Fivem

FiveM on an Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is a configuration that comfortably clears the 60 FPS bar at two of the three resolutions in the database, and even the hardest test — 4K Ultra — lands at 45 FPS, a number that comes with a clear path to improvement by stepping down one preset. The data shows a combo that ranks 1048th of 3707 tested configurations for this game, placing it in the top portion of hardware setups measured for FiveM. What follows is a breakdown of where this pairing excels, where it runs out of headroom, and which alternative components would behave similarly.

Similar Performance Alternatives

On the CPU side, the Core Ultra 5 245 sits in the 90th percentile against all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 48995. Its nearest rivals are remarkably tight: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196 (just 0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228 (0.5% higher), the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698 (0.6% lower), and the Intel Core i5-14600K scores 48618 (0.8% lower). Any of these processors would deliver effectively indistinguishable average performance in this game. For owners of the i5-14600K in particular, the data indicates there is no meaningful upgrade incentive here — the delta is under 1%.

The GPU picture is more interesting. The RTX 3080 carries an average benchmark score of 23172 and sits in the 68th percentile of all tested GPUs. Its closest rivals by aggregate score include some unexpected names: the NVIDIA P106-100 at 23249, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23250, the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23273, and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23276 — all within half a percent of the 3080's average. Note that these aggregate scores blend compute and graphics tests; the RX 6600M is the most relevant gaming comparison among them. Anyone running one of these alternatives should expect similar overall results, though the 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus with 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth and its PassMark G3D score of 25086 keep it firmly in high-refresh territory for a 2017-release multiplayer title like this.

CPU and GPU Roles

The resolution scaling tells the story of which component is in charge. At 1920x1080, the frame rate ranges from 250 FPS on Low to 122 FPS on Ultra — figures that far exceed what most displays can even show. Moving to 2560x1440 cuts those numbers to 164 and 80 FPS respectively, a drop of roughly a third at each preset. At 3840x2160 the Low result falls to 91 FPS and Ultra to 45 FPS.

That steep, consistent decline as pixel count rises — 250 to 164 to 91 on Low, a 64% drop from 1080p to 4K — indicates the RTX 3080 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU is doing the heavy lifting once the pixel count climbs, which is expected: Fivem is a multiplayer game released in 2017, and its engine demands are modest by modern standards, while the RTX 3080 brings 8704 shading units, 272 tensor cores, and 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput.

At 1080p, the role flips. With the GPU rarely saturated at Low and Medium settings, the Core Ultra 5 245's single-thread performance becomes the ceiling — its PassMark single-thread score of 4394 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648 are strong, and the game's frame rate at 1080p Medium (197 FPS average, 167 minimum, 226 maximum) reflects that capable per-core throughput rather than raw GPU muscle. The 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake design, boosting to 5.10 GHz, has no trouble feeding this title.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but with conditions. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low and Medium per the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 72 FPS with a minimum of 61 and a maximum of 83. High (58 FPS) and Ultra (45 FPS) both fall short of the bar.

Q: What is the best-looking configuration that still hits 60 FPS at each resolution?

A: At 1080p, Ultra at 122 FPS average. At 1440p, Ultra at 80 FPS average. At 4K, Medium at 72 FPS average.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 245 compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 48995 puts it within 1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196), AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228), Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698), and Intel Core i5-14600K (48618).

Q: Where does this combo rank among all configurations tested in Fivem?

A: It ranks 1048th out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it above roughly two-thirds of the field.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 still a capable card for this game?

A: The data says yes. It sits in the 68th percentile of all tested GPUs, posts a PassMark G3D score of 25086, and delivers frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1080p and 1440p on every preset.

Q: Does the game ever drop below 60 FPS?

A: Only at 4K. The Medium preset at 3840x2160 has a recorded minimum of 61 FPS — right at the threshold — while High averages 58 and Ultra averages 45 at that resolution.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC runs Fivem, and runs it well at two of three resolutions. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous:

• 1920x1080: Playable on every preset — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. Best settings: Ultra, averaging 122 FPS.
• 2560x1440: Playable on every preset. Best settings: Ultra, averaging 80 FPS.
• 3840x2160: Playable on Low and Medium only. Best settings: Medium, averaging 72 FPS.

The practical takeaway: for 1080p and 1440p players, this configuration is a set-and-forget build — max the settings and forget the frame counter. For 4K players, Medium is the sweet spot, sitting 12 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold with a recorded minimum of 61 FPS, meaning dips land right at the line rather than below it. High at 4K averages 58 FPS, tantalizingly close but not clearing the bar; a slight settings reduction gets there. All figures are measured data, not estimates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

All results below are measured averages for the Core Ultra 5 245 + RTX 3080 pairing.

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: 91 FPS average
• Medium: 72 FPS average (minimum 61, maximum 83)
• High: 58 FPS average
• Ultra: 45 FPS average

2560x1440

• Low: 164 FPS average
• Medium: 130 FPS average (minimum 110, maximum 149)
• High: 104 FPS average
• Ultra: 80 FPS average

1920x1080

• Low: 250 FPS average
• Medium: 197 FPS average (minimum 167, maximum 226)
• High: 157 FPS average
• Ultra: 122 FPS average

The preset ladder is remarkably even. Each step up in quality costs roughly 20-25% of the frame rate at every resolution, which makes settings tuning predictable: drop one preset tier at 4K and High's 58 FPS becomes Medium's 72. The Medium rows are the only ones with recorded minimum and maximum values, and they show tight frame-time consistency — a 22 FPS spread at 4K, 39 FPS at 1440p, and 59 FPS at 1080p, with the minimum never falling below the playable threshold at the two lower resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

This pairing ranks 1048th out of 3707 configurations tested in Fivem, which places it in the top third of the database for this game. That ranking is consistent with the component percentiles: the Core Ultra 5 245 sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 3080 sits in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU is the softer of the two components in this pairing, and it is also the end-of-life part — NVIDIA lists its production status as ended, whereas the CPU remains in active production.

For context on component standing, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and single-core score of 4648 sit alongside a PassMark multithread result of 38706. The GPU's benchmark portfolio includes a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 152423. Together they produce a balanced mid-to-upper-tier gaming configuration for this title: strong enough for max settings at 1440p, one preset short of comfort at 4K, and more than sufficient for the high-refresh 1080p play that a 2017 multiplayer game invites.