Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the Intel Arc B570 is a capable combination for Fivem, but its playability is strictly resolution-dependent. The data shows this system delivers a smooth 60+ FPS experience at 1080p across all settings and at 1440p up to Medium quality, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K on any preset. The benchmark results place this combo at rank 2980 out of 3707 tested configurations, indicating a mid-tier standing for this specific multiplayer title.

Best Settings per Resolution

1920x1080: The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, achieving an average of 67 FPS. This is the highest visual quality available in the measured data, and it clears the playability threshold with a 7 FPS margin. Given that the average sits at 67 FPS, players have headroom above the 60 FPS minimum, making this the optimal choice for a fully immersive experience at Full HD.

2560x1440: The best setting that maintains 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 71 FPS. While Low also qualifies at 89 FPS, Medium provides a substantially better visual experience. The minimum FPS recorded for Medium is 60, which exactly meets the playable threshold, indicating that this setting is right at the edge of the system's capability. Pushing to High drops the average to 56 FPS, just below the target.

3840x2160: No preset achieves 60 FPS. The closest is Low, which averages 50 FPS, followed by Medium at 39 FPS, High at 31 FPS, and Ultra at 24 FPS. As such, no best settings exist for this resolution, as the system cannot maintain a playable frame rate at any quality level.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 67 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict data lists Ultra as a playable setting at this resolution.

Q: What is the maximum playable preset at 1440p?

A: Medium is the highest setting that stays playable, with an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS. High settings drop to an average of 56 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset only reaches an average of 50 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra average 39, 31, and 24 FPS respectively, all failing to reach the 60 FPS standard.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its direct competitors?

A: The Intel Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534, a deltaPct of 0.1 percent, indicating essentially identical performance. The Intel Arc A750 is also within -0.1 percent.

Q: How does the CPU compare to similar processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48995 and sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, scores 49196 with a deltaPct of -0.4 percent, showing the Ultra 5 is just slightly behind. The Intel Core i5-14600K trails by 0.8 percent.

Q: What frame rate can one expect at 1080p Medium settings?

A: The average FPS is 107, with a minimum of 91 and maximum of 123. This setting offers a very high minimum, providing a consistently smooth experience well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a clear picture of the system's scaling across resolutions and presets. Here is the exact FPS breakdown:

3840x2160 (4K):

• Ultra: 24 FPS average
• High: 31 FPS average
• Medium: 39 FPS average, with a minimum of 33 and maximum of 45
• Low: 50 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Ultra: 44 FPS average
• High: 56 FPS average
• Medium: 71 FPS average, with a minimum of 60 and maximum of 81
• Low: 89 FPS average

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Ultra: 67 FPS average
• High: 86 FPS average
• Medium: 107 FPS average, with a minimum of 91 and maximum of 123
• Low: 136 FPS average

The data shows a consistent scaling pattern: moving from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 20-30 FPS per preset, and moving from 1440p to 4K costs another 20-30 FPS. The transition from Medium to High to Ultra incurs a progressively larger penalty, with the Ultra preset being disproportionately heavy at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is closely matched by several processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has an average score of 49196, a deltaPct of -0.4 percent, meaning the Intel chip is slightly faster. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228 with a deltaPct of -0.5 percent, also a hair ahead. On the Intel side, the Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698 with a 0.6 percent disadvantage, and the Core i5-14600K scores 48618 with a 0.8 percent gap. All these rivals fall within one percent of the Ultra 5 245's performance.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is the closest competitor with a score of 20534 and a deltaPct of 0.1 percent, indicating the Arc B570 is 0.1 percent faster. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 with a deltaPct of -0.1, putting it marginally behind. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480 (deltaPct 0.4), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662 with a deltaPct of -0.5 percent, showing a slightly higher score. In practical terms, a system with any of these rival components would produce nearly identical FPS numbers for this game.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling of performance across resolutions and presets reveals which component is the limiting factor. The CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, is a high performer sitting in the 90th percentile of all processors, with a strong single-thread score of 4394 in Passmark. The GPU, Intel Arc B570, is more mid-range, holding the 65th percentile in all GPUs.

At 1080p, the system achieves a 136 FPS average at Low settings, suggesting the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU frames far beyond what we see at higher settings. As the resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the average FPS drops significantly at the same preset (e.g., Medium goes from 107 to 71 to 39). This pattern indicates the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as pixel count rises; the GPU's workload grows with resolution, while the CPU's load remains relatively constant.

The gap between Low and Ultra settings is also telling. At 1080p, the difference between Low (136 FPS) and Ultra (67 FPS) is 69 FPS, showing a large dependency on the GPU's shading capabilities. At 4K, the same gap is only 26 FPS (50 to 24), which shows the GPU is saturated even at Low settings, preventing Ultra from extracting relative gains. The GPU is definitely the component that dictates playability at higher resolutions, while the CPU has ample headroom to drive high frame rates at 1080p with lower settings.

The Verdict

This system can run Fivem, but only under specific conditions. At 1920x1080, the combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and Arc B570 is fully playable across all settings, with the Ultra preset averaging 67 FPS. This is the best configuration for players seeking 60 FPS and high visual fidelity. At 2560x1440, the system is playable on Low and Medium, with Medium being the best-looking setting at 71 FPS average; High and Ultra fall short at 56 and 44 FPS respectively. At 3840x2160, no setting is playable, as even Low only reaches 50 FPS.

Given the 90th percentile CPU and 65th percentile GPU, the system is well-balanced for 1080p gaming but struggles with 4K. The data indicates that for the best experience, users should stick to 1080p with Ultra settings or 1440p with Medium, both of which clear the 60 FPS threshold with some margin. For 4K, the hardware is simply insufficient to maintain a playable frame rate, so users would need to lower the resolution to achieve smooth performance.

The performance metrics place this system in the 2980th rank out of 3707 combinations, confirming it is a solid but not top-tier setup for Fivem. The Intel Arc B570's a strong match for this game at lower resolutions, but its limitations at higher resolutions are evident, making it a capable choice for 1080p gaming.