Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

79%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
189 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
92 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
124 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
61 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
69 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
34 FPS
8.4ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 64,640
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 44 54 69
1440p QHD 61 78 98 124
1080p Full HD 92 119 149 189

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 119
1920x1080 Low 189
1920x1080 Medium 149
1920x1080 Ultra 92
2560x1440 High 78
2560x1440 Low 124
2560x1440 Medium 98
2560x1440 Ultra 61
3840x2160 High 44
3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 54
3840x2160 Ultra 34

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

# Fivem Performance Analysis: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

The pairing of Intel's Core Ultra 7 265 with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4060 represents a modern mid-range to high-end combination. The CPU delivers strong single-thread and multi-thread performance, while the GPU provides a capable Ada Lovelace architecture-based graphics solution. This analysis examines the measured FPS data across various resolutions and presets to determine the viability of this configuration for Fivem.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The data provides a clear picture of performance scaling across resolutions and quality settings. At the native 4K resolution (3840x2160), the system delivers an average of 44 FPS on the High preset, which falls below the 60 FPS target. Lowering the settings to Medium improves the average to 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 and a maximum of 63 FPS. The Low preset at 4K achieves a 69 FPS average, crossing the 60 FPS threshold, though the data notes the minimum and maximum FPS values are not specified. At the Ultra preset, average FPS drops to 34, confirming that 4K Ultra settings are beyond this combination's comfort zone.

Moving to 1440p (2560x1440), the performance improves considerably. The High preset delivers an average of 78 FPS, and the Low preset reaches an average of 124 FPS. The Medium preset shows an average of 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 and maximum of 113. The Ultra preset at 1440p achieves a 61 FPS average, just at the edge of the 60 FPS threshold. The data indicates that the playable settings at this resolution are High, Low, Medium, and Ultra.

At 1080p, the system shows its strength. The High preset averages 119 FPS, while Low averages 189 FPS. The Medium preset averages 149 FPS, with a minimum of 127 and a maximum of 171 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still manages an average of 92 FPS. All four presets at 1080p exceed the 60 FPS baseline, indicating a fully playable experience.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals the balance between the CPU and GPU. At 1080p, even the Ultra preset holds an average of 92 FPS, suggesting that the RTX 4060 is not the primary constraint at this resolution. The GPU's capabilities are sufficient to handle the game's rendering demands at high frame rates. The Core Ultra 7 265's strong single-threaded performance is a plus for game logic and simulation tasks.

As resolution increases to 1440p, the Ultra preset drops to a 61 FPS average. This is a 34% decrease from the 1080p Ultra score. The GPU begins to take on a more significant load, but the system still maintains the 60 FPS mark. At 4K, the Ultra preset falls to 34 FPS, a 63% decrease from 1440p Ultra. The High preset at 4K runs at 44 FPS, while the Medium preset achieves 54 FPS and Low reaches 69 FPS. This scaling behavior is consistent with the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302, which positions the RTX 4060 in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. It is a card that handles 1080p and 1440p gaming with ease, while 4K gaming requires reduced settings.

The CPU's role is also evident in the physics and simulation aspects of Fivem. The Core Ultra 7 265's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 places the CPU in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, indicating robust multi-threaded performance. The game's single-core performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960. The Passmark Interprocess Communication score of 40456 and the Data Compression score of 522983 indicate strong memory and inter-core communication capabilities, which are relevant for the game's open-world simulation and asset streaming.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank in-game is 1993 out of 3707 tested combos. This places the pairing in the upper-middle tier of tested configurations. The nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P, has an average benchmark score of 64823, which is a mere 0.3% ahead of this configuration's CPU score. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is 0.3% behind the 265, while the AMD EPYC 7343 is 0.7% behind. On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon HD 7790 is 0.2% behind the RTX 4060, while the AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% ahead. These results indicate a well-balanced pairing, with both components performing in line with their immediate competitors.

The Verdict

The data shows this system can run Fivem. The key question is whether it maintains the 60 FPS threshold at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, all presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—meet the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset at 1080p achieves an average of 92 FPS. This configuration is more than capable of delivering a smooth experience at the most common resolution.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 124 FPS, Medium 98 FPS, High 78 FPS, and Ultra 61 FPS. The Ultra preset is right at the threshold, maintaining an average of 61 FPS. The High preset also clears the threshold with 78 FPS. These settings are all playable.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is mixed. The Low preset averages 69 FPS and clears the threshold. The Medium preset averages 54 FPS, falling short of the 60 FPS mark. The High preset averages 44 FPS, and Ultra averages 34 FPS, both below playability. Therefore, a 4K display requires the Low preset to maintain a 60 FPS experience. The data indicates the GPU becomes a limiting factor at this resolution with higher presets.

FAQ

Q: Can the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 run Fivem at 1080p?

A: Yes. The benchmark data shows the High preset averaging 119 FPS and the Ultra preset averaging 92 FPS at 1920x1080. Both are far above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What about 1440p gaming?

A: Yes. The High preset achieves a 78 FPS average, Medium 98 FPS, Low 124 FPS, Ultra 61 FPS. All four presets are at or above 60 FPS.

Q: Can this PC handle 4K Fivem?

A: Only with the Low preset, which averages 69 FPS. The Medium preset averages 44 FPS, High 44 FPS, and Ultra 34 FPS, all of which fall below the 60 FPS target.

Q: How does this combo compare to nearby rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 64640 is 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P and 0.7% behind the AMD EPYC 7343. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666, a 0.2% difference, while the AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% ahead.

Best Settings per Resolution

For a 60 FPS target, the most demanding preset that remains at or above the threshold is the recommended setting.

  • 3840x2160: Low — averages 69 FPS
  • 2560x1440: Ultra — averages 61 FPS
  • 1920x1080: Ultra — averages 92 FPS

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rivals, the following configurations would behave in a comparable manner:

  • CPU: The AMD EPYC 4464P produces an average benchmark score of 64823, a 0.3% difference from the Core Ultra 7 265's 64640. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64438, a 0.3% difference. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202, a 0.7% difference.
  • GPU: The AMD Radeon HD 7790 averages 17666, a 0.2% difference from the RTX 4060's 17639. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, a 0.3% difference, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551, a 0.5% difference.