Fivem

Fivem, a multiplayer modification platform built on Grand Theft Auto V, presents a unique challenge for hardware analysis due to its heavy reliance on both CPU simulation and GPU rendering. The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 produces a varied performance profile across resolutions and settings, with the data indicating a system that is exceptionally strong at 1080p and 1440p but constrained at 4K. The benchmark results reveal a clear hierarchy where the CPU provides ample headroom, leaving the GPU as the primary bottleneck for higher resolutions and visual fidelity.

The measured FPS data shows that this combo is capable of delivering smooth gameplay well above the 60 FPS threshold for most scenarios, yet the highest settings at 4K remain out of reach. The following analysis breaks down the specifics of this performance, interpreting the numbers to understand the balance between the processor, graphics card, and resolution demands.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall standing of this CPU+GPU combo among all tested configurations in Fivem?

A: The combination ranks 1993 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the upper half of all systems evaluated for this game.

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus significantly faster than its closest rival?

A: The data shows the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus has an average benchmark score of 84003, which is a mere 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's score of 83807, indicating near-identical performance between the two processors.

Q: How does the RTX 4060's benchmark score compare to its nearest competitor?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639, which is effectively tied with the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 17666, a difference of only -0.2%.

Q: What is the best settings preset to achieve at 2560x1440 resolution?

A: At 2560x1440, the system can run the Ultra preset with an average FPS of 61, which is above the playable threshold of 60 FPS, making it the best settings option that remains playable.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K with any settings preset?

A: Yes, but only with the Low preset. At 3840x2160, the Low settings achieve an average of 69 FPS, while the Medium preset drops to 54 FPS and High falls to 44 FPS, all below the playable threshold.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking compared to all other GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 sits in the 61st percentile among all GPUs, indicating it performs better than a majority of graphics cards in the benchmark database.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 is the target for each resolution. The data reveals a clear scaling pattern as resolution increases, demanding more from the GPU.

At 1920x1080, the system has substantial performance headroom. The most demanding preset, Ultra, runs at an average of 92 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold, providing a high-refresh-rate experience. The data shows a massive performance envelope, from 189 FPS at Low settings to 92 FPS at Ultra, meaning users can prioritize visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

Moving to 2560x1440, the demands on the GPU increase, but the combo still delivers playable performance at the highest settings. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 61 FPS, just clearing the 60 FPS bar. This is the best settings option that remains playable. The scaling is steep, from 124 FPS at Low to 61 FPS at Ultra, showing that the GPU is working much harder here, but the CPU still provides enough power to keep the frame rate above the target.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which produces an average of 69 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 54 FPS, and High drops to 44 FPS, both below the playable threshold. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this combo requires significant compromises in visual quality to maintain a smooth frame rate.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate a system where the CPU is rarely the bottleneck. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, with its high benchmark scores, provides ample processing power for the game's simulation and multiplayer logic. The GPU, the RTX 4060, becomes the primary determinant of performance as resolution and settings increase.

At 1920x1080, the CPU is likely the dominant factor in achieving the very high frame rates. The jump from 149 FPS at Medium to 189 FPS at Low suggests that at lower settings, the GPU is less stressed, and the CPU's ability to feed frames becomes more relevant. The Ultra preset at 92 FPS shows the GPU starting to take on more load, but the overall performance is still high.

The transition to 2560x1440 shows a significant shift. The average FPS drops across all settings, with Ultra falling to 61 FPS. This indicates the GPU is now the primary constraint, as the increased pixel count demands more from the RTX 4060. The CPU still manages to keep the frame rate from dipping below 60, but the performance ceiling is dictated by the graphics card.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's role is fully dominant. The performance drop is severe; High settings average 44 FPS, and Ultra only 34 FPS. The CPU's power is largely irrelevant here because the GPU is overwhelmed by the 4K workload. The fact that the Low preset achieves 69 FPS shows that reducing the GPU load can still yield playable results, but the CPU cannot compensate for the GPU's lack of raw fill rate at higher settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for both components provides context for what other hardware might deliver similar results in this configuration.

For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is the closest match, with a negligible 0.2% average benchmark score difference. Also nearby are the AMD EPYC 4584PX and AMD EPYC 9135, which are 1.1% and 1.2% lower in score, respectively. The AMD EPYC 7F72 is slightly ahead at 1.3% higher than the 290K. Systems using these processors would likely produce very similar frame rates in Fivem, assuming the GPU remains the same.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon HD 7790 has a benchmark score just 0.2% lower, making it the closest rival. The AMD Radeon 780M is a 0.3% difference, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 are 0.5% and 0.7% behind, respectively. While these are different classes of hardware, the benchmark scores suggest that from a pure compute perspective, they would offer comparable performance in this game, potentially leading to similar FPS at the same settings and resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1993 out of 3707 tested systems places it in the middle-to-upper tier of all configurations tested for Fivem. This is a nuanced position. It is not a top-tier performer, which is likely reserved for systems with higher-end GPUs, but it is certainly above average. The rank reflects a balance where the CPU is a high performer, sitting in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, but the GPU, while capable, is only in the 61st percentile of all GPUs.

This creates a system that is CPU-heavy, and the overall ranking is likely pulled down by the GPU's more modest standing. The data implies that for Fivem, a game that can be CPU-intensive, this combo is well-optimized for high refresh rate 1080p and good 1440p performance, but the GPU prevents it from being a top contender at 4K. The rank of 1993 suggests that while many systems are slower, a significant number also deliver higher average frame rates, likely due to more powerful graphics cards.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Fivem is answered with a qualified yes. The system is capable of running the game, but the experience varies significantly by resolution.

At 1920x1080, this combo is more than sufficient. All settings presets, including Ultra, clear the 60 FPS threshold with ease, with the Ultra preset averaging 92 FPS. This makes it an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable at all presets. The Ultra preset averages 61 FPS, which is just above the playable threshold. This is a viable setup for 1440p gaming, though users should be aware that the highest settings offer little headroom above 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on the Low preset, which averages 69 FPS. The Medium preset at 54 FPS and High at 44 FPS do not meet the playability standard. While the system can technically run the game at 4K, the visual compromises required are substantial, and it is not recommended for a fully immersive 4K experience at higher settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data presents the exact average, minimum, and maximum FPS values measured for each resolution and settings preset combination.

1920x1080

• Low: Average 189 FPS
• Medium: Average 149 FPS, Minimum 127 FPS, Maximum 171 FPS
• High: Average 119 FPS
• Ultra: Average 92 FPS

2560x1440

• Low: Average 124 FPS
• Medium: Average 98 FPS, Minimum 83 FPS, Maximum 113 FPS
• High: Average 78 FPS
• Ultra: Average 61 FPS

3840x2160

• Low: Average 69 FPS
• Medium: Average 54 FPS, Minimum 46 FPS, Maximum 63 FPS
• High: Average 44 FPS
• Ultra: Average 34 FPS

The minimum and maximum FPS data for the Medium preset at each resolution shows some variance, but the average scores are stable and representative of the overall performance. The data confirms a clear performance hierarchy, with 1080p being the most comfortable, 1440p being a balanced sweet spot, and 4K being a challenge for this hardware combination.