Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
154 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
75 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
101 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
50 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
56 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
10.3ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 64,640
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 35 44 56
1440p QHD 50 64 80 101
1080p Full HD 75 97 121 154

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 97
1920x1080 Low 154
1920x1080 Medium 121
1920x1080 Ultra 75
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Low 101
2560x1440 Medium 80
2560x1440 Ultra 50
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a distinctly split experience in Fivem, with strong performance at mainstream resolutions but a clear wall at 4K. The data shows a system that is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, comfortably clearing the 60 FPS threshold at high settings, yet it falls short of that mark at 3840x2160 across all tested presets. This analysis breaks down the measured frame rates, contextualizes the combo's rank among thousands of tested configurations, and provides actionable guidance on settings and expectations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured performance data reveals a predictable scaling pattern tied to resolution and graphical preset. At 1920x1080, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the Intel Arc B580 demonstrates strong headroom. The Low preset produces an average of 154 FPS, which is the highest recorded for this combo. Moving up through the presets, Medium yields an average of 121 FPS with a minimum of 103 FPS and a maximum of 140 FPS. High settings still deliver a robust 97 FPS average, while the Ultra preset, which is the most demanding tested, maintains an average of 75 FPS. These figures indicate that at 1080p, the combination is capable of high refresh rate gameplay even at the highest quality settings, with all presets staying well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance drops are noticeable but the system retains its playable status for most presets. The Low preset averages 101 FPS, which is a 34% reduction from the 1080p Low result, showing the expected cost of additional pixels. Medium settings produce an average of 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS, indicating that even during demanding scenes, the frame rate stays above the playable threshold. The High preset averages 64 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS line, but it remains a viable option for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset, however, drops to an average of 50 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold and indicates that this setting is not recommended for 1440p. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent reduction in average FPS of roughly 33-35% across presets, which is typical for a GPU-bound workload.

At 3840x2160, the Intel Arc B580 begins to struggle, and no preset achieves the 60 FPS playability threshold. The Low preset averages 56 FPS, which is the closest to playable but still falls short. Medium settings yield an average of 44 FPS, with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 51 FPS, showing that the frame rate fluctuates but never approaches a smooth experience. The High preset averages only 35 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 28 FPS. These results clearly demonstrate that 4K resolution is beyond the capabilities of this particular CPU-GPU combination for Fivem, regardless of graphics settings. The minimum frame rates at Medium 4K (38 FPS) and the average at High 4K (35 FPS) suggest that even with reduced settings, the experience would be stutter-prone and far from the 60 FPS target.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2788 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the lower 25% of all tested configurations, which might seem surprising given the strong performance at 1080p. However, this ranking reflects the entire spectrum of hardware tested, including high-end CPUs and GPUs that can handle 4K easily. The combo's percentile position is not a measure of absolute capability but rather its standing relative to all other pairings in the database. Given that it achieves playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, the rank of 2788 indicates that while it is not a top-tier performer, it sits well within the range of systems that can deliver a competent Fivem experience at mainstream resolutions.

The rank also highlights that Fivem, being a multiplayer title with a large open world, is sensitive to both CPU and GPU performance. The Core Ultra 7 265 is a high-end desktop processor with a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, suggesting it has ample headroom for the game's simulation and networking demands. The Arc B580, with a 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs, is a mid-range performer. The combination's overall rank of 2788 suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing, especially at higher resolutions where the gap between CPU and GPU capabilities becomes more pronounced. It is worth remembering the combo rank is relative to other combinations in the database, and a rank of 2788 out of 3707 does not preclude a smooth 1080p experience, as the measured FPS data confirms.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: No. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, the best average FPS is 56 on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. All other presets (Medium 44 FPS, High 35 FPS, Ultra 28 FPS) also fall short. The verdict for 4K lists no playable settings.

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: The High preset achieves an average of 64 FPS at 1440p. The Medium preset also clears the threshold with an average of 80 FPS and a minimum of 68 FPS. The Ultra preset does not meet the threshold, averaging 50 FPS.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at 1920x1080?

A: Yes. At 1080p, the Ultra preset produces an average of 75 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict for this resolution lists Ultra as the best playable setting.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to its nearest rivals in overall GPU benchmarks?

A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score is 23021. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with a score of 23061 (0.2% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with a score of 22895 (0.6% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 with a score of 23172 (0.7% higher). These deltas are minimal, indicating very similar overall performance.

Q: Which component is more important for Fivem at 1440p?

A: The GPU appears to be the primary constraint at 1440p. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent 33-35% drop in average FPS across presets, which is typical for GPU-bound workloads. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking suggests it is not the bottleneck at this resolution.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values recorded for the Medium preset?

A: For the Medium preset, the minimum FPS is 103 at 1920x1080, 68 at 2560x1440, and 38 at 3840x2160. These values indicate the lowest frame rates experienced during testing, which are relevant for understanding stutter potential.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64640. Its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are the AMD EPYC 4464P with an average score of 64823 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with a score of 64438 (0.3% lower), the AMD EPYC 7343 with a score of 64202 (0.7% lower), and the AMD EPYC 9124 with a score of 65104 (0.7% higher). In practical terms for Fivem, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates when paired with a similar GPU, as the differences in average benchmark scores are within 1%. The choice among them would be driven by platform features like socket type and memory support, not gaming performance.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with a score of 23061 (0.2% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with a score of 22895 (0.6% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 with a score of 23172 (0.7% higher). A system with any of these GPUs paired with a similarly performing CPU would produce nearly identical FPS in Fivem. The RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 are notably older architectures but their comparable scores suggest they would offer a similar experience at 1080p and 1440p. The RX 580 2048SP, being a much older card, would also perform similarly in this specific title, based on the benchmark data.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 75 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and it still provides a comfortable margin above the playability threshold. For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity, Ultra is the recommended choice at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, with an average of 64 FPS. While this clears the 60 FPS line, the margin is slim. The Medium preset, averaging 80 FPS, offers a more stable experience with a minimum of 68 FPS, and may be preferable for users who want to avoid any risk of frame rate dips. The Ultra preset at 1440p is not recommended, as it averages 50 FPS.

At 3840x2160, there is no preset that meets the 60 FPS threshold. The lowest tested preset, Low, averages 56 FPS, which is below playable. Therefore, no settings are recommended for 4K on this hardware. Users seeking 4K gameplay would need to consider a more powerful GPU.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc B580 can run Fivem, but the playable experience is limited to 1080p and 1440p. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS at all presets, including Ultra at 75 FPS, making it fully capable of high-quality, high-refresh-rate gameplay. At 2560x1440, the system is also playable, with High settings averaging 64 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls short at 50 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system is not playable, as even the Low preset averages only 56 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict is clear: this combination is a solid choice for Fivem at 1080p and a viable option for 1440p with adjusted settings, but it is not suitable for 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals that the GPU is the dominant factor in determining Fivem performance at higher resolutions, while the CPU provides a strong foundation. The Core Ultra 7 265, with its 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, demonstrates exceptional single-thread and multi-thread capabilities, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 scores of 5960 single-core and 42216 multi-core. This ensures that the CPU is not a bottleneck for Fivem's game logic and multiplayer networking, even at 1080p where high frame rates place more demand on the processor.

The Arc B580's role becomes more apparent as resolution increases. At 1080p, the GPU is able to keep up with the CPU, resulting in high frame rates across all presets. The drop in performance from 1080p to 1440p is approximately 33-35% across presets, which is a classic sign of GPU-bound scaling. At 4K, the GPU's limitations are fully exposed, with the average FPS falling to 56 on Low, a 64% reduction from the 1080p Low result. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU, not the CPU, is the limiting factor at 1440p and 4K.

For users considering overclocking or hardware upgrades, the data suggests that improving the GPU would yield the most significant gains in Fivem, particularly for 1440p and 4K play. The CPU's performance is more than adequate for this game, and its 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for other tasks. The GPU's 12 GB of memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the raw compute power, as measured by its 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.