra 28. No 1440p preset reaches 60 FPS, so the database records no playable settings at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, exactly one preset crosses the playable line. Low settings deliver an average of 65 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium drops to 41 FPS average, High to 38, and Ultra to 31. The best playable setting at 1080p is therefore Low, with an average of 65 FPS. The verdict data confirms this: the only playable setting across all resolutions is Low at 1920x1080, with a best average of 65 FPS. Players who demand 60 FPS must run the game at 1080p with all quality options set to their minimum.

CPU and GPU Roles

The bottleneck in this pairing is overwhelmingly the GPU. The Arc B370 is an integrated part with a 25 W TDP, system-shared memory, and only 1,280 shading units. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,184 sits at the 5th percentile of all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 5600F ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The processor has six cores, twelve threads, and a 32 MB L3 cache, which is far more compute headroom than this game needs at these frame rates.

The scaling between resolutions confirms the GPU limit. Moving from 1080p Low (65 FPS average) to 1440p Low (58 FPS) costs 7 FPS, and moving from 1440p Low to 4K Low (49 FPS) costs another 9 FPS. That is a smooth, predictable decline driven by pixel count, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. If the CPU were the constraint, the frame rate would stay flat across resolutions or drop sharply only when draw calls increased, not when resolution rose.

Preset scaling also points to the GPU. At 1080p, raising the preset from Low to Medium cuts the average from 65 to 41 FPS, a 37% loss. Going from Medium to High costs another 3 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 7 more. The same pattern repeats at 1440p and 4K. The Arc B370's fixed shading units, TMUs (40), and ROPs (20) simply cannot handle the increased shading and texture work as quality settings climb. The Ryzen 5 5600F, with a PassMark multithread score of 19,236 and single-thread score of 2,872, would comfortably feed a stronger GPU, but here it is idle much of the time waiting on the graphics pipeline.

At 4K Ultra, the average falls to 24 FPS, which is below the minimum recorded at 1440p Medium (31 FPS minimum). The GPU is exhausted. The CPU's role in this game at these settings is secondary; the data shows no scenario where the processor becomes the limiting factor. Upgrading the GPU would yield far larger gains than upgrading the CPU, though the database does not include data for alternative GPUs paired with this processor.

FAQ

Q: Can this combination run Overpower at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?

A: No. The highest average FPS recorded at 3840x2160 is 49 on Low settings. Medium averages 31, High 28, and Ultra 24. None reach the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting for this hardware?

A: The only playable setting in the recorded data is Low at 1920x1080, which averages 65 FPS. At 1440p, the best average is 58 FPS on Low, just below the threshold, and at 4K the best is 49 FPS on Low.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1,184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is 0.2% faster, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% faster, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% faster, and the AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% slower.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5600F or the Arc B370 the limiting factor in Overpower?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. The CPU ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 5th percentile. Frame rates drop steadily as resolution and preset quality increase, which indicates a GPU-bound scenario.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 1440p Medium?

A: The recorded average is 36 FPS, with a minimum of 31 and a maximum of 42. This is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Does the Arc B370 have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. Its memory is system-shared, with a memory bus width and bandwidth listed as system-dependent. This contributes to its low performance in Overpower.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the data shows no playable presets. Low settings average 49 FPS, Medium averages 31 FPS with a minimum of 26 and maximum of 35, High averages 28 FPS, and Ultra averages 24 FPS. The minimum and maximum values are only recorded for Medium at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, Low settings average 58 FPS, Medium averages 36 FPS with a minimum of 31 and maximum of 42, High averages 34 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. Again, only Medium has recorded minimum and maximum values.

At 1920x1080, Low settings average 65 FPS, which is the only playable result in the entire dataset. Medium averages 41 FPS with a minimum of 34 and maximum of 47, High averages 38 FPS, and Ultra averages 31 FPS.

The pattern is consistent: every resolution shows the largest FPS gap between Low and Medium, then smaller incremental losses as settings rise to High and Ultra. The Medium preset at each resolution is the only one with min/max data, suggesting the database captured full frame time variance only for that tier. The 1080p Low result of 65 FPS is the single point where this hardware meets the 60 FPS requirement.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 3,427 out of 3,713 tested combos in Overpower. That places it in the bottom 7.7% of all configurations in the database. The ranking reflects the GPU's severe limitation: the Arc B370's 5th percentile standing among all GPUs drags down an otherwise capable CPU, which sits in the 85th percentile.

The practical consequence is that this combo delivers playable performance only at 1080p Low, with a 65 FPS average. Most other tested combinations achieve playable frame rates at higher resolutions or higher presets. The rank of 3,427 means the vast majority of hardware pairings outperform this one in Overpower. The CPU is not the issue; its nearest rivals all score within 0.5% of it, and none of them would change the outcome when paired with this GPU. The Arc B370's nearest GPU rivals are all over a decade old, and their performance deltas of less than 1.5% confirm that the integrated Intel part is stuck in that performance tier.

For a player targeting 60 FPS, this combination is only marginally viable, and only at the lowest settings on a 1080p display. The data shows no headroom for future patches or more demanding scenes, since even the playable setting sits just 5 FPS above the threshold. Upgrading the GPU would move this combo up the rankings substantially, but with the current pairing, the rank of 3,427 out of 3,713 is the expected outcome.