Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 67 | 87 | 109 | 138 |
| 1440p QHD | 122 | 157 | 196 | 248 |
| 1080p Full HD | 185 | 238 | 297 | 377 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination produces exceptionally high frame rates in Fivem, positioning it as a top-tier configuration for this multiplayer title. The data shows that this pairing is capable of delivering smooth gameplay across all tested resolutions and settings, with performance headroom that is rarely stressed by the game’s engine. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, ranking, and component dynamics.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination delivers outstanding results, with the Low preset achieving an average of 377 FPS. The Medium preset averages 297 FPS, with a minimum of 253 FPS and a maximum of 342 FPS. High settings produce an average of 238 FPS, while the Ultra preset remains well above the playable threshold at 185 FPS. Even the minimum frame rates at 1080p, where recorded, are more than three times the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down but remains exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 248 FPS, while Medium achieves 196 FPS, with a minimum of 166 FPS and a maximum of 225 FPS. High settings yield 157 FPS, and Ultra still maintains a robust 122 FPS average. The frame time consistency at this resolution is strong, with the Medium preset’s minimum FPS only about 15% below its average.
At 3840x2160, the demands of 4K rendering are evident, but the RTX 5090’s capabilities keep performance well within playable ranges. The Low preset averages 138 FPS, and Medium delivers 109 FPS, with a minimum of 92 FPS and a maximum of 125 FPS. High settings produce 87 FPS, and Ultra, the most demanding preset, still averages 67 FPS. The data indicates that even at 4K Ultra, this system never dips below the 60 FPS threshold, as the verdict confirms all settings are playable.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of 3707 tested combinations for Fivem, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 holds the rank of 59. This places it in the top 2% of all tested configurations, reflecting the high level of performance from both the CPU and GPU. The combo’s percentile ranking among all CPUs is 93, and among all GPUs is 92, indicating that both components are near the top of their respective performance hierarchies. The rank of 59 is a direct consequence of the GPU’s immense rasterization power and the CPU’s strong single-thread capabilities, which are critical for a multiplayer title like Fivem. While the absolute rank is impressive, the more relevant takeaway is the consistency of performance across all settings, meaning users can expect a uniformly high experience without needing to compromise on visual quality.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in workload balance between the CPU and GPU as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the performance is largely CPU-bound, as indicated by the high frame rates that approach the limits of what a processor can feed to the GPU. The jump from 377 FPS at Low to 185 FPS at Ultra shows a 192 FPS swing, which is a 51% reduction in performance. This large drop is characteristic of a CPU-limited scenario where the GPU is waiting for the CPU to deliver draw calls. The Core Ultra 7 265, with its 20 cores and 20 threads, provides sufficient throughput, but the game’s engine at 1080p is not fully leveraging the GPU’s potential.
At 2560x1440, the balance begins to shift toward the GPU, but the CPU still plays a significant role. The performance drop from Low to Ultra is from 248 FPS to 122 FPS, a 126 FPS reduction (51%). This indicates that while the GPU is doing more work, the CPU is still a limiting factor at the lower settings. At this resolution, the RTX 5090’s 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are more utilized, but the frame rates remain sufficiently high that the CPU is still a bottleneck at the Low preset.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The performance scaling from Low (138 FPS) to Ultra (67 FPS) shows a 71 FPS drop, which is a 51% reduction, similar to the other resolutions but from a lower base. This suggests that the GPU is now the primary limiting factor, as the pixel throughput demands at 4K are substantial. The RTX 5090’s 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is heavily taxed at this resolution, and the CPU has more headroom to supply frames. The data shows that the Core Ultra 7 265 is sufficient to keep the RTX 5090 well-fed at 4K, as the frame rates do not collapse but rather scale down predictably with increased GPU load.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Fivem with maximum settings at all tested resolutions. The verdict data confirms that at 3840x2160, all four presets—High, Low, Medium, and Ultra—are playable, with Ultra maintaining an average of 67 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 122 FPS, and at 1920x1080, Ultra averages 185 FPS. The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, and every single configuration tested clears this mark.
The data indicates that the system is not just playable but offers a high-refresh-rate experience at 1440p and 1080p. At 1440p Ultra, the 122 FPS average is suitable for a 120Hz or 144Hz display, while at 1080p Ultra, the 185 FPS average can drive a 165Hz or 240Hz monitor. At 4K Ultra, the 67 FPS average is comfortable for a 60Hz display, and the system provides the option to use High settings for 87 FPS if a higher refresh rate is desired at that resolution. The only scenario where the system does not exceed 60 FPS is at 4K Ultra, but it still meets the threshold, confirming that this is a definitive high-end configuration for Fivem.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are the AMD EPYC 4464P, which scores 64823, a delta of -0.3% from the Core Ultra 7 265’s average of 64640. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64438, a delta of 0.3%, and is virtually identical in performance. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202, a delta of 0.7%, and the AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65104, a delta of -0.7%. These processors would provide similar in-game performance for Fivem, although the EPYC parts are server-focused and may have different platform requirements. The Core Ultra 7 265F is the most direct alternative, as it is the same chip without integrated graphics.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, scoring 79605 (0.3% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, scoring 79396 (0.6% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, scoring 78940 (1.1% delta). The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959, a delta of -1.4%. These alternatives would deliver similar frame rates in Fivem, though the Tesla parts are data-center oriented and lack display outputs, making them unsuitable for a typical gaming PC. The Radeon RX 6850M XT is a mobile GPU, so the closest desktop equivalent in this list is not present, but the data shows that the RTX 5090’s performance class is distinct from these rivals.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 185 FPS. This is the highest quality setting, and the system has ample headroom, so there is no need to reduce settings for a smoother experience. The data shows that even Ultra is over three times the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, with an average of 122 FPS. This provides a high-quality visual experience while still maintaining a frame rate that is suitable for fast-paced multiplayer gameplay. The 122 FPS average is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the system could potentially handle even higher refresh rates if the display supports them.
At 3840x2160, the best setting is Ultra, with an average of 67 FPS. This is the most demanding preset and is still playable, though it is close to the 60 FPS threshold. For users with a 60Hz 4K display, this is the ideal configuration. If a higher refresh rate is desired, dropping to High settings yields 87 FPS, which is a 20 FPS improvement over Ultra. The data suggests that Ultra is the recommended setting for 4K, as it provides the best visual quality without sacrificing playability.
FAQ
Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: The average frame rate is 185 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: Can this system handle 4K at maximum settings?
A: Yes, the data shows that 3840x2160 with Ultra settings produces an average of 67 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded in the tests?
A: The minimum frame rate recorded is 92 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Medium settings.
Q: How does this combination rank among other tested systems for Fivem?
A: It ranks 59th out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the top 2% of all configurations.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1440p?
A: The data shows a balance shift; at 1440p, the CPU is still a significant factor at lower settings, but the GPU becomes more important as settings increase, with the Ultra preset averaging 122 FPS.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the graphics card in this combo?
A: The launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is 1,999 USD, and the CPU has a launch MSRP of $394.