Fivem

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 60 FPS?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080 with Low or Medium settings. The recorded data shows 80 FPS on Low and 63 FPS on Medium at 1080p. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1920x1080?

A: Medium is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 63 FPS and a minimum of 54 FPS. High drops to 50 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. That is 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770, and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M. It is 1.4% ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 compare to similar CPUs?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64640, which places it 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P and 0.7% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7343. It is also 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and 0.7% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9124.

Q: What is the GPU's overall standing among all tested GPUs?

A: The Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database, indicating it is a very low-performing part relative to the full field. Its only recorded benchmark is 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: What is the CPU's overall standing among all tested CPUs?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64640. It is a strong desktop processor, though its performance is largely irrelevant to the frame rate in this game.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data for Fivem shows a clear pattern: the Intel Arc B370 is the decisive component in this pairing, and the Core Ultra 7 265's considerable compute power is not the limiting factor at any resolution. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs and posts strong multi-threaded scores like 42216 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, but the GPU sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. In a multiplayer title like Fivem, the frame rate is constrained by the integrated graphics solution, not the processor.

Looking at resolution scaling, the performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is steep. At Medium settings, the average frame rate falls from 63 FPS at 1920x1080 to 41 FPS at 2560x1440, a 22 FPS reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Medium settings drops the average from 41 FPS to 23 FPS. The Low preset shows the same pattern: 80 FPS at 1080p, 53 FPS at 1440p, and 29 FPS at 2160p. These scaling figures indicate that pixel throughput is the bottleneck, which points squarely at the GPU.

The CPU's role becomes even less significant when considering that the Arc B370 is an integrated part with a 25 W TDP and system-shared memory. The GPU's memory bandwidth is listed as system dependent, meaning the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 support and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth feed the graphics solution, but the GPU's own throughput limits remain far below what the CPU can supply. In short, the Core Ultra 7 265 has ample headroom, and the Arc B370 is the wall that frame rates hit.

Preset scaling reinforces this conclusion. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium costs 17 FPS (80 to 63), from Medium to High costs 13 FPS (63 to 50), and from High to Ultra costs 11 FPS (50 to 39). At 1440p, the same progression yields 53, 41, 33, and 26 FPS. At 4K, the numbers are 29, 23, 18, and 14 FPS. The consistent, near-linear degradation across presets and resolutions is typical of a GPU-bound scenario where the integrated GPU's shading units, 1280 in total, and 20 ROPs are overwhelmed.

The verdict is straightforward: the Core Ultra 7 265 is far more capable than this game requires, and the Arc B370 is the component that determines playability. Any attempt to raise resolution or preset quality will be met with disproportionate frame rate losses because the GPU has no reserve capacity.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best recorded average is 29 FPS on Low, followed by 23 FPS on Medium, 18 FPS on High, and 14 FPS on Ultra. Even the lowest settings leave the system more than 30 FPS short of playable, so there is no recommended setting at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the situation is similar but slightly better. Low settings produce 53 FPS, which is close to the 60 FPS target but still below it. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. No preset clears the threshold, so the database records no playable settings at 1440p.

At 1920x1080, the system becomes playable. Low settings deliver 80 FPS, comfortably above the threshold. Medium settings deliver 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS, which is the best playable preset. High falls to 50 FPS and Ultra to 39 FPS, both below the 60 FPS target. The recommended configuration is therefore 1920x1080 with Medium settings, offering the highest visual quality that maintains an average above 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's full list of tested combinations, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3420 out of 3707 combos for Fivem. That places it in the bottom 8% of all tested systems, which is a poor result driven almost entirely by the GPU. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile, but the combo rank reflects the weakest link in the chain.

For context, the GPU's 5th percentile standing among all GPUs means that nearly every other graphics solution in the database outperforms it. The CPU's 93rd percentile standing is essentially wasted in this context, since the Arc B370 cannot translate the processor's capabilities into frame rate. The rank of 3420 out of 3707 is consistent with a system where the integrated GPU is the sole bottleneck.

This rank also implies that most other tested combos, even those with far weaker CPUs, will outperform this system in Fivem if they pair those CPUs with stronger graphics hardware. The data shows that the GPU's 1184 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 is a better predictor of Fivem performance than any CPU metric.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU side, the nearest rivals to the Core Ultra 7 265 are all server-class processors. The AMD EPYC 4464P has an average score of 64823, which is 0.3% higher than the Core Ultra 7 265's 64640. The AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65104, 0.7% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64438, 0.3% lower, and the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202, 0.7% lower. In Fivem, any of these CPUs would behave virtually identically to the Core Ultra 7 265, since the game is GPU-bound in this configuration.

For the GPU side, the nearest rivals are much older discrete parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, essentially the same as the Arc B370's 1184. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% lower. These deltas are all within 1.5% of the Arc B370, meaning that in Fivem, a system with the Core Ultra 7 265 and any of these GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates. The Arc B370's performance class is effectively that of a decade-old entry-level discrete GPU.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Fivem? The answer depends entirely on resolution and settings. At 3840x2160, the system cannot reach 60 FPS on any preset; the best average is 29 FPS on Low, and Ultra drops to 14 FPS. At 2560x1440, the best average is 53 FPS on Low, still short of the threshold, and no other preset comes close. At 1920x1080, the system clears the bar with Low at 80 FPS and Medium at 63 FPS.

The database's verdict by resolution confirms this: playable settings exist only at 1920x1080, with Low and Medium listed as playable and Medium as the best setting at 63 FPS average. For anyone using this hardware, the practical takeaway is to run the game at 1080p and avoid High or Ultra presets, since both fall below 60 FPS. The Core Ultra 7 265 is more than adequate for the task, but the Intel Arc B370's integrated graphics are the limiting factor, and no amount of CPU headroom can compensate for the GPU's 5th percentile standing. This is a system for 1080p play at modest settings, nothing more.