Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
333 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
163 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
219 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
107 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
122 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
4.8ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 70,879
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 77 96 122
1440p QHD 107 138 173 219
1080p Full HD 163 210 263 333

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 210
1920x1080 Low 333
1920x1080 Medium 263
1920x1080 Ultra 163
2560x1440 High 138
2560x1440 Low 219
2560x1440 Medium 173
2560x1440 Ultra 107
3840x2160 High 77
3840x2160 Low 122
3840x2160 Medium 96
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination is a high-end pairing for Fivem. The data shows this system delivers 60 FPS or higher at every tested resolution and preset, with the most demanding setting—Ultra—still clearing the playable threshold at 4K. This analysis uses measured FPS data to show exactly what this combo can do, where it sits relative to other hardware, and which settings to choose for a smooth multiplayer experience.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 70879, which places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The closest match is the Intel Xeon 6511P, with an average score of 71051, a delta of -0.2 percent. That difference is negligible—in practical terms, a system using the Xeon 6511P would behave almost identically to the Ultra 7 265K in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 scores 71370, a -0.7 percent delta, which is still within noise for most gaming workloads. On the other side, the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163, a +1 percent delta, meaning the Ultra 7 265K is marginally ahead of it. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, a +1.3 percent delta, so the Ultra 7 265K holds a small but measurable advantage over that chip. For Fivem, which can be sensitive to single-thread performance in crowded multiplayer areas, the Ultra 7 265K’s position among these rivals suggests that swapping to any of these four CPUs would produce similar frame rates, provided the GPU remains the bottleneck.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, with an average score of 54209, a delta of 0.1 percent—essentially a tie. In gaming, the RTX 4080 SUPER would deliver frame rates within a rounding error of the RTX 4080. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, a -1.1 percent delta, which is slightly higher on paper but not enough to create a visible difference in Fivem’s frame pacing. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, a -2.6 percent delta, meaning the RTX 4080 is actually a bit behind this AMD card in raw benchmark terms, but the RTX 4080’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and higher memory bandwidth (716.8 GB/s) give it an edge in texture-heavy scenarios that Fivem’s large open world can present. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, a -2.7 percent delta, similar to the RX 6750 GRE. In practice, if you were to swap the RTX 4080 for any of these four GPUs, you would likely see frame rates within a few percent of each other at the same settings. The RTX 4080’s advantage lies in its 16 GB memory capacity, which is more future-proof for modded Fivem servers that load large custom assets.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings, the measured average FPS is 60, which exactly meets the playable threshold of 60 FPS. This is the most demanding preset at the highest resolution, and it still clears the bar, though without headroom for dips.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p to maximize visual quality while staying smooth?

A: At 2560x1440, Ultra settings produce an average of 107 FPS. Since all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are listed as playable at this resolution, Ultra is the best choice—it delivers more than 100 FPS while offering the highest visual fidelity.

Q: How much faster is this combo at 1080p compared to 4K?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 333, while at 3840x2160 with Low settings, it drops to 122. That is a difference of 211 FPS, showing that the RTX 4080 is heavily resolution-bound. Even at Ultra settings, 1080p averages 163 FPS versus 60 FPS at 4K.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 a better match for this CPU than other GPUs?

A: Based on the GPU’s nearest rivals, the RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest match with a 0.1 percent delta in average benchmark score. However, the data does not show combined CPU-GPU benchmarks, so the recommendation is to consider the RTX 4080 SUPER as a drop-in equivalent. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and Radeon 8060S have higher average scores but lower memory bandwidth and capacity, which may matter in Fivem’s asset streaming.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in Fivem?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 70879 is in the 94th percentile, while the GPU’s score of 54247 is in the 86th percentile. In Fivem, which is often CPU-bound in busy multiplayer areas, the Ultra 7 265K’s 20 cores and 20 threads (with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz) provide enough headroom to keep the RTX 4080 fed. The measured FPS at 1080p (333 FPS on Low) indicates no severe bottleneck at that resolution.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The only preset with min FPS data is Medium at each resolution. At 3840x2160, the min is 82 FPS; at 2560x1440, the min is 147 FPS; at 1920x1080, the min is 223 FPS. Other presets do not have min FPS recorded in the data, so only these three figures are available.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages exactly 60 FPS. This is a tight fit—any frame rate drop below 60 would push it under the playable threshold, but the average holds. For a more comfortable margin, Medium averages 96 FPS with a min of 82 FPS, which is safer for unpredictable multiplayer moments. High averages 77 FPS, and Low averages 122 FPS. The recommendation for 4K is Ultra if you accept the 60 FPS average, but Medium is the practical choice for consistent smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, averaging 107 FPS. This gives substantial headroom above the threshold, so Ultra is the clear best setting. Medium averages 173 FPS with a min of 147 FPS, High averages 138 FPS, and Low averages 219 FPS. All presets are playable, but Ultra offers the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, averaging 163 FPS. This is far above the threshold, so Ultra is the best setting for 1080p. Medium averages 263 FPS with a min of 223 FPS, High averages 210 FPS, and Low averages 333 FPS. At this resolution, the RTX 4080 is so fast that even Ultra leaves massive headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC can run Fivem at every resolution and preset combination tested, with all twelve measured configurations clearing the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the verdict is playable at Ultra with an average of 60 FPS, but the margin is minimal—the data lists Ultra as the best settings, yet the average exactly equals the playable threshold. For a more stable experience at 4K, Medium offers 96 FPS with a min of 82 FPS, which is the safer choice. At 2560x1440, the verdict is playable at Ultra with 107 FPS, providing a comfortable buffer. At 1920x1080, the verdict is playable at Ultra with 163 FPS, making this combo overkill for 1080p gaming—it would be better suited to high-refresh-rate monitors or more demanding games. Overall, this system is fully capable of running Fivem, with the only caveat being that 4K Ultra runs right at the 60 FPS line, so players who prefer consistent high frame rates should consider Medium at 4K or stick to 1440p Ultra.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured FPS varies significantly by preset. Low settings average 122 FPS, with no min or max recorded. Medium settings average 96 FPS, with a min of 82 FPS and a max of 110 FPS. High settings average 77 FPS, with no min or max recorded. Ultra settings average 60 FPS, with no min or max recorded. The spread from Low to Ultra is 62 FPS, showing that the RTX 4080’s 16 GB memory and 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are taxed heavily at 4K, but even the lowest preset remains well above 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the measured FPS jumps considerably. Low settings average 219 FPS, with no min or max recorded. Medium settings average 173 FPS, with a min of 147 FPS and a max of 199 FPS. High settings average 138 FPS, with no min or max recorded. Ultra settings average 107 FPS, with no min or max recorded. The difference between 4K and 1440p is stark—at Ultra, the frame rate nearly doubles from 60 to 107 FPS. This indicates that the RTX 4080 is resolution-bound, and 1440p is the sweet spot for this GPU in Fivem, offering high visual quality with triple-digit frame rates.

At 1920x1080, the measured FPS is extremely high across all presets. Low settings average 333 FPS, with no min or max recorded. Medium settings average 263 FPS, with a min of 223 FPS and a max of 302 FPS. High settings average 210 FPS, with no min or max recorded. Ultra settings average 163 FPS, with no min or max recorded. Even at Ultra, the system produces more than double the 60 FPS threshold. The min FPS recorded at Medium (223 FPS) is higher than the average FPS at 4K Ultra (60 FPS), highlighting how much headroom this combo has at 1080p. For players using a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor, this system can easily drive those refresh rates at 1080p with Ultra settings.

The pattern across resolutions shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p provides the highest frame rates, 1440p offers a balance of quality and speed, and 4K Ultra is playable but with no margin for error. The min FPS data, where available, shows that even the lowest recorded frame rates at Medium settings (82 FPS at 4K, 147 FPS at 1440p, 223 FPS at 1080p) remain above 60 FPS, indicating stable performance without severe drops.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Fivem, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 220 out of 3707 total combos. That places it in the top 5.9 percent of all tested systems. The rank of 220 means there are 219 other combinations that deliver higher average frame rates in Fivem, but given that this combo already achieves 163 FPS at 1080p Ultra and 107 FPS at 1440p Ultra, the higher-ranked systems are likely using even more powerful GPUs or CPUs—though the data does not specify which those are. The percentile ranking for the CPU (94th) and GPU (86th) individually suggests that the CPU is stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is, which aligns with Fivem’s known CPU sensitivity in multiplayer scenarios. The combo rank of 220 out of 3707 is strong but not top-tier—it reflects that this is a high-end setup that will handle Fivem effortlessly at most settings, but there are faster combinations available for players who demand 240+ FPS at 1080p or higher frame rates at 4K. In practical terms, a rank of 220 means this system will outperform the vast majority of other players’ machines in Fivem, but it is not the absolute fastest configuration possible. The data also shows that the RTX 4080’s nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, would likely achieve a very similar rank, given the 0.1 percent delta in benchmark scores. For players considering this combo, the rank confirms that it is a well-balanced pairing—the CPU’s 20 threads and the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM are both substantial, and the measured FPS across all resolutions and presets supports a smooth Fivem experience. The only scenario where this combo falls short of ideal is 4K Ultra, where the 60 FPS average leaves no headroom, but the rank indicates that this is still a playable and competitive configuration.