Fivem

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for Fivem with the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 spans three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the combination delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 145 FPS, which is the highest recorded average across the entire dataset. Medium settings follow at 115 FPS, with a minimum of 97 FPS and a maximum of 132 FPS. High settings drop to 92 FPS on average, while Ultra remains comfortably playable at 71 FPS. The absence of minimum and maximum values for Low, High, and Ultra presets means only the Medium preset provides frame-time variance data at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance curve shifts downward but remains largely fluid. Low settings average 96 FPS, Medium settings average 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 87 FPS, and High settings land exactly at 60 FPS. Ultra settings fall below the playable threshold with an average of 47 FPS. The 1440p Medium preset shows a tighter frame range compared to 1080p Medium, suggesting the GPU is becoming a more significant constraint as resolution increases.

At 3840x2160, the hardware struggles to maintain smooth gameplay. Low settings average 53 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium settings average 42 FPS, with a minimum of 36 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS. High settings drop to 33 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 26 FPS. The data indicates that 4K is not a viable resolution for this game with this configuration, even at the lowest quality preset.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU’s nearest rivals in the database provide context for its overall compute capability. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48995, placing it in the 90th percentile among all tested CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196, a negligible 0.4% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228, also within 0.5%. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698, which is 0.6% lower, and the Intel Core i5-14600K scores 48618, 0.8% lower. These deltas are all within one percent, meaning any of these processors would deliver virtually identical frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same GPU.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 holds an average benchmark score of 15290, placing it in the 58th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest competitors are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283 (0% difference), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 15199 (0.6% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 at 15171 (0.8% lower). The RTX 2060 sits essentially at parity with these alternatives. A system built around any of these GPUs with a comparable CPU would produce nearly identical FPS numbers in Fivem at the same settings and resolution.

For practical purposes, swapping the Core Ultra 5 245 for an i5-14600K or Ryzen 9 7900 would not change the observed frame rates. Similarly, substituting the RTX 2060 with an RTX 3050 OEM or RX 7600 would keep performance within the same narrow band. The benchmark data shows that this combo’s FPS are dictated by the GPU’s position in the 58th percentile, not by any single component being an outlier.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific CPU-GPU combination at 2911 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. That places it in the lower third of all recorded configurations, approximately at the 78th percentile from the bottom. This ranking reflects the RTX 2060’s modest standing among GPUs, as the CPU is comparatively strong. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 sits in the 90th percentile for CPUs, while the RTX 2060 sits in the 58th percentile for GPUs. The combined rank is dragged down by the GPU.

In practical terms, this means the combo outperforms roughly 21% of all recorded systems in Fivem, but is outpaced by the remaining 79%. The ranking is not a verdict on playability, as the 1080p and 1440p data demonstrates. It simply shows where this pair lands relative to the entire test pool. With 3707 total combos, a rank of 2911 indicates that a large number of configurations are capable of higher frame rates, but that does not preclude this setup from delivering a smooth experience at lower resolutions.

The Verdict

The recorded verdict data is unambiguous. At 1920x1080, the playable settings list includes Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. The best settings at this resolution are Ultra, with an average FPS of 71. This clears the 60 FPS threshold with a comfortable margin. At 2560x1440, the playable settings are Low, Medium, and High. The best settings at 1440p are High, averaging exactly 60 FPS. That is a pass, but it leaves no headroom for frame drops in heavy multiplayer moments.

At 3840x2160, the playable settings list is empty. No preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The closest is Low at 53 FPS, which is still 7 FPS short. The verdict is that this PC can run Fivem at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K. For users targeting 1080p, Ultra settings are fully viable. For 1440p, High is the maximum playable preset, and even that is borderline. The data suggests that 1440p Medium, at 75 FPS, is the safer choice for sustained performance, though the verdict designates High as the best playable option.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1080p with maximum settings?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 71, which exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 1440p?

A: The highest playable setting at 2560x1440 is High, with an average FPS of exactly 60. Medium runs at 75 FPS and Low at 96 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware in Fivem?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only reach 53 FPS on average. Medium averages 42 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. None clear the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48995. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.4% higher, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is 0.5% higher, the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is 0.6% lower, and the Intel Core i5-14600K is 0.8% lower. All are effectively equal.

Q: How does this GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 has an average benchmark score of 15290. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 is at parity, the AMD Radeon 680M is 0.1% higher, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is 0.6% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is 0.8% lower.

Q: What is the average FPS range at 1080p Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 115, with a minimum of 97 and a maximum of 132.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra. The recorded average at Ultra is 71 FPS. This is the highest quality option that remains playable. Below Ultra, High runs at 92 FPS, Medium at 115 FPS, and Low at 145 FPS, but those are not needed to maintain smooth performance.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that clears 60 FPS is High, with an average of exactly 60 FPS. This leaves no margin, so users who prioritize consistency over peak quality may prefer Medium, which averages 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS. The verdict data designates High as the best playable setting, and that is the answer to the question of maximum quality.

At 3840x2160, no preset meets the 60 FPS requirement. Low averages 53 FPS, Medium averages 42 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. The best settings field for 4K is null, meaning there is no recommended configuration at this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Fivem becomes clear when comparing scaling across resolutions and presets. At 1080p, the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU’s 90th percentile standing provides ample headroom, and the frame rates are limited by the RTX 2060’s 58th percentile position. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p is a drop from 145 FPS to 71 FPS, a 74 FPS reduction, which is almost entirely a GPU workload increase.

At 1440p, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced. The frame rate difference between Low and Ultra is 96 FPS down to 47 FPS, a 49 FPS drop. The fact that High still hits 60 FPS while Ultra falls to 47 FPS indicates a steep GPU cost for the highest-quality assets. The CPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution, as the same processor with a stronger GPU would likely push higher numbers.

At 4K, the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting component. The RTX 2060’s 6 GB memory and 192-bit bus are inadequate for the pixel load. The drop from Low (53 FPS) to Ultra (26 FPS) is a 27 FPS reduction, and even Low cannot reach 60 FPS. The CPU’s compute capabilities are irrelevant at this point, as the GPU is saturated. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings illustrates this: 115 FPS at 1080p falls to 42 FPS at 4K, a 63% reduction. The CPU cannot compensate for the GPU’s inability to fill 4K frames. The data suggests that for users of this combo, resolution is the primary lever, and the GPU dictates the ceiling at every step.