Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 16 | 20 | 25 | 32 |
| 1440p QHD | 29 | 37 | 46 | 58 |
| 1080p Full HD | 43 | 56 | 70 | 88 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data for Fivem shows a steep performance curve across resolutions and presets. At 3840x2160, the combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Arc B390 produces an average of 20 FPS on High settings, 25 FPS on Medium, and only 16 FPS on Ultra. The Low preset at 4K reaches 32 FPS average, which remains far below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The only 4K entry with min and max values recorded is Medium, showing a range of 22 to 29 FPS, indicating consistent sub-30 performance without meaningful fluctuation.
Dropping to 2560x1440 improves averages substantially but still leaves the system short of smooth playability. High settings deliver 37 FPS average, Medium reaches 46 FPS with a recorded range of 39 to 53 FPS, and Ultra sits at 29 FPS. The Low preset at 1440p is the strongest showing for this resolution at 58 FPS average, yet it still misses the 60 FPS target by a narrow margin. The Medium preset range at 1440p shows that even the maximum recorded frame rate of 53 FPS falls below the playable threshold.
At 1920x1080, the picture changes meaningfully. Low settings deliver 88 FPS average, Medium produces 70 FPS with a range of 59 to 80 FPS, and High reaches 56 FPS. Ultra at 1080p drops to 43 FPS average. The Medium preset at 1080p is the only configuration across all resolutions and settings that both clears the 60 FPS average and maintains a minimum of 59 FPS, just one frame below the target. Low at 1080p offers a comfortable margin with an 88 FPS average, giving headroom for multiplayer scenes with heavy activity.
The data indicates that the integrated Arc B390 graphics solution, paired with the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, behaves as a 1080p-oriented configuration for Fivem. Every 4K result fails to approach playability, and 1440p results top out just under the threshold. The pattern is consistent: each resolution step down approximately doubles the usable preset ceiling.
How This Combo Ranks
The database ranks this pairing at 3294 out of 3707 tested combinations for Fivem, placing it in the lower portion of the field. That rank reflects the GPU's limited output rather than the CPU's capability. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus sits in the 96th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 93785. The Arc B390, by contrast, lands in the 9th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 1482.
The CPU and GPU performance gap is stark. The processor's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon 6520P at a nearly identical average score of 93786 (0% delta), the AMD EPYC 4564P at 95183 (1.5% higher), the AMD EPYC 9175F at 95615 (1.9% higher), and the AMD EPYC 4565P at 95764 (2.1% higher). These deltas are small enough that the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and its closest competitors would produce effectively indistinguishable results in Fivem, where the graphics workload dominates.
The GPU's nearest rivals tell a different story. The Arc B390 scores 1.3% above the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, 1.5% above the GeForce 800M, 2.5% above the GeForce GT 625 OEM, and 2.7% above the GeForce GT 710. These are all low-end or legacy parts, and the small percentage gaps mean the Arc B390 behaves within the same performance class as those older GPUs. The 3294th overall rank in Fivem is therefore driven almost entirely by the graphics side of the pairing, with the CPU contributing little to the final outcome.
In practical terms, this combination ranks in the bottom 11% of tested combos for Fivem. The processor is a high-end desktop part with 24 cores and 24 threads, but the integrated graphics solution cannot translate that compute capacity into high frame rates in this title.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The database records no playable settings for this resolution, and the best available option, Low at 32 FPS average, still falls 28 frames short of the target. The verdict data confirms that 4K is not viable for this combination in Fivem.
At 2560x1440, the situation is nearly identical. No preset clears 60 FPS, and the best result is Low at 58 FPS average. That 2 FPS gap is the closest this pairing comes to playability at 1440p, but it remains below the threshold. Medium and High both fail by wider margins, at 46 and 37 FPS respectively.
At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is Medium, which delivers 70 FPS average with a recorded minimum of 59 and maximum of 80. The database confirms Medium as the best settings choice at this resolution, with Low also clearing the threshold at 88 FPS average. High at 56 FPS and Ultra at 43 FPS both fall short. Users seeking the highest visual quality while maintaining 60 FPS should select Medium at 1080p, as it provides the best balance in the recorded data.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU side, the nearest rivals to the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus are all server-class processors. The Intel Xeon 6520P matches it almost exactly at 93786 average score (0% delta), meaning Fivem performance would be indistinguishable between the two in CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD EPYC 4564P at 95183 average score of 95183 delivers 1.5% higher performance, the AMD EPYC 9175F at 1.9% higher, and the AMD EPYC 4565P at 2.9% higher. In practice, any of these alternatives would behave identically in Fivem because the game's frame rate is limited by graphics output, not CPU throughput. None of the rivals differ by more than 2.1%, so swapping the processor to any of these parts would not change the measured FPS results in any meaningful way.
On the GPU side, the Arc B390's nearest rivals are all NVIDIA parts with very small performance gaps. The GeForce GT 520MX trails by 1.3%, the GeForce 800M by 1.5%, the GeForce GT 625 OEM by 2.3%, and the GeForce GT 710 by 2.7%. A user moving from any of these GPUs to the Arc B390 would see a frame rate improvement of only a few percentage points, which translates to a difference of roughly 1 FPS at the frame rates recorded in Fivem. Conversely, someone considering a downgrade from the Arc B390 to a GeForce GT 710 would lose roughly the same amount of performance. The practical implication is that any of these GPUs would produce nearly the same Fivem experience in this title, all clustered near the lower end of the performance spectrum.
The database shows the Arc B390 and its nearest rivals all operate in a narrow band, with the entire spread from top to bottom spanning just 2.7 percentage points. In an FPS context, the difference at 1080p Medium settings, a 1.3% delta represents roughly 1 FPS difference per step, a small enough change that the results would be hard to distinguish in actual multiplayer gameplay.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS?
A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080 on Low or Medium settings. The recorded data shows 88 FPS average on Low and 70 FPS average on Medium at 1080p. At 2560x1440, the best result is 58 FPS average on Low, just below the threshold, and 3840x1440p does not reach playability at any preset.
Q: What is the best preset at 1920x1080 that stays above 60 FPS?
**A: The best settings that clears 60 FPS at 1920x1080 are Low and Medium. Medium is the best playable preset at 70 FPS average, with a minimum of 59 FPS recorded, and Low delivers 88 FPS average.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 rank among all GPUs?
**A: The Arc B390 is in the 9th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 1482. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX at 1463, a 1.3% difference.
Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus compare to its nearest rivals?
**A: The CPU is in the 96th percentile among all CPUs with an average score of 93785. Its closest rival, the Intel Xeon 6520P, scores 93786, a 0% difference. The AMD EPYC 4564P scores 95183, which is 1.5% higher.
Q: Is 4K playable with this combination?
**A: No. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 32 FPS on Low settings. Medium averages 25 FPS, High averages 20 FPS, and Ultra averages 16 FPS. No 4K preset approaches the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the best preset at 2560x1440?
**A: The best preset at 2560x1440 is Low, which delivers 58 FPS average. Medium averages 46 FPS with a range of 39 to 53 FPS, High averages 37 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS. None clear 60 FPS.
Q: What is the overall rank of this combination in Fivem?
A: The database places it at 3294 out of 3707 tested combinations, putting it in the lower 11% of the field.
The Verdict
The verdict data is unambiguous: this PC can run Fivem only at 1920x1920x1080, and only on Low or Medium settings. Medium at 1080p delivers 70 FPS average, the best playable settings per 1080p. Low at 1080p delivers 88 FPS average, providing margin for gameplay spikes. The 2560x1440 resolution is not playable because the best result, Low at 58 FPS average, falls below 60 FPS threshold at 1440p by just 2 frames per second gap at 1080p. 3840x2160 resolution is not playable at any preset, with the best 4K result being Low at 32 FPS average, far below 60 FPS threshold at 1080p. The 4K experience is not viable for this combination in Fivem.
The bottleneck is clearly the Arc B390. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is capable of 96th percentile CPU performance with a 125W TDP, and the CPU's nearest rivals all score within 2.5% of its average benchmark score 93785, indicating that the CPU is not limiting Fivem's frame rate. The Arc B390's 9th percentile GPU score of 1482 and its nearest rival, the GT 710 at 1443, 2.7% lower, place it among the lowest-tier graphics solutions in the database. In Fivem, GPU performance, not the CPU's compute, is the limiting factor at 1080p or 4K settings.
For users targeting 60 FPS in Fivem, the data suggests 1080p Medium settings at 70 FPS average is the highest visual quality preset that clears the threshold, with a 60 FPS minimum of 59 FPS recorded. At 1440p or 4K, the system cannot reach 60 FPS at 1080p settings, and the best 1440p result is 58 FPS average at 1440p Low settings.
The verdict by resolution confirms: 1920x1080p playable settings list includes Low and Medium at 1080p, with Medium at 70 FPS average at 1080p. At 2560x1440p playable settings list is empty at 1440p settings, and 3840x2160p playable settings list is empty at 4K settings. In other words, the data shows this combo clears 60 FPS only at 1080p Medium settings.