Fivem

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 processor sits in a tightly contested performance band, with its average benchmark score of 46062 placing it within 0.2% of several comparable parts. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-13900HX, which scores 46098, a delta of -0.1% relative to the Ultra 5 235, meaning the two are effectively interchangeable in compute-heavy workloads. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 trails by a negligible 0.1% with a score of 46030, while the AMD EPYC 4364P and AMD EPYC 7303 post scores of 45970 and 45960, representing deltas of 0.2% and 0.2% respectively. In practical terms, a system built around any of these four CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, assuming the same graphics card and memory configuration. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking across all tested processors reinforces that this is a high-end part, but the narrow gaps to its rivals indicate that the specific choice among these four will not be a deciding factor in gameplay smoothness.

On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B370 is a markedly different story. Its benchmark score of 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, which is a very low standing. The closest comparable parts are all older or lower-tier mobile and desktop cards. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, a delta of -0.2%, while the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, a delta of -0.5%. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% slower with a score of 1192, and the AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% faster with a score of 1168. What this means for the user is that the Arc B370's performance profile is akin to a legacy entry-level discrete GPU from over a decade ago. It is not in the same league as modern mid-range or high-end graphics cards, and this will be the primary constraint on Fivem's performance in this combo, regardless of the CPU's strength.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data across resolutions and settings reveals a system where the GPU is the dominant bottleneck. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate ranges from 14 FPS on Ultra to 29 FPS on Low. The jump from Low to Medium at this resolution is a drop from 29 to 23 FPS, and moving to High further reduces it to 18 FPS. This steep scaling with settings is classic GPU-bound behavior, as the Arc B370's limited shading units and texture rate cannot handle the increased pixel workload. The CPU, with its 14 cores and 14 threads, is not the limiting factor here.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds. Low settings produce 53 FPS, Medium drops to 41 FPS, High to 33 FPS, and Ultra to 26 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 27 FPS, showing that the GPU's performance scales almost linearly with the settings load. At 1920x1080, the situation improves but does not change the fundamental balance. Low settings deliver 80 FPS, Medium 63 FPS, High 50 FPS, and Ultra 39 FPS. Even at the lowest resolution, the GPU is still the deciding factor, as the CPU's headroom is never fully utilized.

The resolution scaling further confirms this. Comparing 1080p Low at 80 FPS to 1440p Low at 53 FPS, the frame rate drops by 34% when pixel count increases by 78%. Similarly, 1080p Medium at 63 FPS versus 1440p Medium at 41 FPS is a 35% decrease. The GPU simply does not have the fill rate or bandwidth to maintain higher FPS as the resolution climbs. In this configuration, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is effectively idle much of the time, waiting on the Arc B370 to complete each frame. For users considering upgrades, replacing the GPU would yield a far larger performance gain than any CPU swap.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the playable frame rates are absent. The Low preset averages 29 FPS with no recorded minimum or maximum, while Medium averages 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 26. High drops to 18 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 14 FPS. None of these settings come close to the 60 FPS playable threshold, and even the minimum on Medium is far below what is needed for a smooth experience.

At 2560x1440, the results are better but still below the playable mark. Low averages 53 FPS, which is the highest recorded value at this resolution. Medium averages 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48. High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. The gap between the best-case Low and the 60 FPS target is 7 FPS, meaning the system cannot consistently hit a playable level at 1440p, even on the lowest settings.

At 1920x1080, the system finally shows playable performance. Low averages 80 FPS, which is comfortably above the threshold. Medium averages 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 72. This is the only settings level that both averages above 60 FPS and has a minimum that, while below the threshold, is close. High averages 50 FPS, and Ultra averages 39 FPS. The data shows a clear progression: as settings increase from Low to Ultra, the average FPS drops by 41 FPS at 1080p, confirming the GPU's sensitivity to graphical load.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3420 out of 3707 total combos. This places it in the bottom 8% of all systems tested for this game. The ranking reflects the severe imbalance between the high-performing CPU and the very low-performing GPU. While the processor is near the top of its class, the graphics card anchors the system to a level that is barely above legacy hardware. The measured FPS data aligns with this ranking, as the system only achieves a playable 60 FPS average at 1080p with Medium or Low settings. For a game like Fivem, which is often CPU-sensitive due to multiplayer server loads, this result is counterintuitive; the CPU is more than capable, but the GPU's limitations cap the experience. Users with this combo should expect to be in the lower percentile of Fivem players in terms of graphical fidelity and frame rate consistency.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average frame rate is 29 FPS on Low settings. Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. None of these are near the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable settings preset at 1080p?

A: The Medium preset at 1920x1080 is the most demanding setting that maintains an average above 60 FPS, with a recorded average of 63 FPS. Low settings average 80 FPS, but Medium is the highest playable option.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370's benchmark score of 1184 is 0.2% lower than the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% lower than the ATI Radeon HD 5770, and 0.7% lower than the AMD Radeon HD 7650M. It is 1.4% faster than the AMD FirePro M2000.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc B370 ranks in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. The frame rate scaling with resolution and settings confirms the GPU is the constraint.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1440p with Low settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Low settings, the average frame rate is 53 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS playable threshold, so the system is not considered playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the overall rank of this combo in the database for Fivem?

A: This combo ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 8% of all systems evaluated for Fivem.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no settings preset achieves an average frame rate of 60 FPS or higher. The best result is 29 FPS on Low, which is far below the playable threshold. The database records no playable settings for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the situation is the same. The highest average is 53 FPS on Low, which misses the 60 FPS target. No settings preset at this resolution is playable.

At 1920x1080, the system becomes playable. The Medium preset is the most demanding option that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS, with a recorded average of 63 FPS. Low settings are also playable at 80 FPS, but Medium is the recommended maximum for a balance between visual quality and frame rate. High and Ultra presets fall to 50 FPS and 39 FPS respectively, which are not playable.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded data, this PC can run Fivem, but only under specific conditions. At 1920x1080, the system achieves a playable experience on both Low and Medium settings, with Medium being the highest playable preset at an average of 63 FPS. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, no settings preset reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold, so the game is not playable at those resolutions. The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p is the sole playable target for this combo, and users should stick to Medium or Low settings to stay above the 60 FPS line. The combination of a top-tier CPU and a bottom-tier GPU means that the system's potential is severely limited by the graphics card, and any attempt to push higher resolutions will result in an unplayable frame rate. For Fivem players who prioritize smoothness over visual fidelity, this system can work at 1080p, but it offers no headroom for higher demands.