Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
345 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
169 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
227 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
111 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
126 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
62 FPS
4.6ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 46,062
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 62 80 99 126
1440p QHD 111 143 179 227
1080p Full HD 169 218 272 345

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 218
1920x1080 Low 345
1920x1080 Medium 272
1920x1080 Ultra 169
2560x1440 High 143
2560x1440 Low 227
2560x1440 Medium 179
2560x1440 Ultra 111
3840x2160 High 80
3840x2160 Low 126
3840x2160 Medium 99
3840x2160 Ultra 62

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination delivers exceptional performance in Fivem, with benchmark data showing that every tested resolution and preset combination exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold. The measured results place this pairing in the top 5% of all tested configurations, ranking 180th out of 3,707 total combos, demonstrating that this hardware pairing is far more than sufficient for the demands of this multiplayer title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU component of this pairing, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, sits at the 89th percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 46,062. The nearest performance rivals show remarkably tight clustering around this figure. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 achieves an average score of 46,030, representing a negligible 0.1% difference from the Intel chip. Similarly, the Intel Core i9-13900HX posts 46,098, just 0.1% higher, while the AMD EPYC 4364P and AMD EPYC 7303 deliver scores of 45,970 and 45,960 respectively, each landing within 0.2% of the Ultra 5 235's performance. This grouping suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios within Fivem, any of these processors would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 holds the 87th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 56,083. The closest rival, the AMD Radeon 8060S, scores 55,757, a 0.6% deficit, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB comes within 0.7% at 55,698. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 2.3% with a score of 54,828. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE actually outperforms the RTX 5080 in aggregate benchmarks, posting 57,367, which is 2.2% higher. For Fivem specifically, these GPU alternatives would produce very similar frame rates, though the measured data indicates the RTX 5080's actual gaming performance may differ from its synthetic benchmark standing.

CPU and GPU Roles

Examining the performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the balance shifts between processor and graphics card demands. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system achieves 169 FPS average. Moving to 2560x1440 Ultra drops this to 111 FPS, a 34% reduction, and further to 3840x2160 Ultra brings 62 FPS, another 44% decrease. This substantial scaling with resolution indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as pixel count rises.

The CPU's role is most evident at lower resolutions where frame rates reach extremely high values. At 1920x1080 Low settings, the system produces 345 FPS average, suggesting the processor can feed frames far beyond typical display refresh rates. The transition from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p shows a 51% performance reduction (345 to 169 FPS), which reflects the growing GPU workload from enhanced graphical features. At 4K, the Low preset still manages 126 FPS, while Ultra drops to 62 FPS, a 51% reduction that mirrors the 1080p scaling pattern, confirming that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions while the CPU remains capable throughout.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the benchmark results show remarkable headroom across all presets. Low settings produce 345 FPS average, Medium delivers 272 FPS with a minimum of 232 and maximum of 313, High reaches 218 FPS, and Ultra maintains 169 FPS. These figures indicate that even at the most demanding 1080p settings, the system operates far above the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset still providing nearly three times the playability minimum.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains exceptionally strong. The Low preset achieves 227 FPS average, Medium delivers 179 FPS with a range of 152 to 206, High produces 143 FPS, and Ultra sustains 111 FPS. The step from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 34% performance across matching presets, yet every setting remains comfortably above 100 FPS, demonstrating that this resolution presents no challenge to the hardware combination.

At 3840x2160, the system still exceeds all playability requirements. Low settings produce 126 FPS average, Medium delivers 99 FPS with minimum and maximum readings of 85 and 114, High reaches 80 FPS, and Ultra maintains 62 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is particularly notable as it sits just 2 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, showing that this is the most demanding configuration tested, yet the hardware still provides a playable experience without compromise.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 can absolutely run Fivem at every resolution and preset combination tested. The verdict data confirms that all four settings levels at all three resolutions—3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080—are marked as playable. The best settings at each resolution achieve the following average frame rates: Ultra at 4K delivers 62 FPS, Ultra at 1440p reaches 111 FPS, and Ultra at 1080p attains 169 FPS.

The only configuration that approaches the 60 FPS boundary is 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which averages 62 FPS. While this clears the threshold, it leaves minimal margin for frame rate dips in demanding multiplayer scenarios. All other settings and resolutions provide substantial headroom, with even the weakest combination (4K Ultra) maintaining a 3% buffer above the playability minimum. For players prioritizing maximum visual fidelity at 4K, the system succeeds, though those seeking a more comfortable margin might prefer High settings at 4K, which delivers 80 FPS.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 3840x2160?

A: Yes, the measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 Ultra is 62 FPS, just clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the highest frame rate achieved with this hardware?

A: The maximum measured average is 345 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How much performance is lost when increasing resolution from 1440p to 4K?

A: At Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops from 111 FPS at 2560x1440 to 62 FPS at 3840x2160, a 44% reduction.

Q: Are there any settings at any resolution that fail to reach 60 FPS?

A: No, every tested configuration—all four settings levels across all three resolutions—exceeds the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Which component limits performance more at 4K Ultra settings?

A: The aggressive scaling from 1440p to 4K suggests the GPU becomes the primary constraint, as evidenced by the 49 FPS drop when resolution increases at identical Ultra settings.

Q: What frame rate range can be expected at 2560x1440 Medium settings?

A: The measured range spans from 152 FPS minimum to 206 FPS maximum, with an average of 179 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3,707 tested hardware combinations in the Fivem benchmark database, this pairing of Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 achieves rank 180. This places the system in the top 4.9% of all configurations, an exceptionally strong showing. The high ranking reflects the balanced capabilities of both components—the CPU's 89th percentile standing combined with the GPU's 87th percentile position creates a system that handles Fivem's varied demands effectively.

The ranking suggests that roughly 3,527 other tested combinations deliver lower performance in this game, while only 179 configurations perform better. This positions the system firmly in enthusiast-tier territory, appropriate for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and smooth 4K experiences. The substantial gap between this combo's ranking and the median configuration indicates that users can expect significantly better-than-average performance in Fivem, particularly in multiplayer scenarios where many players and vehicles can create demanding CPU workloads.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 169 FPS. This provides an enormous performance cushion, allowing for maximum visual quality while still delivering frame rates suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.

For 2560x1440, Ultra settings again prove optimal, producing 111 FPS average. This comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS target while providing the full suite of graphical enhancements, making 1440p Ultra the sweet spot for this hardware combination.

At 3840x2160, Ultra settings remain viable with 62 FPS average, though this sits close to the threshold. Players prioritizing stability over maximum visuals might consider High settings at 80 FPS for additional headroom, but the data confirms that 4K Ultra is technically playable. The progression from 1080p to 4K shows consistent performance scaling that reflects the GPU's bandwidth and compute capabilities, with the RTX 5080's 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput proving sufficient for demanding 4K workloads in Fivem.