Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 220th out of 3,707 tested configurations for Fivem, placing it in the top 6% of all systems evaluated. This is a high-end pairing, and the measured data confirms it delivers playable performance across every resolution and preset combination tested. The RTX 4080, which sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, and the Core Ultra 7 270K, at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, combine to produce frame rates that are consistently well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with the only exception being a tie at the 4K Ultra preset.

How This Combo Ranks

With a rank of 220 out of 3,707 combos, this system is in the top 5.9% of all tested configurations for Fivem. This percentile placement indicates that the pairing is not merely capable but is positioned well above the median system, making it a strong contender for high-refresh-rate gaming at standard resolutions and for smooth 4K gameplay. The benchmark data shows a clear hierarchy: at 1080p, the system is overwhelmingly powerful, with average frame rates exceeding 200 FPS at High and Medium presets, and even reaching 333 FPS at Low. Moving to 1440p, performance remains exceptional, with the Ultra preset still hitting 107 FPS. At 4K, the system begins to show its limits, but it still manages an average of 60 FPS at Ultra, which is exactly the playable threshold. The data indicates a system that is overkill for 1080p, excellent for 1440p, and fully capable for 4K gaming.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K resolution with the Ultra preset?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playable threshold of 60 FPS. It is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo achieves at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate is recorded at 1920x1080 with Low settings, where the system achieves an average of 333 FPS. For more realistic settings, the High preset yields 210 FPS, and the Ultra preset yields 163 FPS.

Q: How does this system perform at 1440p compared to 4K?

A: At 2560x1440, the system is significantly faster. The Ultra preset averages 107 FPS, which is 47 FPS higher than the 4K Ultra average of 60 FPS. Similarly, the Medium preset at 1440p averages 173 FPS compared to 96 FPS at 4K.

Q: Is there any preset at any resolution where the frame rate drops below 60 FPS?

A: No. Across all tested resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) and all settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra), the average FPS never falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The lowest average recorded is 60 FPS at 4K Ultra.

Q: What are the minimum FPS figures available for this combo?

A: Minimum FPS data is only available for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 3840x2160, the minimum is 82 FPS; at 2560x1440, it is 147 FPS; and at 1920x1080, it is 223 FPS. For other presets, only average FPS is provided.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an average benchmark score of 93,785. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6520P, scores 93,786, a delta of 0%. The AMD EPYC 4564P is 1.5% faster, and the AMD EPYC 9175F is 1.9% faster.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. Low settings produce an average of 333 FPS. Medium settings yield an average of 263 FPS, with a minimum of 223 FPS and a maximum of 302 FPS. High settings average 210 FPS. Ultra settings, the most demanding, still achieve a high average of 163 FPS. This resolution shows the system is heavily CPU-bound, as the frame rates are extremely high.

At 2560x1440, the data shows a predictable drop in performance relative to 1080p. Low settings average 219 FPS. Medium settings average 173 FPS, with a minimum of 147 FPS and a maximum of 199 FPS. High settings average 138 FPS. Ultra settings average 107 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is approximately 34% fewer frames at the Ultra preset, indicating that the GPU is becoming a more significant factor.

At 3840x2160, the performance scales down further, but remains playable. Low settings average 122 FPS. Medium settings average 96 FPS, with a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS. High settings average 77 FPS. Ultra settings average exactly 60 FPS, which is the playable threshold. The gap between the Low and Ultra presets at 4K is 62 FPS, showing a significant impact of graphics quality on performance at this resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an average benchmark score of 93,785. Its nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, are the Intel Xeon 6520P with a score of 93,786 (a 0% delta), the AMD EPYC 4564P with a score of 95,183 (1.5% faster), the AMD EPYC 9175F with a score of 95,615 (1.9% faster), and the AMD EPYC 4565P with a score of 95,764 (2.1% faster). In Fivem, these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates, as the game is not heavily dependent on CPU threading beyond a certain point, and the deltas are small.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER with a score of 54,209 (a 0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X with a score of 54,828 (1.1% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB with a score of 55,698 (2.6% faster), and the AMD Radeon 8060S with a score of 55,757 (2.7% faster). In practice, the RTX 4080 SUPER would perform within 1% of the RTX 4080, meaning users would see essentially the same frame rates. The AMD options, while slightly higher in synthetic scores, would also fall within a margin that is unlikely to produce a noticeable difference in Fivem's average FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of exactly 60 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and the system just meets the playable threshold. For a more comfortable margin, the High preset offers 77 FPS, and Medium offers 96 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 107 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a smooth experience with maximum visual fidelity. The High preset offers 138 FPS, and Medium offers 173 FPS for users who prefer higher refresh rates.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is also the best, with an average of 163 FPS. This resolution is clearly where the system excels, providing high frame rates even at maximum settings. The High preset offers 210 FPS, and Medium offers 263 FPS, which are ideal for 240Hz or 360Hz displays.

The Verdict

Based on the verdict data, this PC can run Fivem with all settings playable at every resolution. At 3840x2160, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with the best being Ultra at an average of 60 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 107 FPS. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 163 FPS. The system clears the 60 FPS threshold for every single combination of resolution and preset tested. The only scenario where it sits right at the line is 4K Ultra, which is a demanding workload for any GPU. For gamers prioritizing high refresh rates, the 1080p and 1440p results are exceptional, with even the Ultra presets delivering over 100 FPS. The data confirms that this is a top-tier configuration for Fivem, offering maximum settings at 1440p and 1080p with substantial headroom, and max settings at 4K with a playable 60 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly CPU-limited. The average FPS at Low settings is 333, which is extraordinarily high. The scaling from Low to Ultra is 333 to 163 FPS, a 51% drop. This indicates that the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K, is capable of feeding the GPU an enormous number of frames, but the GPU is handling the increased graphical load. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,439, is a key factor here.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts towards the GPU. The Low preset averages 219 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 107 FPS, a 51% drop as well. However, the absolute frame rates are lower than at 1080p, showing that the GPU is now the primary limiting factor. The RTX 4080's raw throughput, with its 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, is being taxed more heavily.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The Low preset averages 122 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 60 FPS, a 51% drop. The average frame rates are roughly half of what they are at 1080p for the same settings. This is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario, where the pixel count is quadrupled from 1080p to 4K. The CPU's role diminishes, as it is not the limiting factor. The data shows that for Fivem, the RTX 4080 is the component that dictates performance at 4K, while the Core Ultra 7 270K is more than sufficient for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming.