Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with Intel Arc B370 graphics can run Fivem, but only at 1080p and only on modest settings. The recorded data shows a single playable configuration: 1920x1080 at Medium preset, where the combo averages 63 FPS. Every higher resolution, and every more demanding preset at 1080p, falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. This outcome is consistent with the hardware balance in the pairing: a processor sitting in the 90th percentile of all CPUs in the database, held back by an integrated-class GPU in the 5th percentile.

Best Settings per Resolution

The best settings per resolution, defined as the most demanding preset that holds at or above 60 FPS average, are:

• 1920x1080: Medium preset, 63 FPS average (the only qualifying combination)
• 2560x1440: No playable settings; the closest result is Low at 53 FPS average, short of 60 FPS
• 3840x2160: No playable settings; even Low manages only 29 FPS average

The verdict is stark at 1440p and 4K. No preset at either resolution clears the playable threshold, so the database records no best settings for them. At 1440p, the gap to reach 60 FPS on Low is real but not enormous, while at 4K the shortfall is severe, with the best result less than half the target. For practical purposes, 1080p Medium is the operating point for this configuration in Fivem.

CPU and GPU Roles

The GPU is the limiting component at every resolution tested, and the imbalance is extreme. The Core Ultra 5 245 ranks in the 90th percentile versus all CPUs in the database with an average benchmark score of 48995, while the Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 1184. That asymmetry, a strong mid-range processor feeding a very weak graphics solution, defines the performance profile.

The scaling data makes the GPU bottleneck visible. Moving from 1080p Medium (63 FPS) to 1440p Medium (41 FPS) cuts frame rates by roughly a third, and 4K Medium drops further to 23 FPS. If the CPU were the constraint, raising resolution would have a much smaller effect because the processor workload is largely resolution-independent. Instead, frame rate falls steeply as pixel count climbs, which is the classic signature of a graphics-bound configuration. The same pattern holds on every preset: Low goes 80, 53, 29 across the three resolutions; High goes 50, 33, 18; Ultra goes 39, 26, 14.

The Arc B370 itself is an integrated graphics solution rather than a discrete card. Its memory is system shared, its bus interface is IGP, its power connectors are none, and its TDP is 25 W. It relies on the system's dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is far below what dedicated graphics memory typically provides and contributes to the steep resolution scaling recorded here.

The processor, for its part, is not the problem. With 14 cores and 14 threads, a 5.10 GHz boost clock, and single-thread results such as 4648 in Cinebench R23 and 4394 in PassMark single-thread, the Core Ultra 5 245 has ample headroom for a multiplayer title like Fivem. In this pairing, that headroom simply goes unused.

Measured FPS Breakdown

All numbers below are measured averages from the database. Where minimum and maximum frame rates were recorded, they appear alongside.

1920x1080

| Preset | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|

| Low | 80 | - | - |

| Medium | 63 | 54 | 72 |

| High | 50 | - | - |

| Ultra | 39 | - | - |

At 1080p, the step from Medium to High costs 13 FPS on average, dropping from 63 to 50. The Medium result shows a 54 to 72 FPS range, meaning dips below 60 occur even at the playable preset, but the average holds above the threshold. Low is comfortable at 80 FPS for players who prioritize frame consistency over visual detail.

2560x1440

| Preset | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|

| Low | 53 | - | - |

| Medium | 41 | 35 | 48 |

| High | 33 | - | - |

| Ultra | 26 | - | - |

1440p is out of reach. The best case, Low, lands at 53 FPS, and Medium's recorded range of 35 to 48 FPS shows the frame rate never approaches 60 even at its maximum. High at 33 FPS and Ultra at 26 FPS are firmly in unplayable territory for a fast-paced multiplayer environment.

3840x2160

| Preset | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|

| Low | 29 | - | - |

| Medium | 23 | 20 | 26 |

| High | 18 | - | - |

| Ultra | 14 | - | - |

4K performance is roughly a third of 1080p at every preset. Medium's 20 to 26 FPS range is the only 4K data with minimums and maximums recorded, and it confirms that the experience never leaves the mid-twenties. Ultra at 14 FPS is the lowest figure in the entire dataset.

Across all twelve measurements, the average spread between Low and Ultra presets is consistent, roughly a 1.9x to 2.05x ratio at every resolution. That consistency again points to GPU throughput as the dominant variable, with the CPU indifferent to preset choice.

How This Combo Ranks

Within Fivem specifically, the Core Ultra 5 245 plus Arc B370 combination ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combinations in the database. That places it in the bottom tenth of the field for this game, which is notable given the CPU's individual strength. The rank confirms what the per-resolution verdicts show: Fivem performance here is dictated almost entirely by the graphics side of the pairing, and no amount of processor capability compensates for a GPU in the 5th percentile.

The contrast between the two components' standings is the key takeaway. A 90th-percentile CPU mated to a 5th-percentile GPU produces a bottom-tenth gaming combination in this title. Players evaluating this setup should understand that the ranking reflects the pairing, not the processor's intrinsic capability.

Similar Performance Alternatives

On the CPU side, the Core Ultra 5 245's nearest rivals in the database are remarkably close in overall score. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G averages 49196 (a 0.4 percent difference), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 averages 49228 (0.5 percent), the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H averages 48698 (0.6 percent), and the Intel Core i5-14600K averages 48618 (0.8 percent). Any of these processors would deliver effectively identical results when paired with equally weak graphics, because Fivem frame rates in this configuration are not CPU-limited.

On the GPU side, the Arc B370's average score of 1184 places it alongside much older hardware. Its nearest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186 (0.2 percent), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190 (0.5 percent), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192 (0.7 percent), and the AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168 (1.4 percent). Systems built around those graphics solutions would be expected to produce Fivem frame rates within a small margin of the numbers recorded here.

The practical implication: anyone whose current system resembles one of those GPU rivals will see similar Fivem performance to this pairing, and anyone with a meaningfully stronger discrete GPU alongside a comparable CPU will land well above the results documented on this page.

FAQ

Q: Can the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and Intel Arc B370 run Fivem at 1080p?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset averages 63 FPS with a recorded range of 54 to 72 FPS, and the Low preset averages 80 FPS. High (50 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 1440p playable with this combo in Fivem?

A: No. The best result at 2560x1440 is 53 FPS on the Low preset, below the 60 FPS playable threshold. No preset at 1440p qualifies as playable in the recorded data.

Q: What is the best settings recommendation for this configuration?

A: 1920x1080 at Medium, delivering a 63 FPS average. It is the only tested combination that reaches or exceeds 60 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the bottleneck?

A: The GPU. The Arc B370 ranks in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, while the Core Ultra 5 245 ranks in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Frame rates drop sharply as resolution rises, from 63 FPS at 1080p Medium to 41 FPS at 1440p and 23 FPS at 4K, which is the signature of a graphics-bound system.

Q: How does this combination rank against others tested in Fivem?

A: It ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom portion of the field for this game despite the CPU's strong individual standing.

Q: Would a different CPU with similar performance change the results?

A: No. Rivals such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Intel Core i5-14600K score within roughly one percent of the Core Ultra 5 245 on average, and since Fivem performance here is GPU-limited, a CPU swap would leave frame rates effectively unchanged.