Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
368 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
180 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
242 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
119 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
135 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
66 FPS
4.3ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 64,640
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 66 85 106 135
1440p QHD 119 153 191 242
1080p Full HD 180 232 290 368

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 232
1920x1080 Low 368
1920x1080 Medium 290
1920x1080 Ultra 180
2560x1440 High 153
2560x1440 Low 242
2560x1440 Medium 191
2560x1440 Ultra 119
3840x2160 High 85
3840x2160 Low 135
3840x2160 Medium 106
3840x2160 Ultra 66

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination delivers an exceptionally strong performance profile for Fivem, with measured benchmark data indicating that every tested resolution and preset configuration clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. Across all three resolutions—3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080—the system maintains average frame rates that range from a minimum of 66 FPS at 4K Ultra to a maximum of 368 FPS at 1080p Low, demonstrating that this pairing has substantial headroom for the multiplayer title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160, the system produces an average of 85 FPS on High settings, 135 FPS on Low settings, 106 FPS on Medium settings, and 66 FPS on Ultra settings. The Medium preset at 4K is the only configuration in the entire dataset that includes both minimum and maximum frame rate figures, showing a range of 90 FPS to 122 FPS. This 32 FPS spread indicates that even at the most demanding resolution, frame pacing remains consistent enough to stay well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance uplift is substantial. High settings deliver 153 FPS average, Low settings reach 242 FPS, Medium settings produce 191 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain 119 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution shows a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 220 FPS, creating a 57 FPS variance window. The jump from 4K Ultra to 1440p Ultra represents an 80% increase in average frame rate, from 66 FPS to 119 FPS, which demonstrates how resolution scaling affects this particular game engine.

At 1920x1080, the combination reaches its peak performance envelope. High settings average 232 FPS, Low settings hit 368 FPS, Medium settings sustain 290 FPS, and Ultra settings hold 180 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p shows a minimum of 247 FPS and a maximum of 334 FPS. Notably, the 1080p Low configuration at 368 FPS represents the highest average frame rate recorded across any resolution and setting combination in the dataset, while 1080p Ultra at 180 FPS still more than triples the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU each have nearest rivals that provide context for how this combination compares to other hardware pairings. For the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, the nearest competitor is the AMD EPYC 4464P, which has an average benchmark score of 64823, representing a 0.3% deltaPct difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F sits just 0.3% below in the rankings with a score of 64438. The AMD EPYC 7343 trails by 0.7% with a score of 64202, while the AMD EPYC 9124 sits 0.7% ahead with a score of 65104. These four rivals bracket the Core Ultra 7 265 within a tight performance band, indicating that any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same GPU.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4090's nearest rival is the Intel Arc Pro A60, which matches its average score of 60347 with a 0% deltaPct. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 comes within 0.3% with a score of 60140, while the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M sits 2.5% ahead at 61896, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 trails by 2.9% at 58657. The extremely small deltas among these rivals suggest that swapping the RTX 4090 for any of these alternatives would result in frame rate differences of only a few percentage points, keeping the overall experience in the same performance class. However, the RTX 4090's 24 GB GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth provide capacity advantages that these rivals may not match in other workloads.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific CPU and GPU pairing ranks 97th out of 3,707 tested combinations for Fivem, placing it in the top 2.6% of all configurations evaluated. This ranking reflects the combined capabilities of the Core Ultra 7 265 and RTX 4090, where the CPU's 20 cores and 30 MB of shared L3 cache complement the GPU's 16,384 shading units and 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The percentile ranking of 93 for the CPU against all CPUs and 88 for the GPU against all GPUs further contextualizes this result, showing that both components sit comfortably in the upper echelon of their respective categories.

The rank of 97 out of 3,707 combos indicates that there are 96 other configurations that achieve higher frame rates in Fivem, but the practical difference at these performance levels is minimal given the playable threshold of 60 FPS. The data shows that this combo clears the threshold by at least 10% even in the most demanding scenario tested, which is 4K Ultra at 66 FPS average. The combination's rank relative to its component percentiles suggests that Fivem benefits from the high single-thread performance of the Core Ultra 7 265, which scores 5960 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4689 in PassMark single-thread testing.

The Verdict

The benchmark data conclusively demonstrates that this PC can run Fivem at all tested resolutions and presets while maintaining frame rates above the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the verdict lists all four settings—High, Low, Medium, and Ultra—as playable, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 66 FPS. At 2560x1440, all settings are again playable, with Ultra achieving 119 FPS average. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 180 FPS average on Ultra settings, making every resolution and preset combination viable for competitive multiplayer play.

The 4K Ultra configuration at 66 FPS average is the closest this combination comes to the playable threshold, but it still maintains a 10% margin above 60 FPS. For players prioritizing maximum visual fidelity, this means 4K Ultra is viable, though the lack of minimum FPS data for this preset means there is some uncertainty about the lowest frame rates encountered during intense multiplayer scenes. The 4K Medium preset provides more headroom with a 106 FPS average and a documented minimum of 90 FPS, making it the safer choice for players who want consistent performance at 4K while retaining reasonable visual quality.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combination achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 368 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured data shows an average of 66 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra settings, which is 10% above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the lowest average frame rate recorded across all tested configurations?

A: The lowest average is 66 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra settings, which remains above the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations for Fivem?

A: The combination ranks 97th out of 3,707 tested combos, placing it in the top 2.6% of all configurations in the database.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between 4K Medium and 4K Ultra settings?

A: The 4K Medium preset averages 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 FPS, while 4K Ultra averages 66 FPS, representing a 40 FPS difference between the two presets.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 1440p Ultra settings?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440 Ultra settings the system averages 119 FPS, nearly double the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 66 FPS. This configuration represents the maximum visual quality available while still maintaining playable frame rates, though the margin above the threshold is relatively slim. Players seeking additional performance headroom at 4K can drop to Medium settings, which deliver 106 FPS average with a minimum of 90 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are Ultra at an average of 119 FPS. This resolution provides nearly double the frame rate of 4K Ultra while maintaining identical visual settings, making it the optimal balance of image quality and performance. The 1440p Ultra configuration offers a 53 FPS advantage over 4K Ultra, which is a substantial improvement for fast-paced multiplayer scenarios.

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings achieve 180 FPS average, which is the highest quality preset available at this resolution. The 1080p Ultra configuration provides more than triple the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring that even the most demanding multiplayer moments with many players on screen will remain smooth. For players with high refresh rate monitors, the 1080p Medium preset at 290 FPS or the Low preset at 368 FPS can take full advantage of 240 Hz and 360 Hz displays, though Ultra at 180 FPS remains the recommended setting for those prioritizing visual quality over raw frame rate.